*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
*

Methods of soil seed bank estimation: a literature review proposing further work in Africa

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 121-127 (2022)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3850-015
Published: Mar 26, 2022 - Copyright © 2022 SISEF

Review Papers

A number of methods are used to assess the soil seed banks of a range of plant species in various habitats around the world, with approaches that differ between countries and continents. An understanding of the differing techniques emphasises the need for further research, especially in Africa. We reviewed 97 articles on soil seed bank estimation, published between 2010 and 2020, and only 13.41% of these were from Africa. Soil sample collection in Africa was based mainly on stratified random sampling, systematic sampling, random sampling or cluster sampling carried out at the end of each region’s rainy season. Random and cluster sampling were more widely used in savannas, while stratified random and systematic samplings were more common in forests. The shape of the samples was either circular or quadrilateral (square and rectangular) or they were measured by soil mass or volume. The soil sampler cores most often applied were: circular diameter of 5 cm; square sizes of 10 × 10 cm, 20 × 20 cm and 25 × 25 cm; and rectangular sizes of 20 × 25 cm and 20 × 10 cm. The most-used soil core depths were 5 cm and 10 cm. No specific sample shape was linked with either forest or savanna ecosystems, although the number of samples depended on the land use and land cover. Soil seed bank densities and species composition were mainly assessed with direct greenhouse germination over trial duration depending on the plant species’ functional traits. In analysing soil seed bank data, non-parametric statistics were more frequently used than parametric statistics because of the skews in the data. This review will contribute to future soil seed bank studies in Africa.

Soil Seed Bank, Sampling Methods, Greenhouse Germination, Literature Review

  Introduction 

Seeds from a broad range of plant species occur in soil seed banks in various habitats and may be peculiarly important in restoration projects, where preferred species have been lost from the vegetation but survive in the seed bank ([9]). Large amounts of seeds can remain dormant in soil for many years, and can germinate when conditions become favourable ([74]). Soil seed banks are therefore important in understanding vegetation history as the vegetation composition in terms of plant species is influenced by seeds production, dispersal and longevity of seeds as well as soil depth ([66]). Significant role can be attributed to seed banks as the determinant of future vegetation, especially after a disturbance ([74]).

In assessing soil seed banks, basic approaches (for example wet sieving and flotation, both of which are followed by identification of seeds under a stereoscopic microscope) are emphasised ([66]). Other approaches include the cultivation of soil samples and subsequent identification of the emergent seedlings ([4]). The advantages and disadvantages of each of these methods have been demonstrated independently by various researchers and have been subject to extensive discussion ([29], [43]). Moreover, the flotation approach was criticised for its inaccuracy ([30]), and therefore the two remaining approaches (cultivation of soil samples approach and wet sieving approach) would have been more widely used in recent soil seed bank analyses.

Although soil seed bank studies have been conducted in many parts of the world, the literature shows a large range of methods from sampling stage to the estimation of species diversity and density and sometime with methodological biases along the study process ([11]). Thus, no adequacy of soil seed bank assessment methods has been reported yet. For example, in the attempts to minimize sampling method biases, many research dealt with the tedious compensable process of huge amount of soil samples without sufficient guarantee ([9]).

In addition, soil seed bank assessment in different ecosystems was conducted with time and labour investment because of the technicalities of the method procedures ([5]). It is therefore important to document the soil seed bank assessment method in relation to the ecosystems for further research on the technical and method procedures.

Many African ecosystems are degraded due to multiple factors such as fire, intensive logging, grazing and climatic change ([56]). Thus, there is a need for ecosystems restoration and conservation in Africa. The soil seed bank of theses ecosystems may be of interest for ecological restoration due to the presence of seeds from the above vegetation in the soil ([55]). Moreover, it might be acknowledged that few studies concern this topic in Africa. Despites the few studies on soil seed bank assessment in African ecosystems (Tab. S1 in Supplementary material), there is a lack of reference method for trials experiment, data collection and analysis. The method bias is an issue for seed bank analyses and discussion of the results ([10]). To make soil seed bank analysis more useful and especially in Africa, it should be important to integrate data from various databases. Combined environmental data (soils, vegetation and climate) would allow modelling of plant species distribution and/or ecological characteristics of stand vegetation ([21], [64]) to aid landscape restoration. The challenge of this literature review was to find which seed bank assessment methods would be preferentially adopted in soil seed bank assessment in Africa. This paper was then based on soil seed bank literature in relation to vegetation patterns (grassland or savannas and forests) and aims both to highlight the relevant literature on recent methods used in seed bank studies and to emphasise the need for further research within this area in Africa.

  Methods of literature search 

The Web of Sciences® database was consulted for the papers published in the period of 2010-2020. The keywords used to search the papers included “soil seed bank”, “seed bank and methods”, “seed bank and soil sample”, “soil seed bank and Africa”, “seed bank and grassland”, “seed bank and savannas”, “seed bank and forest”, “seed bank and herbaceous”, “seed bank and tree species”. The papers that did not clearly provide the methods used in soil seed bank assessment were discarded as well as the review papers that did not focus on understanding the seed bank assessment efficiency and/or the accuracy of a method or the comparison of methods. A total of 97 papers were finally considered for this review. Data were analyzed with regard to the objectives of the study, the soil sampling methods, soil sample size, number of samples, seed bank estimation methods, above-ground vegetation analysis methods, soil analysis methods, duration of trial, type of data collected during trial, data analysis methods, plant species studied (herbaceous, trees or both), vegetation type (savanna, grassland, forest), country and continent. Frequency, tables and charts were used to present the findings.

Review of seed bank literature

The main objectives of the studies examining soil seed banks were: (1) to assess the effects and intensity of earlier disturbance on aboveground vegetation ([69], [39], [48], [54]); (2) to evaluate restoration methods ([36], [32], [42]); and (3) to understand habitat resilience to threat ([14], [75], [22]). Others studies have focused on the comparison of ecological habitats in terms of plant species, diversity variation in seed banks ([1], [18], [57], [19]) and dynamics of soil seed banks in relation to aboveground vegetation ([25]).

Studies concerning the methods of soil seed banks assessment were mostly related to the composition and structure of the above-vegetation in relation to the soil seed bank ([3], [29], [60], [53], [49]). Other studies addressed how to reduce bias in greenhouse seed bank data by using post-disturbance gap emergence trials ([49]) and considered whether a large number of small-sized samples are important in forest soil seed bank characterisation ([60]). In addition, these methodologies were widely tested in different ecosystems in North and South America, Asia and Europe. However, few studies addressed the methods of soil seed banks assessment in Africa with diverse ecosystems. Two categories of research questions were addressed in the studies conducted in Africa, such as: (i) how land use or land disturbance affect seed bank richness, density and distribution ([20], [1], [67], [69], [26], [2], [54]); and (ii) the relationship between the soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation and the impact of forest management on seed bank ([13], [27], [28], [55], [65], [19]). This review is therefore an important step to guide future soil seed bank study in Africa.

Seed bank sampling methods

The choice of soil sampling technique in seed bank assessment is as important as the number and dimensions of the sample ([5], [45]). A total of 75% of the papers considered used stratified random sampling techniques for sample collection, while 14% used systematic sampling, 10% used random sampling and 1% used cluster sampling. The chosen sampling method did not depend on the study location and the objectives of the study, but rather on the homogeneity of the aboveground vegetation of the study area ([33], [66]), the slopes of the vegetation site surveyed ([60], [49]) or the intensity of land use and disturbance ([20], [63], [44], [17], [59]). Thus, all the sampling methods can be used in Africa ecosystems. Up to now, two sampling methods (systematic and stratified random samplings) were used in the studies carried out in Africa. The systematic sampling concerned three studies in forest ecosystems ([13], [19]), savanna and grassland ecosystems ([54]). The stratified random concerned 10 studies in woodland and savanna ecosystems ([20], [69], [55], [2]), desert ecosystems ([27], [28]), farmland ([1]) and tree plantations ([67], [65], [26]).

With the systematic sampling method, a complete description of the units (or individuals) and their arrangement in the population is required. The first unit is drawn at random from the population, and every n-th unit is selected until the desired sample size has been obtained. With stratified random sampling, a population is first divided into subpopulations or strata, which may or may not be of equal size. Within each stratum, a sample is selected randomly and independently. With cluster sampling, groups of units are selected randomly from the population. These groups can also be called clusters or primary units and are composed of secondary units. With cluster sampling, all secondary units are sampled. Simple random sampling is a method where each possible sampling unit has an equal (or known) probability of being selected, and the random selection of such units ensures unbiased estimates of population means and sampling variance.

The systematic and stratified random methods were used for trees and herbaceous plants in forest, savanna and grass vegetation patterns. The cluster and random methods were used with herbaceous plants in savannas and grasslands. The stratified random sampling technique was mostly applied in the forest and savanna vegetation (Fig. 1). The choice of method can be due to the heterogeneity in land cover within these ecosystems, to reduce bias ([17], [59]). In Africa, stratified random design method was mostly used due to the spatial heterogeneity within each ecosystem (physical, biological, or environmental characteristics - [43]). Thus, this method can be the most appropriate within Africa ecosystems when heterogeneity has to be taken into consideration.

Fig. 1 - Methods of soil sampling applied in forests and savannas.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Soil sample shape and dimension

The samples taken in soil seed bank studies were circular, square or rectangular. The most common sample shape was the circular method with 47% of studies, followed by quadrilateral at 37%, of which squares made up 58.74% and rectangles 41.26%. There was no specific sample shape linked with either forest or savanna ecosystems. This is due to the land cover heterogeneity within each ecosystem of forest or savanna ([74]). Thus, all the sample shapes can be used in Africa ecosystems. The shapes used in Africa included circular plots in savanna, grassland and tree plantations ecosystems ([20], [2]), square plots in savanna and woodland ecosystems ([54], [55]) and rectangular plots in desert ecosystems ([27], [28]). More evidences are needed on the relevant shape to consider within each ecosystem in Africa, as the shape used to assess vegetation pattern varied according to the ecosystem ([52]).

The diameter of the circular-shaped plot varied from 1.8 cm to 40 cm, although 5 cm was most commonly applied (55.3%), followed by 1.8 cm (13.03%), 2 cm (10.31%), 2.5 cm (7.19%), 9 cm (6.38%), 12.5 cm (4.51%), 20 cm (2.94%) and 40 cm (0.34%). No specific diameter was attributed to a study area, or to a country or continent. Thus, the different diameters can be used in Africa ecosystems. The diameters used in Africa included 5 and 8.5 cm in savanna and grassland ecosystems, respectively ([20], [2]), 5 cm in pine plantations and 6 cm in Acacia plantations ([26], [65]). More research is needed to provide evidence on the specific diameter to consider within each ecosystem in Africa.

With the quadrilateral shape, the square was more widely used than the rectangle. The most common sizes were 10 × 10 cm (48.25%), 20 × 20 cm (25.75%) and 25 × 25 cm (22.59%), with others (15 × 15 cm, 30 × 30 cm, etc.) rarely considered (3.41%). The most-used rectangular shapes were 20 × 25 cm (62.36%) and 20 × 10 cm (23.01%), followed by 15 × 8 cm (8.21%), 25 × 39 cm (3.33%) and others (37 × 27 cm; 30 × 10 cm; 135 × 50 cm, etc.) at 3.09%. Soil volume or soil mass ([1], [7], [23], [35]) and sampling area ([71], [72], [41]) were rarely used in soil seed bank assessment studies. The size mostly used in Africa included 15 × 15 cm in savanna and woodland ([55], [54]) and 20 × 25 cm in desert ecosystem ([28]). More research is needed to provide evidence on the specific size to consider within each ecosystem in Africa.

Soil depth also influences soil seed bank estimation ([11]). The most frequently applied depths of soil cores were 5 cm (53.27%) and 10 cm (40.64%). Other studies assessed the variation in the soil core depths from 0 to 20 cm at intervals of 5 cm (0-5 cm, 5-10 cm, 10-15 cm and 15-20 cm) and its influence on soil seed banks ([16], [61], [40]). There was no relationship between soil core depth and study area or geographic location. However, soil core depth was linked to the plant species’ seed behaviour (seeds mass and shape) or habitat (soil and vegetation type - [74], [47], [54]). While the different soil depth can be considered in Africa ecosystems, further studies are needed to address the relevant soil depth within each ecosystem. The soil depths actually considered in studies conducted in Africa included simple and multi layers. The simple layers included 0-4 cm in savanna and grassland ecosystems ([20]), 0-5 cm in desert ecosystems ([27], [28]) and forest ecosystems ([13]), 0-10 cm ([26]) and 0-15 cm ([65]) in tree plantations. The multi layers included 0-3, 3-6, 6-9 in savanna and woodland ecosystems ([55]), 0-5, 5-10, 10-15 cm in savanna and grassland ecosystems ([2], [54]), 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm in forest ecosystems ([19]).

Sample number

In assessing soil seed banks, the number of soil samples taken is crucial not only to promote the accuracy of the study and the relevance of its results ([45]) but is also key to considerations of both time and labour intensity ([5], [3]) and hence to cost-benefit ([46]). The challenge of this review is to find which sample number should be preferentially adopted in soil seed bank evaluation, especially in Africa. Regarding this matter, it has been stated that the sampling method can influence the sample number in any given ecosystem ([3]). For example, the sample number can be less from systematic sampling than from random sampling without losing relevance in results while using the same sample dimension. However, regardless of sampling method, accuracy in soil seed bank estimation can be improved by ensuring a sufficient number of samples ([6]). This is because the precision in gauging seed densities may be under- or overestimated when the number of samples is small ([74]). Therefore, the number of soil samples should be more than 50 to provide a reasonable estimate of the seed density ([6]). However, this number can be less in areas with high density of seed banks ([45]).

Among examples of soil seed bank studies in Africa, Sanou et al. ([54]) used 720 soil samples when comparing the aboveground vegetation and soil seed bank composition related to different grazing intensities in Burkina Faso. Tessema et al. ([69]) used 544 soil samples to assess changes in grass plant populations and temporal soil seed bank dynamics in a semi-arid African savanna. Gomaa ([28]) considered 450 soil samples in a desert ecosystem when reporting on the variation between soil seed banks and stand vegetation in Egypt. In other papers focused on Africa, the number of soil samples depended on the volume of soil available to use ([19]).

Period of soil sampling

The timing of soil sample collection is of great importance in soil seed bank assessment studies ([70]). Several papers highlighted the period of field soil sample collection, at least in reference to the seasonal climate of the study area. The end of the rainy season was most cited for soil sampling in tropical regions, particularly those in Africa ([8], [55], [65], [54], [62]). During this period, it is easier to investigate the composition, density and vertical distribution of the viable soil seed bank. Seed dispersal in rainy season could attain the peak and the persisting seed from the previous season could still germinate ([55], [65], [54]). The earlier germination of the transient seeds can also justify the choice of the end of the rainy season. Moreover, the end of the rainy season can allow collecting information on total soil seed bank, because seed dispersal ended in this period and most transient seeds may already emerge ([43]).

Other studies generally matched sampling to the period between earlier seed bank germination and when the new seeds had matured and spread ([69]), which may correspond to the rainy season when there is abundant seed availability in the soil ([61], [62]). Moreover, the particular research goal can often lead the timing of soil sampling for vegetation evaluation ([11]). In these cases, phenological processes of the stand vegetation or of the given species would be important in seed bank composition. Evidently, the life duration of seeds would also be important in setting the time period of sampling ([51]). More literature focusing on the study object would therefore be helpful in further establishing the timing of soil sampling in seed bank characterisation.

Seed bank estimation methods

Many methods have been used in the literature to estimate seed numbers in soil samples. Warr et al. ([74]) highlighted the separation of seeds from soil by using water (washing or flotation); this method was not appropriate in several cases because of the non-distinction between viable and unviable seeds and the underestimation of species numbers due to the similarity of different seeds. Also, the risk of washing out of very small seeds makes the method very uncertain. Thus, alternative methods of seed numbering using germination were developed to improve the accuracy in soil seed bank estimation.

Three methods of seed numbering by germination have been used to assess seed banks in soil samples. Direct greenhouse germination was most frequently used to assess soil seed bank densities and species composition (60.22% of the examined studies). This method of quantifying seeds in soil samples was most practised in South America, Oceania, North America, Asia and Africa (Fig. 2). The second method most favoured worldwide was the use of sieving before seed germination (23.86%). Soil seed bank estimation in Europe used this method more than the others. The third approach was the seed separation method (15.92 %), which was less used in all the regions (Fig. 2). Combinations of methods includng the seed concentration method ([68]) or sieving ([50]) before seed germination were used in the estimation of soil seed bank (40% of papers). Therefore, the germination of soil seed (greenhouse trial) can be applied after sieving seeds, for example (seed concentration). The combination of methods can often be used to test when seed already identified is also viable or to confirm the plant species.

Fig. 2 - Methods of soil seed bank estimation in studies worldwide (2010-2020).

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Each method has its advantages and disadvantages ([74]). Many authors highlighted that methods in combination could increase precision in seed density estimation ([71]). However, the methods can also be used separately, not only to determine seed densities in soil layers, but also to test seed viability via germination ([65]) or to compare the efficacy of different methods ([29]). Of the entire above, no specificity was found for the methods used and habitat type ([43]). The same method singly or in combination that is applied in soil seed assessment for forest ecosystem can also be used for savanna ecosystems. Thus, all the methods can be used in Africa ecosystems. Direct greenhouse germination was mostly used in Africa (62%) with samples from savannas ecosystems ([1], [69], [55]), savanna and grassland ecosystems ([2], [54]) and tree plantation ([67], [26], [65]). The combination of the direct greenhouse germination method with either the seed concentration method of Ter Heerdt et al. ([68]) or sieving of Roberts ([50]) was also used (38%) in seed bank assessment in Africa ecosystems, including forest ([13], [19]), savanna and grassland ecosystems ([20]) and desert ecosystems ([27], [28]). More research is needed to provide evidence on the appropriate methods for each ecosystem in Africa.

Data collection and seed bank analysis methods

In the greenhouse, the frequency of data collection on seed germination, seedling growth and radicle elongation was daily, weekly or monthly, depending on plant species biology. More than 83% of the examined papers showed that data on the emerged seedlings were collected during the growth trial in the greenhouse. Many authors noted that the trays needed to be checked at regular intervals for new emergent seedlings ([47], [18], [55], [54]). Each germinated seed was counted, recorded and removed. When seedling identification was not easy, it was transplanted elsewhere and grown until species identification was possible. Therefore, the trial duration depended on the plant species under study and could vary from two weeks to two years. The study area or habitat had no link with the duration of the trial for species identification. This variation can also be applied in Africa ecosystems where the actual duration of trial germination varied from 3 weeks ([1], [2]) to 9 months ([69], [26]) for samples collected from savanna ecosystems ([1], [69], [55]) or grassland ecosystems ([2], [54]).

Seed density or diversity indices (stand vegetation and seedling) were mostly calculated in the published papers regarding soil seed bank assessment. Thereby, in order to compare diversity between areas of seed banks, the coefficients of similarity were often used ([74]). Therefore, the Sørensen’s similarity index between seed bank and aboveground vegetation was calculated using presence-absence data ([58], [24], [59]). Other statistical methods were also used to compare the seed bank density with aboveground vegetation. In this case, non-parametric statistics were found to be more relevant than parametric statistics because of the skews in seed bank data (even after data transformation) in order to meet the statistical requirements ([74]). Several studies used the Kruskal-Wallis test or the Mann-Whitney U test to compare density of emerged seedlings, floristic composition, richness and diversity of species ([12], [15], [25], [38], [44], [34], [57], [61]). However, parametric statistics were still used either with or without data transformation to compare seed banks with standing vegetation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Tukey’s test were applied to structural differences by Kunz & Martins ([37]), Shang et al. ([58]), Galloway et al. ([26]), Luo et al. ([42]), Forte et al. ([23]) and Sharma et al. ([59]). Data can also be analysed by performing a generalised linear mixed model to highlight the relationship between seed density and species composition ([31], [65], [22], [48], [73]).

  Conclusion 

This study reviewed the existing literature on soil seed bank assessment and the methodologies used from sampling to data analysis. Of the 97 scientific papers reviewed, only 13.40% were from Africa. The stratified random sampling method was the most applied for soil sampling due to heterogeneity in the land cover within the ecosystems. The circular sample with 5 cm diameter and 5 cm depth was most widely used to sample the soil. For soil seed bank estimation, the greenhouse germination method was the most adopted. Data on seed germinated, seedling growth and radicle elongation were collected at daily, weekly or monthly intervals based on species behaviour. For data analysis, floristic data were generally analysed with the Sørensen’s similarity index, while ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for density data. Generalized linear models were used to show the relationship between seed density and species composition. The methods used in soil seed bank assessment are not specific to a region and can be transferred in all ecosystems in Africa for ecological restoration. This review is an important step in furthering soil seed bank estimation in Africa for ecosystems restoration.

  Acknowledgements 

This work was supported by the ARES development cooperation. The authors thank Dr. Kasso Daïnou, Dr. Félicien Tosso and Prof. Jean Louis Doucet from the tropical and subtropical forestry laboratory, University Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Gembloux (FUSAGx), Belgium.

  References

(1)
Adereti RO, Takim FO, Abayomi YA (2014). Effect of period of sugarcane cultivation on the abundance and distribution of weed seeds in the soil profile. Planta Daninha 32 (3): 507-513.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Akande F, Ogunkunle C, Ajayi S (2018). Contamination from petroleum products: impact on soil seed banks around an oil storage facility in Ibadan, South-West Nigeria. Pollution 4 (3): 515-525.
Online | Gscholar
(3)
Ambrosio L, Iglesias L, Marín C, Del Monte JP (2004). Evaluation of sampling methods and assessment of the sample size to estimate the weed seedbank in soil, taking into account spatial variability. Weed Research 44 (3): 224-236.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Bakker J, Bakker E, Rosén E, Verweij G, Bekker R (1996). Soil seed bank composition along a gradient from dry alvar grassland to Juniperus shrubland. Journal of Vegetation Science 7 (2): 165-176.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Benoit DL, Kenkel NC, Cavers PB (1989). Factors influencing the precision of soil seed bank estimates. Canadian Journal of Botany 67 (10): 2833-2840.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Bigwood DW, Inouye DW (1988). Spatial pattern analysis of seed banks: an improved method and optimized sampling. Ecology 69 (2): 497-507.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Bourgeois B, Boutin C, Vanasse A, Poulin M (2017). Divergence between riparian seed banks and standing vegetation increases along successional trajectories. Journal of Vegetation Science 28 (4): 787-797.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Braga AJT, Borges EE, Martins SV (2016). Seed bank in two sites of semideciduous seasonal forest in Viçosa, Minas Gerais. Revista Árvore 40 (3): 415-425.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Brock MA, Theodore K, O’Donnell L (1994). Seed-bank methods for Australian wetlands. Marine and Freshwater Research 45 (4): 483-493.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Chiquoine LP, Abella SR (2018). Soil seed bank assay methods influence interpretation of non-native plant management. Applied Vegetation Science 21: 626-635.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Csontos P (2007). Seed banks: ecological definitions and sampling considerations. Community Ecology 8 (1): 75-85.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Cubiña A, Mitchell Aide T (2001). The effect of distance from forest edge on seed rain and soil seed bank in a tropical pasture. Biotropica 33 (2): 260.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Daïnou K, Bauduin A, Bourland N, Gillet J-F, Fétéké F, Doucet J-L (2011). Soil seed bank characteristics in Cameroonian rainforests and implications for post-logging forest recovery. Ecological Engineering 37: 1499-1506.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Davies RJP, Whalen MA, Mackay DA, Taylor D, Pisanu P (2013). Does soil seed bank diversity limit post-fire regeneration in small, fragmented, long-unburnt remnants of fire adapted vegetation? Biological Conservation 158: 287-295.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
De Andrade LAZ, Miranda HS (2014). The dynamics of the soil seed bank after a fire event in a woody savanna in central Brazil. Plant Ecology 215 (10): 1199-1209.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
De Rouw A, Casagrande M, Phaynaxay K, Soulileuth B, Saito K (2014). Soil seedbanks in slash-and-burn rice fields of northern Laos. Weed Research 54 (1): 26-37.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Deiss L, Moraes A, Pelissari A, Porfírio-Da-Silva V, Schuster MZ (2018). Weed seed bank in an agroforestry system with eucalyptus in subtropical Brazil. Planta Daninha 36.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Dos Santos DM, Dos Santos JMFF, Da Silva KA, De Araújo VKR, Araújo EL (2016). Composition, species richness, and density of the germinable seed bank over 4 years in young and mature forests in Brazilian semiarid regions. Journal of Arid Environments 129: 93-101.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Douh C, Daïnou K, Joël Loumeto J, Moutsambote JM, Fayolle A, Tosso F, Forni E, Gourlet-Fleury S, Doucet JL (2018). Soil seed bank characteristics in two central African forest types and implications for forest restoration. Forest Ecology and Management 409: 766-776.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Dreber N, Esler KJ (2011). Spatio-temporal variation in soil seed banks under contrasting grazing regimes following low and high seasonal rainfall in arid Namibia. Journal of Arid Environments 75 (2): 174-184.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Ewald J, Hennekens S, Conrad S, Wohlgemuth T, Jansen F, Jenssen M, Cornelis J, Michiels HG, Kayser J, Chytry M, Gégout JC, Breuer M, Abs C, Walentowski H, Starlinger F, Godefroid S (2013). Spatial and temporal patterns of Ellenberg nutrient values in forests of Germany and adjacent regions-a survey based on phytosociological databases. Tuexenia 33 (1): 93-109.
Online | Gscholar
(22)
Fernández C, Vega JA, Fontúrbel T (2018). Contribution of the soil seed bank to the recovery of a Cytisus oromediterraneus shrubland after fuel reduction treatments. Ecological Engineering 120: 109-115.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Forte CT, Galon L, Beutler AN, Basso FJM, Nonemacher F, Júnior FWR, Perin GF, Tironi SP (2018). Soil management systems and their effect on the weed seed bank. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 53 (4): 435-442.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Fragoso RO, Carpanezzi AA, Zuffellato-Ribas KC, Koehler HS (2018). Seed bank from abandoned pastures in the coastal region of Paraná. Floresta e Ambiente 25 (3): 1-11.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Franzese J, Ghermandi L, Gonzalez SL (2016). Historical land use by domestic grazing revealed by the soil seed bank: a case study from a natural semi-arid grassland of NW Patagonia. Grass and Forage Science 71: 315-327.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Galloway AD, Holmes PM, Gaertner M, Esler KJ (2017). The impact of pine plantations on fynbos above-ground vegetation and soil seed bank composition. South African Journal of Botany 113: 300-307.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Gomaa NH (2012). Soil seed bank in different habitats of the Eastern Desert of Egypt. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 19 (2): 211-220.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Gomaa NH (2014). Microhabitat variations and seed bank-vegetation relationships in a desert wadi ecosystem. Flora 209 (12): 725-732.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Gonzalez SL, Ghermandi L (2012). Comparison of methods to estimate soil seed banks: the role of seed size and mass. Community Ecology 13 (2): 238-242.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Gross KL (1990). A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil. The Journal of Ecology 78: 1079-1093.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Havrdová A, Douda J, Doudová J (2015). Local topography affects seed bank successional patterns in alluvial meadows. Flora 217: 155-163.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Helsen K, Hermy M, Honnay O (2015). Changes in the species and functional trait composition of the seed bank during semi-natural grassland assembly: seed bank disassembly or ecological palimpsest? Journal of Vegetation Science 26 (1): 58-67.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(33)
Hopfensperger KN (2007). A review of similarity between seed bank and standing vegetation across ecosystems. Oikos 116 (9): 1438-1448.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Jaroszewicz B, Kwiecien K, Czortek P, Olech W, Piroznikow E (2017). Winter supplementary feeding influences forest soil seed banks and vegetation. Applied Vegetation Science 20 (4): 683-691.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
Klaus VH, Schäfer D, Prati D, Busch V, Hamer U, Hoever CJ, Kleinebecker T, Mertens D, Fischer M, Hölzel N (2018). Effects of mowing, grazing and fertilization on soil seed banks in temperate grasslands in Central Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 256: 211-217.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(36)
Klooster WS, Herms DA, Knight KS, Herms CP, McCullough DG, Smith A, Gandhi KJK, Cardina J (2014). Ash (Fraxinus spp.) mortality, regeneration, and seed bank dynamics in mixed hardwood forests following invasion by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biological Invasions 16 (4): 859-873.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
Kunz SH, Martins SV (2016). Soil seed bank in seasonal semideciduous forest and abandoned pasture. Revista Árvore 40 (6): 991-1001.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(38)
Lacerda F, Miranda I, Lima TTS, Mafra NA, Leão FM, Do Vale I, Bispo CJC, Kato OR (2016). Origin of and resulting floristic composition from seedbanks in agroforestry systems of Tomé-Açu, Eastern Amazon. Weed Research 56 (3): 219-228.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(39)
Leder CV, Peter G, Funk FA, Peláez DV (2017). Consequences of anthropogenic disturbances on soil seed bank diversity and nurse shrub effect in a semiarid rangeland. Biodiversity and Conservation 26 (10): 2327-2346.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Lipoma ML, Funes G, Díaz S (2018). Fire effects on the soil seed bank and post-fire resilience of a semi-arid shrubland in central Argentina. Austral Ecology 43 (1): 46-55.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(41)
Londe V, De Sousa HC, Kozovits AR (2017). Exotic and invasive species compromise the seed bank and seed rain dynamics in forests undergoing restoration at urban regions. Journal of Forestry Research 28 (5): 1019-1026.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(42)
Luo X, Cao M, Zhang M, Song X, Li J, Nakamura A, Kitching R (2017). Soil seed banks along elevational gradients in tropical, subtropical and subalpine forests in Yunnan Province, southwest China. Plant Diversity 39 (5): 273-286.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(43)
Mahé I, Cordeau S, Bohan DA, Derrouch D, Dessaint F, Millot D, Chauvel B (2021). Soil seedbank: old methods for new challenges in agroecology? Annals of Applied Biology 178 (1): 23-38.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(44)
Maia P, Vasques A, Pausas JG, Viegas DX, Keizer JJ (2016). Fire effects on the seed bank of three Mediterranean shrubs: implications for fire management. Plant Ecology 217 (10): 1235-1246.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(45)
Mickelson JA, Stougaard RN (2003). Assessment of soil sampling methods to estimate wild oat (Avena fatua) seed bank populations. Weed Science 51 (2): 226-230.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(46)
Nadon MO, Stirling G (2006). Field and simulation analyses of visual methods for sampling coral cover. Coral Reefs 25 (2): 177-185.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(47)
O’Donnell J, Fryirs K, Leishman MR (2014). Digging deep for diversity: riparian seed bank abundance and species richness in relation to burial depth. Freshwater Biology 59 (1): 100-113.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(48)
Palmer HD, Denham AJ, Ooi MKJ (2018). Fire severity drives variation in post-fire recruitment and residual seed bank size of Acacia species. Plant Ecology 219 (5): 527-537.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(49)
Plue J, Colas F, Auffret AG, Cousins SAO (2017). Methodological bias in the seed bank flora holds significant implications for understanding seed bank community functions. Plant Biology 19 (2): 201-210.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(50)
Roberts HA (1981). Seed banks in soil. Advanced Applied Biology 6: 1-55.
Gscholar
(51)
Saatkamp A, Henry F, Dutoit T (2017). Vegetation and soil seed bank in a 23-year grazing exclusion chronosequence in a Mediterranean dry grassland. Plant Biosystems 152 (5): 1020-1030.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(52)
Salako VK, Glele Kakaï RL, Assogbadjo AE, Fandohan B, Houinato M, Palm R (2013). Efficiency of inventory plot patterns in quantitative analysis of vegetation: a case study of tropical woodland and dense forest in Benin. Southern Forests 75 (3): 137-143.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(53)
Sandra MGG, Lufs Sa RM, Leonel L, Felipe BA (2016). The Andean forest soil seed bank in two successional stages in Northeastern Colombia. Botanical Sciences 94 (4): 713-727.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(54)
Sanou L, Zida D, Savadogo P, Thiombiano A (2018). Comparison of aboveground vegetation and soil seed bank composition at sites of different grazing intensity around a savanna-woodland watering point in West Africa. Journal of Plant Research 131 (5): 773-788.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(55)
Savadogo P, Sanou L, Dayamba SD, Bognounou F, Thiombiano A (2017). Relationships between soil seed banks and above-ground vegetation along a disturbance gradient in the W National Park trans-boundary biosphere reserve, West Africa. Journal of Plant Ecology 10 (2): 349-363.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(56)
Savadogo P, Tiveau D, Sawadogo L, Tigabu M (2008). Herbaceous species responses to long-term effects of prescribed fire, grazing and selective tree cutting in the savanna-woodlands of West Africa. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 10 (3): 179-195.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(57)
Schwab A, Kiehl K (2017). Analysis of soil seed bank patterns in an oxbow system of a disconnected floodplain. Ecological Engineering 100: 46-55.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(58)
Shang Z, Yang S, Wang Y, Shi J, Ding L, Long R (2016). Soil seed bank and its relation with above-ground vegetation along the degraded gradients of alpine meadow. Ecological Engineering 90: 268-277.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(59)
Sharma A, Bohn KK, Jose S, Miller DL (2018). Seed bank vegetation dynamics along a restoration management gradient in pine flatwoods ecosystems of the Florida gulf coast. Natural Areas Journal 38 (1): 26-43.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(60)
Shen YX, Liu WL, Li YH, Guan HL (2014). Large sample area and size are needed for forest soil seed bank studies to ensure low discrepancy with standing vegetation. PLoS One 9 (8): e105235.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(61)
Sousa TR, Costa FRC, Bentos TV, Leal Filho N, Mesquita RCG, Ribeiro IO (2017). The effect of forest fragmentation on the soil seed bank of Central Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 393: 105-112.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(62)
Souza M, Müller JRV, Kurtz C, Brunetto G, Couto RR, Comin JJ (2018). Weed emergence in a soil with cover crops in an agroecological no-tillage system. Planta Daninha 36: 1-9.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(63)
Sprengelmeyer EE, Rebertus AJ (2015). Seed bank dynamics in relation to disturbance and landscape for an ant-dispersed species. Plant Ecology 216 (3): 371-381.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(64)
Stankevica K, Kalnina L, Klavins M, Cerina A, Ustupe L, Kaup E (2015). Reconstruction of the Holocene palaeoenvironmental conditions accordingly to the multiproxy sedimentary records from Lake Pilvelis, Latvia. Quaternary International 386: 102-115.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(65)
Strydom M, Veldtman R, Ngwenya MZ, Esler KJ (2017). Invasive Australian Acacia seed banks: size and relationship with stem diameter in the presence of gall-forming biological control agents. PloS One 12 (8): e0181763.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(66)
Sumberová K, Ducháček M (2017). Analysis of plant soil seed banks and seed dispersal vectors: its potential and limits for forensic investigations. Forensic Science International 270: 121-128.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(67)
Symes CT (2012). Seed dispersal and seed banks in Aloe marlothii (Asphodelaceae). South African Journal of Botany 78: 276-280.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(68)
Ter Heerdt GNJ, Verweij GL, Bekker RM, Bakker JP (1996). An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Functional Ecology 10: 144-151.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(69)
Tessema ZK, De Boer WF, Prins HHT (2016). Changes in grass plant populations and temporal soil seed bank dynamics in a semi-arid African savanna: implications for restoration. Journal of Environmental Management 182: 166-175.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(70)
Tiebel K, Huth F, Wagner S (2018). Soil seed banks of pioneer tree species in European temperate forests: a review. iForest 11: 48-57.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(71)
Van Etten EJB, Neasham B, Dalgleish S (2014). Soil seed banks of fringing salt lake vegetation in arid Western Australia - density, composition and implications for postmine restoration using topsoil. Ecological Management and Restoration 15 (3): 239-242.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(72)
Vandvik V, Klanderud K, Meineri E, Måren IE, Töpper J (2016). Seed banks are biodiversity reservoirs: species-area relationships above versus below ground. Oikos 125 (2): 218-228.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(73)
Vanstockem J, Ceusters C, Van Dyck K, Somers B, Hermy M (2018). Is there more than meets the eye? Seed bank analysis of a typical novel ecosystem, the extensive green roof. Applied Vegetation Science 21 (3): 419-430.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(74)
Warr SJ, Thompson K, Kent M (1993). Seed banks as a literature and sampling techniques. Progress in Physical Geography 17 (3): 329-347.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(75)
Zhang H, Chu LM (2013). Changes in soil seed bank composition during early succession of rehabilitated quarries. Ecological Engineering 55: 43-50.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

(1)
Elie A Padonou 0000-0002-5712-2557
Bernard Tchigossou
Bruno Djossa 0000-0002-4033-5126
School of Tropical Forestry, National University of Agriculture, BP 43 Kétou (Benin)
(2)
Elie A Padonou 0000-0002-5712-2557
Bokon A Akakpo
Bruno Djossa 0000-0002-4033-5126
Laboratory of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi, 01 BP 526, Cotonou (Benin)
(3)
Bokon A Akakpo
WASCAL, Climate Change and Human Habitat, Federal University of Technology, Minna PMB 65, Niger State (Nigeria)

Corresponding author

 
Elie A Padonou
padonouelie@gmail.com

Citation

Padonou EA, Akakpo BA, Tchigossou B, Djossa B (2022). Methods of soil seed bank estimation: a literature review proposing further work in Africa. iForest 15: 121-127. - doi: 10.3832/ifor3850-015

Academic Editor

Michele Carbognani

Paper history

Received: Apr 20, 2021
Accepted: Jan 21, 2022

First online: Mar 26, 2022
Publication Date: Apr 30, 2022
Publication Time: 2.13 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2022

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 406
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 0
Abstract Page Views: 0
PDF Downloads: 350
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 56

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 135
Overall contacts: 406
Avg. contacts per week: 21.05

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Nov 2020)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 

iForest Similar Articles

 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info