Close Home
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
vol. 11, pp. 675-684
Copyright © 2018 by the Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology
doi: 10.3832/ifor2754-011

Research Articles

Short- and long-term natural regeneration after windthrow disturbances in Norway spruce forests in Bulgaria

Nickolay Tsvetanov (1)Corresponding author, Alexander Dountchev (1), Momchil Panayotov (1), Peter Zhelev (1), Peter Bebi (2), Stefan Yurukov (1)

Introduction 

Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) is one of the most important tree species in Europe, including mountain forests in the central and southern parts of the continent. Besides playing a key ecological role, these forests are very important for timber production and, in certain areas, for their protective functions against avalanches, rockfall and soil erosion ([4], [2]). At the same time, mountain Norway spruce forests are characterized by a specific disturbance regime ([51], [26], [70], [41], [61], [60], [44]), which makes their management a challenging task. In the last decades large-scale disturbances, such as windthrows and the following bark beetle outbreaks, have affected nearly 1 million hectares of spruce forests in managed and protected areas across all parts of Western Europe ([33], [55], [51], [22], [13]), Central Europe ([11], [70], [59]), Eastern Europe ([23], [41], [60], [63], [44]), and Scandinavia ([54]).

Despite their severe impacts, natural disturbances represent an important part of mountain Norway spruce forest dynamics ([1], [59]). Disturbances such as windthrows and bark beetle outbreaks leave legacies of pre-existing tree regeneration (i.e., advance regeneration), which can contribute to the persistence of the climax species within the forest ([11], [52], [25] [13]). In the case of Norway spruce in particular, small understory trees and saplings may keep their vitality under the canopy for many years ([49], [34]) and then grow rapidly when light conditions improve after a disturbance. However, when advance regeneration is sparse, such as in younger forests, or when the disturbed area is larger than the dispersal of spruce seeds can cover, the regeneration of the disturbed forest can be dominated by pioneer species.

Understanding the role of natural disturbances within long-term forest dynamics, a part of which is post-disturbance regeneration, is increasingly important in terms of evolving management strategies and anticipated climate changes ([7], [50], [10]). These changes are likely to seriously affect Norway spruce forests ([31]). In the past, forest restoration processes after disturbances were usually guided by forest managers by harvesting the wood and planting saplings of desired species. In the last decades, however, there has been a tendency to increase the role of close-to-nature silviculture systems, which rely more on natural regeneration processes. Particularly in strict forest reserves and in the core areas of national parks, natural processes after large-scale disturbances are often left without silvicultural interventions. This raises many questions about the ability of the disturbed forests to recover without human assistance and fulfill their protection functions ([55], [52], [19], [22], [13]). At the same time, studying the recovery processes in unmanaged natural spruce forests can provide extensive, valuable information about the ecology and resilience of spruce ecosystems to natural disturbances, which is of key importance for the sustainable management of both managed and protected forests ([24], [27], [26], [4]).

Recovery processes after large-scale windthrows in spruce forests are very well studied in Northern ([29], [67], [30]) and Central Europe ([11], [68], [58], [20]). However, most studies cover shorter periods (e.g., 10 to 20 years) after disturbances, and there is therefore a lack of information on the long-term perspective of natural recovery ([21], [11], [68], [22], [13], [20], [67]). Little is known about forest dynamics related to wind-disturbance in Southeastern European mountains. For instance, the subalpine Picea-dominated forests on the Balkan Peninsula (1400-2000 m a.s.l.), which represent the most southern part of the distribution of Picea abies, are characterized by a high level of naturalness, a specific species composition (e.g., presence of endemic tree species such as Pinus peuce, Pinus heldreichii and Acer heldreichii) and a high susceptibility to wind disturbances ([44]). Some of these forests are in protected areas with limited or no intervention, making it possible to conduct long-term studies of the natural processes and particularly of regeneration after disturbances, which can be a long process in subalpine forests.

The aim of this study was to explore the regeneration processes after stand-replacing disturbances in subalpine Norway spruce forests in Southeastern Europe. We analyzed the natural regeneration following medium- and large-scale windthrows that occurred 10, 30 and 50 years ago in the Parangalitsa and the Bistrishko branishte Reserves in Bulgaria. Our specific study objectives were: (1) to examine the duration of the regeneration process in the blow-down areas; (2) to determine the temporal changes that occurred in species composition; and (3) to assess the suitability of different substrates for tree establishment.

Materials and methods 

Study sites

We studied two subalpine Picea abies forests in Bulgaria, Southeastern Europe. The first site is situated in the Parangalitsa Forest Reserve within Rila National park (42° 05′ N, 23° 28′ E), Southwestern Bulgaria (Fig. 1). The reserve was described as a primeval forest already by the first foresters who completed forest inventory measurements in the early 1930s ([12]). This was the main reason that it was declared as a strict reserve without management in 1933. The forest (250 ha) has developed without major human intervention for at least 200 years and was shaped by windthrows of various sizes ([41], [44]). It ranges from 1450 to 1950 m a.s.l. and is dominated by Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.). At lower altitudes (below 1650 m a.s.l.) Norway spruce is mixed with up to 70% silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and up to 40% European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), while close to treeline Picea abies is mixed with up to 20% Macedonian pine (Pinus peuce Griseb.), a Balkan endemic species. Additionally, Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) co-dominates some of the forest patches with a heterogeneous structure on western exposures and ridges. Other tree species occurring in the site include rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.), Salix caprea L., Betula pendula Roth and Populus tremula L. In 1962 and 1983, windthrows affected 22 and 4 ha, respectively, in Norway spruce-dominated forest patches over 150 years old. The 1962 windthrow was in several patches, the largest of which was 10 ha (Fig. 1). After the 1962 windthrow (hereafter referred to as WT-1962) most of the fallen logs were extracted, which is the only known large human intervention in the reserve, whereas the windthrow of 1983 (hereafter referred as WT-1983) was left uncleared.

Fig. 1 - Location of the three investigated windthrow study areas in (B) Parangalitsa (WT-1962 and WT-1983) and (C) Bistrishko branishte (WT-2001).

The second selected study site is the Bistrishko branishte Forest Reserve within Vitosha Nature Park (42° 33′ N, 23° 18′ E), situated above the city of Sofia (Fig. 1). The reserve was declared in 1934 to protect the last remnants of Norway spruce forests on Vitosha Mountain. Picea-dominated forests cover 650 ha at altitudes between 1400 and 1950 m a.s.l. In the lower parts (up to 1500 m a.s.l.) Norway spruce is mixed with European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Sycamore maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and Balkan maple (Acer heldreichii Orph. ex Boiss.). Before the establishment of the reserve, the area was intensively logged until the 1850s to feed locally-based metal ore production ([8]). After the Crimean War (1853-1856) this industry became less profitable, which considerably decreased the logging pressure and allowed the forests in the core area of the reserve to start regenerating. Therefore, at the beginning of 21st century the forests were predominantly homogeneous, even-aged stands not older than 140-150 years ([64], [44]). In 2001 these forests were affected by a 60 ha windthrow (WT-2001), which was followed, starting in 2003, by a massive bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) outbreak that killed the majority of the old Norway spruce trees over a 200 ha territory ([43], [44]). The disturbed area was left to natural development without any human intervention.

The climate at both sites is typical for high mountain locations, with average annual temperatures of +2.5 °C at 1950 m a.s.l. in Parangalitsa Reserve ([44]) and +2.3 °C at 1950 m a.s.l. in Bistrishko branishte Reserve ([64]). The annual precipitation amounts to 1055 mm at the first site and 1228 mm at the second, with a maximum in May-June and a minimum in August-September ([46]). The snow cover reaches 150 cm and lasts for more than 100 days. The bedrock is volcanic (granite in the Parangalitsa site, syenite and andesite in the Bistrishko branishte site). Soils are predominantly dark mountain soils (Mollic Cambisols) and brown mountain soils (Dystric and Umbric Cambisols) with sufficient depth. In some areas of Bistrishko branishte Reserve the soils lie on large spherical syenite blocks and therefore the rooting depth is limited. The herbaceous layer is dominated by Calamigrostis arundinacea (L.) Roth, Rubus ideaus L. and Vaccinium myrtillus L. ([45]). In both reserves the effect of browsing as a potential critical factor for tree regeneration ([47], [37]) was assessed as negligible because frequent sapling browsing has not been observed, the stock of ungulates in Bulgaria is low ([5]) and large predators such as wolfs and bears are present.

Sampling design and data collection

The windthrow areas at both study sites were previously identified and mapped on the basis of forest maps and orthorectified digital aerial photographs in GIS using ArcGIS® ver. 10 software (ESRI Inc., Redlands, CA, USA) by Panayotov et al. ([41]) and Panayotov & Georgiev ([43]). We established transects along altitudinal gradients in each windthrow area and set up 100 m2 sample plots (10 × 10 m) every 50 m. In total, we established 21 transects with 85 sample plots in the Parangalitsa Reserve, i.e., 16 transects with 71 plots in cleared windthrow WT-1962 and 5 transects with 14 sample plots in uncleared windthrow WT-1983. In Bistrishko branishte Reserve we established 5 transects with 53 sample plots across the windthrow area. In 2012-2014, we examined the tree regeneration in each sample plot by recording the species composition, number, diameter at breast height (DBH), height and age of all individuals. Individuals with DBH < 4 cm were recorded in eight height classes, excluding seedlings: 5-25 cm; 25-50 cm; 50-75 cm; 75-100 cm; 101-125 cm; 125-150 cm; 150-175 cm; and > 175 cm.

Because of the large size variation of the trees in the windthrow areas, we used two approaches to perform the age classification of the regeneration: (1) for individuals with DBH > 4 cm (which were recorded as trees) we collected and analyzed 336 increment cores from heights of 0.3 to 0.5 m; (2) for individuals with DBH ≤ 4 cm (i.e., saplings) we constructed age-size models based on 732 cross-sections from 36 individuals of Picea abies, 23 individuals of Abies alba, 29 individuals of Fagus sylvatica and 34 individuals of Sorbus aucuparia (explained in detail in the next section). Owing to the protection status of the studied forests, the number of saplings used for the collection of cross-sections was limited. Because of the ecological similarity and hence initial growth of Norway spruce and Silver fir saplings, in the statistical analysis the cross-sections of these two species were combined. The cross-sections were obtained from heights of 0.0 m, 0.3 m, 0.5 m, 1.0 m, 1.3 m and 2.0 m. It is worth to note that such approaches of age determination make it possible to determine the age only of the above-ground stems. It is possible that some saplings were grazed and actually occurred in a prior period, which is often the case with deciduous species such as rowan ([6], [3]). However, from the point of view of forest recovery and further dynamics, it is important to account for the development of stems with a height greater than 0.5 m because they have a greater chance of survival and display faster growth in the improved conditions after disturbances.

In addition, for sporadically registered pioneer species in the Bistrishko branishte Reserve (WT-2001), the period of germination was determined through whorl counting of the pine saplings (Pinus peuce Griseb. and Pinus sylvestris L. - [38], [69]) and through examination of the length of annual stem growth, the presence of signs of post-disturbance release and the type of regeneration substrate (i.e., intact forest floor or disturbance-induced substrates such as pits, mounds and coarse woody debris) for the broadleaves. All saplings that showed signs of post-disturbance growth release, discerned by a drastic increase in the length of the annual stem growth, were classified as advance regeneration occurring prior to the wind disturbance of 2001, whereas saplings exhibiting constant vigorous annual growth from the ground level and growing on disturbance-induced substrates were classified as post-disturbance regeneration. Owing to the different approaches for age estimation and the lower survival probability of saplings, the results for trees and saplings are shown separately.

In order to analyze the influence of the regeneration substrates on the recruitment dynamics, we examined the distribution of saplings per microsite type (pit, mound, coarse woody debris and intact forest floor - hereafter IFF). The decomposition rate of coarse woody debris (CWD) was determined following the five classes of Hunter & Schmiegelow ([17]). The coverage of the main microsites types (Tab. 1) was estimated as a percentage, which was determined in each plot using 100 relevés with 1 m2 quadrates (1 × 1 m).

Tab. 1 - Coverage of the regeneration substrate types in the sampled areas in 2015. (IFF): Intact forest floor; (CWD): coarse woody debris. (a): CWD was categorized into 5 decay states following Hunter & Schmiegelow ([17]).

Sample processing and data analysis

The collected increment cores and cross-sections were sanded with progressively finer sand papers to ensure that the cells of tree rings were clearly identifiable. The cores were then scanned at 1200 dpi resolution with an Epson Expression 11000XL® scanner and measured with the software CooRecorder ver. 7.6 (Cybis Elektronik & Data AB, Saltsjöbaden, Sweden). To ensure there were no missing rings and to determine the exact calendar year in which each tree ring was produced, we performed a crossdating procedure following standard methodology ([57]). We performed the crossdating with CDendro ver. 7.6 software (Cybis Elektronik & Data AB), using regional reference chronologies for Picea abies ([42]) and Abies alba (Panayotov M, unpublished) from our study sites. For the other species we built site-level tree-ring chronologies using cores from the sites. We used the data obtained from the cross sections to develop age-height relationship equations for the saplings with DBH ≤ 4 cm. We followed the approach of Rohner et al. ([48]) and tested twelve growth models (polynomial approach) to determine the number of years it took the saplings to reach a certain height. We considered first- to third-order polynomials for describing the relationship between sapling height and age. All polynomials were fitted to the ages and heights of the model trees in the year of coring (2012-2014). We selected the best performing model based on the highest R2 and the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The estimated ages of the sampled trees and the modeled age of saplings were grouped into age classes of 15 years distributed along a time scale with respect to the dates of the wind disturbances. We chose 15-year classes to ensure that the modeled age of the small-sized saplings plus the expected error (i.e., up to 5 years) would fit into the classes.

The normality of the regeneration distributions was checked by Shapiro-Wilk tests, which showed that all the data deviated significantly from the normal distribution. We therefore used Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests to check for significant changes in the average numbers of the regeneration on specific regeneration substrates for different periods after the disturbances.

Results 

Age distribution of the regeneration

The age distribution of the trees and saplings registered in the sample plots in the 1962, 1983 and 2001 windthrow areas showed that most of them recruited after the disturbances (Fig. 2). The best-performing equation for the Norway spruce and silver fir saplings was Age = 15.72·H0.63 (R2 = 0.917; MAE = 0.501; RMSE = 0.796); for rowan it was Age = 2.33·H0.89 (R2 = 0.966; MAE = 0.237; RMSE = 0.281) and for European beech it was Age = 1.30·H + 7.44·H2 - 3.76·H3 (R2 = 0.906; MAE = 0.117; RMSE = 0.133). The equations were fitted with data from 70% of the tree-discs, while the other 30% were used for verification. The age estimation errors at 95% from the verification samples were up to 5 years for Norway spruce and silver fir; 2 years for rowan, and 4 years for European beech. The tested DBH-Age equations for trees with DBH > 4 cm did not provide the desired accuracy and thus we analyzed the age structure based solely on the trees from which we had increment cores. They were about 20% of all trees with DBH > 4 cm in the Parangalitsa site and were relatively equally distributed across the available DBH classes. Because the cores were collected at a height of 0.3 to 0.5 m, we applied a correction to the establishment age based on the average time of growth of saplings from the ground surface to the coring height (7 years for 0.3 m height and 11 years for 0.5 m height for Norway spruce and silver fir; 2 years for 0.3 m and 4 years for 0.5 m height for rowan) obtained from the analysis of stem discs.

Fig. 2 - Regeneration distribution by 15-year periods of trees (DBH > 4 cm) and saplings (DBH ≤ 4 cm) in the Parangalitsa and the Bistrishko branishte Reserves for: (a) the 1962 windthrow; (b) the 1983 windthrow; and (c) the 2001 windthrow. Vertical arrows indicate the years of the windthrow events. Abbreviations: (b15): 15 years before the windthrow; (a15, a15-30, etc.): 15 years after the windthrow, 15-30 years after the windthrow, etc.; (Picea & Abies): Picea abies Karst. and Abies alba Mill.; (Pines): Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus peuce Grisebach; (Deciduous): Sorbus aucuparia L., Fagus sylvatica L., Salix caprea L., Betula pendula Roth, Populus tremula L., Acer heldreichii Orph. ex Boiss, and Acer pseudoplatanus L.

In WT-1962 the advance regeneration (i.e., trees established before the date of the windthrow, mainly Picea abies and Abies alba) was about 270 indiv. ha-1 in total, while the post-disturbance regeneration formed by trees and saplings, which developed during the first 30 years after the windthrow (referred to as “initial post-disturbance regeneration”), amounted to about 750 indiv. ha-1 (Fig. 2a). However, 30 years after the windthrow there was a noticeable increase in the regeneration numbers, which amounted to another 833 indiv. ha-1 (referred to as “secondary post-disturbance regeneration”). In WT-1983 the advance regeneration of Picea abies and Sorbus aucuparia, formed in the decades preceding the disturbance, amounted to around 200 indiv. ha-1 (Fig. 2b). In this windthrow area the initial post-disturbance regeneration was formed mainly during the first 15 years after the disturbance and amounted to approximately 100 indiv. ha-1. In the 15 to 30 years after the disturbance the recruitment numbers doubled to more than 300 indiv. ha-1 (Fig. 2b), which was classified as “secondary post-disturbance regeneration”. For the windthrow in Bistrishko branishte Reserve (WT-2001), the regeneration density was estimated to be 816 indiv. ha-1. The post-disturbance regeneration was 552 indiv. ha-1 (Fig. 2c), while the advance regeneration was less than half this value (264 indiv. ha-1).

Species composition of regeneration

In all studied windthrow areas Picea abies and Sorbus aucuparia were the dominating regeneration species. However, there were some differences related to the participation of pioneer species and the contribution of Sorbus aucuparia (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 - Species proportions between advance regeneration, initial post-disturbance regeneration and secondary post-disturbance regeneration: (a) 1962 windthrow; (b) 1983 windthrow; and (c) 2001 windthrow. (PCAB): Picea abies; (ABAL): Abies alba; (SOAU): Sorbus aucuparia; (FASY): Fagus sylvatica; (PISY): Pinus sylvestris; (PIPE): Pinus peuce; (SACA): Salix caprea; (BEPE): Betula pendula; (POTR): Populus tremula; (ACHE): Acer heldreichii; (ACPS): Acer pseudoplatanus.

In the cleared windthrow of 1962 in Parangalitsa Reserve (WT-1962) Norway spruce dominated the advance regeneration, as well as the initial and the secondary post-disturbance regeneration (64%, 62% and 51%, respectively), followed by silver fir (relevés 31%, 11% and 33%, respectively - Fig. 3a). The participation of rowan in the advance regeneration was low (up to 2% of all saplings and trees) and increased slightly in the initial and the secondary post-disturbance regeneration (7% and 11%, respectively). Pioneer species from the genera Salix, Betula and Pinus played a smaller role, contributing less than 15% in total, and occurred mostly in the first decades after the disturbance.

In the uncleared windthrow of 1983 in Parangalitsa Reserve (WT-1983) the advance regeneration and the post-disturbance regeneration were dominated by Picea abies (46% and 64%, respectively) and Sorbus aucuparia (28% and 26%, respectively). In the group of the most recently occurring saplings (i.e., 15-30 years after the windthrow), the difference between the two species increased but was still not significant.

The participation of the pioneer species Betula pendula, Salix caprea, Pinus sylvestris and Pinus peuce in WT-1983 decreased slightly between the initial post-disturbance regeneration and the more recently occurring one (from 10% to 7%).

In the uncleared windthrow area in Bistrishko branishte Reserve (WE-2001) the post-disturbance regeneration was dominated by broadleaved species, which accounted for 70% of all saplings and trees in this age group - mainly Sorbus aucuparia (32 %), Fagus sylvatica (21%), Salix caprea (8%) and Populus tremula (6%), while the advance regeneration was dominated by Picea abies (51%), followed by Sorbus aucuparia (27%) and Fagus sylvatica (16%).

Regeneration substrate

In terms of spatial distribution, the main regeneration substrate for the initial post-disturbance regeneration in the three studied areas was the intact forest floor (IFF), which hosted between 69 and 80% of the regeneration (Fig. 4a). This value corresponded with its total cover area, which varied between 69 and 76% (Tab. 1). In the secondary post-disturbance regeneration (Fig. 4b), occurring 15-30 years after the windthrows, the importance of the coarse woody debris (CWD) for the regeneration rose significantly in comparison to the initial post-disturbance regeneration and supported 49% of the regeneration in WT-1983 (Wilcoxon Signed Ranked test, p<0.001) and 41% in WT-1962 (p<0.001), while IFF hosted 48% and 32% of the regeneration, respectively. Despite its low cover of only up to 20%, CWD proved to be a particularly suitable substrate for the recruitment of Picea abies and Abies alba, accounting for 80% of the regeneration of these two species. The proportion of the regeneration on pits and mounds remained under 20% of the total regeneration for both the initial and the secondary regeneration (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4 - Percentage distribution of (a) the initial post-disturbance regeneration, and (b) the secondary post-disturbance regeneration per regeneration substrate in the windthrow areas WT-1962 and WT-1983 in Parangalitsa Reserve and WT-2001 in Bistrishko branishte Reserve. (IFF): Intact forest floor; (CWD): coarse woody debris.

In terms of regeneration density, i.e., regardless of the area that a specific substrate covers, the highest value for the initial post-disturbance regeneration was observed on pits and mounds (30 indiv. 100 m-2 - Fig. 5), while for the secondary regeneration the highest regeneration density was found on coarse woody debris (27 indiv. 100 m-2). Despite having the largest cover area (Tab. 1), IFF was characterized by the lowest regeneration densities, remaining under 10 indiv. 100 m-2 for both the initial and the secondary post-disturbance regeneration.

Fig. 5 - Densities of (a) the initial post-disturbance regeneration, and (b) the secondary post-disturbance regeneration per regeneration substrate in the windthrow areas WT-1962 and WT-1983 in Parangalitsa Reserve and WT-2001 in Bistrishko branishte Reserve. (IFF): Intact forest floor; (CWD): coarse woody debris.

Discussion 

Age distribution of the regeneration

Our results describe the long- and short-term regeneration of forest recovery about 10, 30 and 50 years after stand-replacing wind disturbances in two unmanaged subalpine spruce forests in Southeastern Europe, Parangalitsa and Bistrishko branishte Reserves.

In line with the results of Svoboda et al. ([58]), Panayotov et al. ([41]) and Holeksa et al. ([16]), we found that the stand reinitiation phase (after [39]) can last for more than 30-50 years after stand-replacing wind disturbances in subalpine forests.

Our results further highlight that, in a period of several decades, the forest recovery of the studied windthrow areas was characterized by initially high regeneration, followed by a decrease and then a new increase in regeneration about 30-50 years after the disturbance. We perceived these fluctuations as regeneration waves; they were more clearly expressed in the windthrow that occurred more than 50 years ago (WT-1962) but also already appeared in the windthrow that occurred 30 years ago (WT-1983).

The advance regeneration was less numerous than the post-disturbance regeneration in all investigated windthrow areas. Well-established trees with DBH > 4 cm were most numerous in the windthrows that occurred in older (age above > 150 years prior to the windthrow - [44]) forests of Parangalitsa Reserve. The initial post-disturbance regeneration was lowest in the uncleared windthrow in old-growth forest (WT-1983), which is in line with the findings of other studies ([68], [35], [20]). We note that, because of the long time span after the older disturbances in Parangalitsa reserve (30 to 50 years), a fraction of the initial post-disturbance regeneration had probably already died and the initial densities were most likely higher.

The initial larger post-disturbance regeneration and the gradual decrease in numbers in the following decades can be explained by several factors. Immediately after the windthrow events, open spaces provide suitable light conditions for regeneration. However, these spaces are quickly occupied by grass and shrub species from genera such as Rubus, Calamigrostis, Luzula, Epilobium and Vaccinium, which hinders the regeneration of Norway spruce and silver fir ([9], [21], [11], [68], [22], [13], [20], [67]). In this respect, the low recruitment densities (i.e., less than 500 indiv. ha-1) observed for the first decades (Fig. 2) were in line with other findings. The post-disturbance regeneration in the uncleared windthrow areas reached a first peak during the first 15 years after the disturbances. The number of Picea saplings (about 100 indiv. ha-1) was particularly low in the large windthrow area in Bistrishko branishte Reserve. This was probably the combined result of several factors: (i) the limited seed source due to the large size of the disturbed area (60 ha); (ii) the almost complete lack of surviving old seedling trees, due to the high intensity of the storm and probably to the former forest structure, which was homogeneous with almost a complete lack of smaller-sized trees ([44]); and (iii) the rapid large-scale mortality of mature spruce trees at the windthrow borders as result of the severe bark beetle outbreak following the wind disturbance ([43]). Seed dispersal in Picea abies is performed mostly by wind and is confined to short distances (up to about 100 m) from the trees ([32]). In addition, the windthrow area in Bistrishko branishte Reserve was quickly occupied by dense raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) communities, which covered up to 60% of the total area in the analyzed plots. In comparison, the first regeneration wave in the cleared windthrow area of 1962 in Parangalitsa Reserve lasted for three decades, presumably as a result of the longer availability of suitable regeneration substrates in the harvested terrain there. The results from the study site in Parangalitsa demonstrate that if the initial regeneration wave was not able to create a stand with a high density, a secondary regeneration can occur several decades later (in our case after about 30 years). This second regeneration wave was most likely associated with an improvement in the regeneration conditions 30 to 40 years after the windthrow, namely an increasing decomposition stage of the available coarse woody debris ([66], [65], [69]) as well as an enhanced regeneration capacity and an improved sheltering function of the young forest, which developed as a result of the growth of the advance regeneration and the initial post-disturbance regeneration in the first decades after the disturbance.

Further, our results support the finding of numerous studies that the released advance regeneration may be small in the short term but can play a decisive role in the recovery of disturbed spruce forests ([68], [52], [25], [13], [20]). For instance, in the first 15 years after the disturbances in the uncleared windthrow areas of 1983 and 2001, the advance regeneration of Picea abies was still greater than the number of newly established spruce saplings. Further, the surviving trees in the advance regeneration may play an increasingly important role in the next stages of forest recovery, which is discussed below.

Species composition

Our results show that the species composition of the regeneration in the three windthrow areas was quite similar. In line with findings from other studies ([21], [68], [22], [20]), we found that the wind disturbances created suitable conditions for re-establishment of the dominant species in the intact stands before the disturbances - Picea abies, Abies alba and Sorbus aucuparia in the Parangalitsa forest, and Picea abies and Sorbus aucuparia in the Bistrishko branishte forest. An exception was the limited participation of Sorbus aucuparia in the cleared windthrow area of 1962. Given the fact that the age of the forests affected by the 1962 and 1983 windthrows was similar, i.e., more than 150 years old ([44]), there was probably advance regeneration of rowan in the windthrow area formed in 1962 that was later damaged during the salvage logging operation. In that period wood extraction was done with the assistance of animals (oxen), which could have damaged rowan by grazing and trampling. We note that Sorbus aucuparia has an ecological position between pioneer and climax species ([11]) and, as a result of its long-term survival in the seedling bank, has often been recorded as the first tree species to colonize canopy gaps ([71]) and as a temporary co-dominant species the regeneration process, together with Picea abies ([55], [13]). Nonetheless, over the long term the presence of rowan in the stand declines because of its relatively short life-span, and Picea abies therefore usually becomes the sole dominant species.

The occurrence of pioneer species was less than expected overall and more pronounced in the first stages of the post-disturbance regeneration process. Although large-scale disturbances often lead to a considerable increase in the proportion of pioneer species ([55], [35], [18], [67]), their occurrence was sporadic in two of our study areas (WT1962 and WT1983 in Parangalitsa Reserve). In the site with the largest and most recent windthrow (WT2001), where the contribution of broadleaf species in the regeneration was higher, typical pioneers such as Salix caprea and Populus tremula were more frequent but still less numerous than Fagus sylvatica and Sorbus aucuparia. In the cleared windthrow area of 1962, where the disturbed soil cover after the salvage logging was expected to promote seed germination of pioneer species ([53], [11], [20]), the participation of Picea abies was still more than 70%. The dominance of Picea abies in the regeneration process can be explained by the harsher climate conditions in the subalpine zone, which are less favorable for broadleaf species. In addition, the fragmentation of the windthrow areas into patches of less than 10-15 ha in Parangalitsa site promoted the short-distance seed dispersal of Picea abies ([32]). At the same time, the presence of seeding pioneer trees was limited in the intact forest stands. Indeed, in forests where pioneer species were found to dominate the post-windthrow regeneration, the participation of these species was already relatively high before the disturbances ([11], [35], [68]).

The secondary regeneration occurring in later decades after the disturbance (i.e., 30-40 years later) was dominated by the dominant species, with highest participation for Picea abies, Abies alba, Sorbus aucuparia and Fagus sylvatica. Especially silver fir strongly increased its presence in the windthrow area formed in 1962 (Fig. 3). Several factors may be associated with the observed regeneration pattern. On the one hand, probably the most important factor was the increase in height and maturation of trees from the advance regeneration, which facilitated seedling dispersal (and decreased the suppressive role of the grass layer) and provided shelter for the newly established saplings. In Parangalitsa Reserve the advance regeneration was frequently composed of trees with a large DBH; at the time of sampling, these trees already had a DBH > 32 cm and an age of about 60 years for the 1962 windthrow, and a DBH > 28 cm and an age > 40 years for the 1983 windthrow. This is related to the fact that the disturbed forest was more than 150 years old and the regeneration processes had already started. Trees that established immediately after the disturbance also reached ages old enough (i.e., more than 20-30 years) to be able to provide shelter and start to regenerate ([62]). On the other hand, the species composition of the secondary post-disturbance regeneration was at least partly associated with changes in the proportion of available regeneration substrates (discussed further), of which CWD particularly assists spruce regeneration. In addition, shading by the crowns of trees decreased the proportion of grass-covered substrates. Spruce, fir and beech benefit from the reduction of grass coverage and, at the same time, can successfully regenerate in shadow or mixed shade conditions ([56]).

Regeneration substrate

The observed changes in the regeneration patterns can partly be explained by the spatial distribution and the changes in the suitable regeneration substrates in the course of the recruitment process. After large-scale wind disturbances, an increase in the area of micro-relief forms such as CWD, pits and mounds is observed ([65]). Regeneration is often concentrated on these forms because they provide suitable regeneration substrate free of ground vegetation for a longer period ([21], [29], [22]). Our data show that shortly after the wind disturbances IFF, pits and mounds were particularly important for the initial post-disturbance regeneration. Their importance quickly decreased over time, however, mainly because they were covered by Calamigrostis arundinacea and Rubus idaeus, which are perceived as highly suppressive for the establishment and growth of saplings ([11], [22], [16]).

In particular, our results confirm the importance of deadwood for the successful competitive ability of spruce and fir saplings ([21], [28], [36], [69], [58]). Initially, only a small proportion of the post-disturbance regeneration in the study sites developed on CWD, because most of the CWD had still not reached the more advanced stages of decomposition, which are suitable for sapling development ([69]). Still, we do not exclude the possibility that part of the regeneration we observed on IFF was actually established on CWD that was no longer distinguishable, especially in the site where the windthrow occurred more than 50 years ago. Twenty to thirty years after the wind disturbances in the Parangalitsa site, however, the CWD from the windblown trees had already reached the third or fourth class of decomposition, which made it a suitable substrate for regeneration ([14], [69], [15]). We found that within this period the regeneration densities on CWD tripled and were highest in the oldest windthrow site where the CWD had reached more advanced classes of decomposition (Tab. 1). As a result, nearly half of the newly established saplings in the secondary regeneration were found on CWD. Even though the deadwood was collected immediately after the 1962 windthrow, subsequent mortality of single surviving trees and trees at the borders of the windthrow areas created the opportunity for the presence of this substrate 50 years later. In our opinion, besides enhancing the regeneration capacity and sheltering functions of the first regeneration cohort, the progressive decay of deadwood gave rise to a second wave of post-disturbance regeneration. In this respect, we expect that the importance of CWD as a regeneration substrate for Picea abies in the windthrow of 2001 will increase significantly as long as the blown-down logs are sufficiently decayed ([22]) and the initial regeneration trees grow enough to start producing seeds and providing shelter. In addition, the wood decayed by mycorrhizal fungi can provide a larger supply of Ca, Mg and K cations, which are important for seedling establishment and growth ([40]).

Conclusions 

Our study covered up to 50 years of natural forest recovery after stand-replacing wind disturbances, allowing to describe and analyze the short- and long-term forest recovery in two mountain Norway spruce forests in Southeastern Europe. Our data confirm previous findings that forest recovery after medium- and large-scale wind disturbances may be a long-lasting and dynamic process. In particular, we observed two discrete peaks of post-disturbance regeneration, reflecting the changes in the availability of suitable regeneration substrates, as well as the enhanced regeneration capacity and sheltering functions of the young forest. As a result, 30-50 years after the disturbances the regeneration processes were continuing in locations where the forest canopy was still not completely closed. In both study areas the windthrows led to reestablishment of Picea abies and other species that were dominant in the studied forests before the disturbances. The occurrence of pioneer species was limited to the very first stages of the regeneration process. The most important regeneration substrates were intact forest floor in the first decades after the disturbances and coarse woody debris three to four decades later. Our data demonstrate that the resilience of subalpine spruce forests against natural disturbances in terms of regeneration capacity largely depends on the presence of advance regeneration and appropriate regeneration substrates, such as dead wood in advanced decomposition stages. These findings are highly relevant for the concept of sustainable management of mountain Norway spruce forests, both in managed and protected areas, because they suggest that the silvicultural management systems in such forests should guarantee sufficient amounts of advance regeneration and CWD.

Acknowledgements 

This research was supported by the Swiss Enlargement Contribution in the framework of the Bulgarian-Swiss Research Programme, project IZEBZO_143109 and project No. DMU 02/22/2009 of the Ministry of Science and Education of Bulgaria. The work was supported by grant no. BG05 M2OP001-2.009-0034-C01, financed by the Science and Education for Smart Growth Operational Program (2014-2020) and co-financed by the EU through the ESIF. We are grateful to Toma Tonchev for valuable comments and advice for statistical modeling and Anita Kostadinova, Velislava Shishkova, Suzana Takova, Simona Sokolova and Neli Nikolova for assistance with fieldwork. We thank Melissa Dawes for providing linguistic suggestions on the manuscript. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on a previous version of the manuscript. We express our gratitude to the Ministry of Environment and Waters of Bulgaria for permission to work in Parangalitsa and Bistrishko branishte Biosphere Reserves and the office of Rila National Park for local assistance.

References

(1)
Attiwill PM (1994). The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservative management. Forest Ecology and Management 63: 247-300.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(2)
Bebi P, Kulakowski D, Rixen C (2009). Snow avalanche disturbances in forest ecosystems - state of research and implications for management. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1883-1892.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(3)
Bergquist J, Löf M, Orlander G (2009). Effects of roe deer browsing and site preparation on performance of planted broadleaved and conifer seedlings when using temporary fences. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 24: 308-317.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(4)
Brang P, Schönenberger W, Frehner M, Schwitter R, Thormann JJ, Wasser B (2006). Management of protection forests in the European Alps: an overview. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 80: 23-44.
::Google Scholar::
(5)
Dachev B, Genov P, Dutsov A, Nikolova S, Petrov I, Vasilev V (2005). Distribution, number and use of ungulates in Bulgaria. Forest Science 3: 89-107. [in Bulgarian]
::Google Scholar::
(6)
Danell K, Duncan P, Bergström R, Pastor J (2006). Large herbivore ecology, ecosystems dynamics and conservation. Cambridge University Press Inc., Cambridge, UK, pp. 524. [ISBN 978-0-511-21964-1]
::Google Scholar::
(7)
Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S, Neilson RP, Ayres MP, Flannigan MD, Hanson PJ, Irland LC, Lugo AE, Peterson CJ, Simberloff D, Swanson FJ, Stocks BJ, Wotton BM (2001). Climate change and forest disturbances. BioScience 51: 723-734.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(8)
Deliradev P (1926). Vitosha. Gladstone Press, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp. 344. [in Bulgarian]
::Google Scholar::
(9)
Dimitrov M (1999). Succession process of vegetation in windthrow area in association Piceeto-Abietum luzulosum, Yundola Training and Experimental Forest Range. Forestry Idea 1: 13-27. [in Bulgarian]
::Google Scholar::
(10)
Donato DC, Harvey BJ, Turner MG (2016). Regeneration of montane forests 24 years after the 1988 Yellowstone fires: a fire-catalyzed shift in lower treelines? Ecosphere 7(8): e01410.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(11)
Fischer A, Lindner M, Abs C, Lasch P (2002). Vegetation dynamics in Central European forest ecosystems (near-natural as well as managed) after storm events. Folia Geobotanica 37: 17-32.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(12)
Georgiev Z (1933). Parangalitsa. Forestry Ideas 2: 16-32. [in Bulgarian]
::Google Scholar::
(13)
Heurich M (2009). Progress of forest regeneration after a large-scale Ips typographus outbreak in the subalpine Picea abies forests of the Bavarian Forest National Park. Silva Gabreta 15: 49-66.
::Google Scholar::
(14)
Holeksa J (2001). Coarse woody debris in a Carpathian subalpine spruce forest. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 120: 256-270.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(15)
Holeksa J, Zielonka T, Zywiec M (2008). Modeling the decay of coarse woody debris in a subalpine Norway spruce forest of the West Carpathians, Poland. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 415-428.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(16)
Holeksa J, Zielonka T, Zywiec M (2012). Norway spruce Picea abies regeneration and canopy disturbance in a carpathian subalpine forest. In: “Spruce: Ecology, Management and Conservation” (Nowak KI, Strybel HF eds). Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, USA, pp. 1-40. [ISBN 978-1-61942-494-4]
::Online::Google Scholar::
(17)
Hunter ML, Schmiegelow FKA (2011). Wildlife, forests and forestry: principles of managing forests for biological diversity (2nd edn). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA. pp. 259. [ISBN 978-0-13-501432-5]
::Google Scholar::
(18)
Ilisson T, Chen HYH (2009). Direct regeneration hypothesis in northern forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 735-744.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(19)
Jonášová M, Prach K (2004). Central-European mountain spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forest: regeneration of tree species after a bark beetle outbreak. Ecological Engineering 23: 15-24.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(20)
Jonášová M, Vávrová E, Cudlin P (2010). Western Carpathian mountain spruce forest after a windthrow: natural regeneration in cleared and uncleared areas. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 1127-1134.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(21)
Jehl H (2001). Die Waldentwicklung nach Windwurf in den Hochlagen des Nationalparks Bayerischer Wald [Forest development after windthrow in high elevations of the Bavarian Forest National Park]. In: “Waldentwicklung im Bergwald nach Windwurf und Borkenkäferbefall”. Hrsg. Nationalpark Bayerischer Wald, Wissenschaftl. Reihe 14: 49-98. [in German]
::Google Scholar::
(22)
Keidel S, Meyer P, Bartsch N (2008). Regeneration eines naturnahen Fichtenwaldökosystems im Harz nach großflächiger Störung [Regeneration of a natural Spruce forest ecosystem in the Harz Mountains after large scale disturbances]. Forstarchiv 79: 187-196. [in German]
::Google Scholar::
(23)
Kozulko G (2002). Sanitation clear-cutting in Belovezh forest. Russian Conservation News 30: 24-26.
::Google Scholar::
(24)
Krauchi N, Brang P, Schönenberger W (2000). Forests of mountainous regions: gaps in knowledge and research needs. Forest Ecology and Management 132: 73-82.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(25)
Kulakowski D, Veblen TT (2003). Subalpine forest development following a blowdown in the Mount Zirkel Wilderness, Colorado, USA. Journal of Vegetation Science 14 (5): 653-660.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(26)
Kulakowski D, Bebi P (2004). Range of variability of unmanaged subalpine forests. In: “Forum für Wissen 2004. Protection Forests and Natural Hazards”. WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland, pp. 47-54.
::Google Scholar::
(27)
Kuuluvainen T (2002). Natural variability of forests as a reference for restoring and managing biological diversity in boreal Fennoscandia. Silva Fennica 36 (1): 97-125.
::Google Scholar::
(28)
Kuuluvainen T, Syrianen K, Kalliola R (2002). Logs in a pristine Picea abies forest: occurrence, decay stage distribution and spatial pattern. Ecological Bulletins 49: 105-113.
::Google Scholar::
(29)
Kuuluvainen T, Kalmari R (2003). Regeneration microsites of Picea abies seedlings in a windthrow area of a boreal old-growth forest in southern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici 40: 401-413.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(30)
Kuuluvainen T, Aakala T (2011). Natural forest dynamics in boreal Fennoscandia: a review and classification. Silva Fennica 45 (5): 823-841.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(31)
Kölling C, Zimmermann L, Walentowski H (2007). Klimawandel: was geschieht mit Buche und Fichte? [Climate change: what happens with beech and spruce?] Entscheidungshilfen für den klimagerechten Waldumbau in Bayern. AFZ/Der Wald 62: 584-588. [in German]
::Google Scholar::
(32)
Lässig R, Egli S, Odermatt O, Schönenberger W, Stöckli B, Wohlgemuth T (1995). Beginn der Wiederbewaldung auf Windwurfflächen [Start of revegetation on windthrow areas]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift Forstwesen 146 (11): 893-911. [in German]
::Google Scholar::
(33)
Lässig R, Schönenberger W (2000). Nach “Lothar” und “Vivian”. Erfahrungen profitieren [Learning from experiences after “Lothar” and “Vivian”]. Wald und Holz 81: 31-35. [in German]
::Google Scholar::
(34)
Leuschner C, Ellenberg H (2017). Ecology of central European forests. SpringerNature, Switzerland, pp. 972.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(35)
Moćalov SA, Lässig R (2002). Development of two boreal forests after large-scale windthrow in the Central Urals. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 77(1/2): 171-186.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(36)
Motta R, Morales M, Nola P (2006). Human land-use, forest dynamics and tree growth at the treeline in the Western Italian Alps. Annals of Forest Science 63: 739-747.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(37)
Newton AC (2007). Forest ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp. 471.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(38)
Niklasson M (2002). A comparison of three age determination methods for suppressed Norway spruce: implications for age structure analysis. Forest and Ecology Management 161: 279-288.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(39)
Oliver CD (1981). Forest development in North America following major disturbances. Forest Ecology and Management 3: 153-168.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(40)
Ostrofsky A, Jellison J, Smith KT, Shortle WC (1997). Changes in cation concentrations in red spruce wood decayed by brown rot and white rot fungi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 567-571.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(41)
Panayotov M, Kulakowski D, Larnjeiro Dos Santos L, Bebi P (2011a). Wind disturbances shape old Norway spruce-dominated forest in Bulgaria. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 470-481.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(42)
Panayotov M, Dimitrov D, Yurukov S (2011b). Extreme climate conditions in Bulgaria - evidence from Picea abies tree rings. Silva Balcanica 12 (1): 37-46.
::Google Scholar::
(43)
Panayotov M, Georgiev D (2012). Dynamics in the Ips typographus outbreak following the 2001 windthrow in Bistrishko branishte Reserve, Bulgaria. Silva Balcanica 13 (1): 38-48.
::Google Scholar::
(44)
Panayotov M, Bebi P, Tsvetanov N, Alexandrov N, Laranjeiro L, Kulakowski D (2015). The disturbance regime of Norway spruce forest in Bulgaria. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44: 1143-1153.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(45)
Pavlov D, Tashev A, Dimitrov M (1999). Ordination of plant communities of Norway spruce forests in the Bistrishko branishte forest reserve. Research papers of the University of Forestry, section Forestry, Sofia, Bulgaria, vol. 38, pp. 29-33. [in Bulgarian]
::Google Scholar::
(46)
Raev I, Georgiev N, Rosseva L, Baikov B (1987). Tree-ring investigations of Picea abies forests in Parangalitsa biosphere reserve. In: Proceedings of the “Task Force Meeting on Methods of Dendrochronology: East/West approaches”. Krakow (Poland) 2-6 June 1986, vol. 1, pp. 195-206.
::Google Scholar::
(47)
Reimoser F, Armstrong H, Suchant R (1999). Measuring forest damage of ungulates: what should be considered. Forest Ecology and Management 120: 47-58.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(48)
Rohner B, Bugmann H, Bigler C (2013). Towards no-destructive estimation of tree age. Forest Ecology and Management 304: 286-295.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(49)
San-Miguel-Ayanz J, De Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (2016). European atlas of forest tree species. Publication Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(50)
Seidl R, Schelhaas MJ, Lexer MJ (2011). Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe. Global Change Biology 17: 2842-2852.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(51)
Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Schuck A (2003). Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Global Change Biology 9: 1620-1633.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(52)
Schönenberger W (2002). Post windthrow stand regeneration in Swiss mountain forests: the first ten years after the 1990 storm Vivian. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 77: 61-80.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(53)
Schönenberger W, Wasem U (1999). Der Beginn der Wiederbewaldung von Sturmwurfflächen im Gebirge. Ein Zwischenbericht [Start of revegetation on windthrow areas in the mountains. An intermediate report]. Forstliche Forschung ber Münch 176: 102-110. [in German]
::Google Scholar::
(54)
Skogsstyrelsen (2005). The storm in Sweden and measures taken by the Swedish forest administration. National board of forestry, 25 January 2005, pp. 1-2.
::Google Scholar::
(55)
Siegrist J (2000). Natürliche Wiederbewaldung und Struktur eines ungeräumten Fichten-Windwurfs auf potentiellem Bergmischwaldstandort im Nationalpark Berchtesgaden [Natural regeneration and structure of an uncleared Spruce windthrow on a potential mixed mountain forest site in Berchtesgaden National park]. In: Nationalparkverwaltung Berchtesgaden (Hrsg) Waldentwicklung im Nationalpark Berchtesgaden von 1983 bis 1997. Nationalpark Berchtesgaden Forschungsbericht 43: 93-146. [in German]
::Google Scholar::
(56)
Stancioiu P, O’Hara K (2006). Morphological plasticity of regeneration subject to different levels of canopy cover in mixed-species, multiaged forests of the Romanian Carpathians. Trees 20: 196-209.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(57)
Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1996). An introduction to tree-ring dating. The University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, USA, pp. 73.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(58)
Svoboda M, Fraver S, Janda P, Bace R, Zenáhliíková J (2010). Natural development and regeneration of a central European montane spruce forest. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 707-714.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(59)
Svoboda M, Janda P, Nagel TA, Fraver S, Rejzek J, Bače R (2011). Disturbance history of an old-growth sub-alpine Picea abies stand in the Bohemian Forest, Czech Republic. Journal of Vegetation Science 23 (1): 86-97.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(60)
Svoboda M, Janda P, Nagel TA, Fraver S, Rejzek J, Mikoláš M, Douda J, Boublik K, Samonil P, Cada V, Trotsiuk V, Teodosiu M, Bouriaud O, Biris AI, Sykora O, Uzel P, Zelenka J, Sedlak V, Lehejcek J (2014). Landscape-level variability in historical disturbance in primary Picea abies mountain forests of the Eastern Carpathians, Romania. Journal of Vegetation Science 25: 386-401.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(61)
Temperli C, Bugmann H, Elkin C (2013). Cross-scale interactions among bark beetles, climate change, and wind disturbances: a landscape modeling approach. Ecological Monographs 83: 383-402.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(62)
Tjoelker M, Boratynski A, Bugala W (2007). Biology and ecology of Norway spruce. Forestry Sciences vol. 78, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 474.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(63)
Trotsiuk V, Svoboda M, Janda P, Mikoláš M, Bače R, Rejzek J, Samonil P, Chaskovskyy O, Korol M, Myklush S (2014). A mixed severity disturbance regime in the primary Picea abies (L.) Karst. forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Forest Ecology Management 334: 144-153.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(64)
Tsvetanov N, Panayotov M (2013). Age structure and historical development of forests in “Bistrishko branishte” Biosphere Reserve in Vitosha Mountain (Bulgaria). Ecologica Balkanica 5 (1): 129-136.
::Google Scholar::
(65)
Ulanova NG (2000). The effects of windthrow on forest at different spatial scales: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 135: 155-167.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(66)
Veblen TT (1992). Regeneration dynamics. In: “Plant Succession: Theory and Prediction” (Glenn-Lewin DC, Peet RK, Veblen TT eds). Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 152-187.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(67)
Vodde F, Jogiste K, Gruson L, Ilisson T, Koster K (2010). Regeneration in windthrow areas in hemiboreal forests: the influence of microsite on the height growths of different tree species. Journal of Forest Research 15 (1): 55-64.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(68)
Wohlgemuth T, Kull P, Wüthrich H (2002). Disturbance of microsites and early tree regeneration after windthrow in Swiss mountain forests due to the winter storm Vivian 1990. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 77 (1/2): 17-47.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(69)
Zielonka T (2006). When does dead wood turn into a substrate for spruce replacement? Journal of Vegetation Science 17: 739-746.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(70)
Zielonka T, Holeksa J, Fleischer P, Kapusta P (2010). A tree-ring reconstruction of wind disturbances in a forest of the Slovakian Tatra Mountains, Western Carpathians. Journal of Vegetation Science 21 (1): 31-42.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(71)
Zywiec M, Ledwon M (2008). Spatial and temporal patterns of rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) regeneration in West Carpathian subalpine spruce forest. Plant Ecology 194: 283-291.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

Download

Paper Contents

Paper Sections

Paper Figures

Paper Tables

 
 
Close

 

Tsvetanov N, Dountchev A, Panayotov M, Zhelev P, Bebi P, Yurukov S (2018).
Short- and long-term natural regeneration after windthrow disturbances in Norway spruce forests in Bulgaria
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 11: 675-684. - doi: 10.3832/ifor2754-011
Close
First Previous Next Last
 
Close
© iForest

Download Reference

Paper ID# ifor2754-011
Title Short- and long-term natural regeneration after windthrow disturbances in Norway spruce forests in Bulgaria
Authors Tsvetanov N, Dountchev A, Panayotov M, Zhelev P, Bebi P, Yurukov S
Format
Close Download