## Allometric relationships for predicting the stem volume in a *Dalbergia sissoo* Roxb. plantation in Bangladesh

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 153-158 (2010)

doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0554-003

Published: Nov 15, 2010 - Copyright © 2010 SISEF

Research Articles

### Abstract

Allometric relationships for estimating stem volumes of *Dalbergia sissoo* Roxb. (Sissoo) trees were investigated in monoculture plantations in Bangladesh. The various allometric relationships between stem volume and different dimensions were tested and the coefficient of determination R^{2} values were used to compare the strength of the relationships. Although the allometric equations were highly significant (P<0.01) there was considerable variation among them as indicated by the R^{2} values. Our results suggested that tree volume is more correlated with basal area than with simple D (stem diameter at 1.3 m height above the ground). The allometric relationships of stem volume to the tree diameter at 10% of tree height (D_{0.1}) did not improve the allometric strength in comparison with simple D as reported in case of some other tree species. The multiplication of tree height H with D in the allometric equation gives a little improvement in the degree of fitness of the allometric equations. However, for the Sissoo plantations studied the stem dbh alone showed a very strong accuracy of estimation (R^{2} = 0.997) especially when used as D^{2}. It is concluded that the use of tree height in the allometric equation can be neglected for the species, as far as the present study area is concerned. Therefore, for estimating the stem volume of Sissoo, the use of D^{2} as an independent variable in the allometric equation with a linear or quadratic equation is recommended. The paper describes details of tree volume allometry, which is important in silviculture and forest management.

### Keywords

Allometry, Monoculture plantation, Regression, Rosewood, Sissoo, Stem volume

# Introduction

Sissoo is known as a premier timber species of the rosewood genus with the common name sissoo in Bangladesh. It is native to Sub-Himalayan zone including India, Pakistan and Afghanistan ([35], [20]). It is also recognized as an important species for fuel wood, shade tree, agroforestry and fodder in the region ([35], [34], [13]). Foresters traditionally derive timber volumes by employing allometric techniques. Allometric relationship for estimating stand volume as well as forest biomass is very important for managing any natural and artificial forest resources ([5], [10], [22], [24]). In the estimation of stand volume, the uncertainties appear due to the measurements of basal area and the use of a mean form factor, which is related to mean tapering ([24]). Thus, allometric relationships offer better estimates of the forest standing volume, which is also an important parameter in further research such as biomass and carbon-emission estimates avoiding the uncertainties in the bole-volume estimates ([16], [24]). Therefore, choosing a suitable functional variable in the allometric equation is very important for allometric techniques in forest science ([16], [17]).

There are various independent variables in the allometric relationships to estimate biomass. In most studies, *D* (dbh, stem diameter at 1.3 m height above the ground) was taken as the only independent variable in the allometric equation (*e.g.*, [23], [29], [12], [1], [11], [26]). However, incorporation of the variable *H* (tree height - *i.e.*, the use of *D*^{2}*H*) ensures higher accuracy of allometric estimation in some tree species ([32], [33], [18], [28]). Moreover, the use of the new variable *D*_{0.1}^{2}*H* (*D*_{0.1}, diameter at one-tenth of *H*) instead of *D*^{2}*H* has been suggested to improve the accuracy of estimation ([25], [14], [17]). Attiwill ([3]) found a strong allometric relationship between the girth (at the point immediately before branching) of main branches of a tree and branch dry weight in a stand of *Eucalyptus obliqua* L’ Herit. The use of *D*_{B} (stem diameter at a height of clear bole length) provides better results in estimating the weight of branch and leaf, and leaf area per tree, as described by the pipe model theory of Shinozaki et al. ([30]). Various allometric equations have been developed from different tropical species ([7], [27], [6], [2], [9], [16], [10]). It is evident that mainly species of dicotyledonous trees differ in allometry because of distinctive bole shape. The allometric equations developed from various species yield useful estimates for large-scale inventories.

In this paper, we seek to establish the allometric relationships of the stem volume of individual trees to different dimensions, such as *D*, *D*^{2}, *D*^{2}*H*, *D*_{0.1}, *D*_{0.1}^{2} and *D*_{0.1}^{2}*H* and to propose a standard method for predicting the stem volume of Sissoo.

# Materials and methods

## Study site and species description

The study was carried out in block plantations at Khulna located in the southern part of Bangladesh (Fig. 1). The area belongs to subtropical region. *Dalbergia sissoo* is one of the important plantation species in the region.

The species is a strong-light demander and shows good coppicing ability ([35]). The development of seedling is better in full overhead light than under partial shade. It is capable of growing under adverse soil and moisture conditions ([34]). Though, *D. sissoo* is a frost hardy species, its young leaves are adversely affected by severe frost and even the poles get completely defoliated ([31]). It has a complex root system that consists of a deep tap root and long lateral roots. Root suckers are produced from the lateral roots. Root suckers develop towards the end of the rainy season and may attain a height of more than 2 m on good soil ([15]). The species can grow naturally up to 1500 m elevation. The temperature in its native range averages 12-22 °C, but varies from just below freezing to nearly 50 °C with an average annual rainfall of 500 to 2000 mm with a monsoonal pattern and drought period of 3-4 months ([35]). The growth of the bole is crooked and straight logs of any great length are difficult to obtain. The heartwood is brown with darker streaks and because of its strength and durability, the wood is highly valued for furniture, constructional and general utility purposes.

## Sampling, data collection and analysis

All the studies were carried out in May 2006 in a monoculture plantation of *D. sissoo* where the canopy was completely closed. A destructive sampling of 30 individual trees with a wide range of diameter and height were used for this study (Tab. 1). The following measurements were carried out: tree height *H*, stem diameter at a height of *H*/10 (*D*_{0.1} - [17]), stem dbh *D* and stem diameter at 1.0 m interval thereafter up to the merchantable height (stem height at 10 cm diameter). For measuring the diameter, girth values were converted to diameter after divided with π. Stem volume was calculated using the Smalian’s formula ([4]).

**Tab. 1 - **Description of sissoo sample trees used for this study. *H*: Tree height; *D*_{0.1}: stem diameter at a height of *H*/10; *D*: stem diameter at 1.3 m height (dbh); *V*: stem volume.

Tree No. | D (cm) | D_{0.1} (cm) | H (m) | V (cm^{3}) |
---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 9.549 | 10.027 | 9.01 | 10403.4 |

2 | 9.708 | 10.504 | 8.01 | 17653.9 |

3 | 10.134 | 11.141 | 8.02 | 25678.3 |

4 | 10.663 | 10.982 | 9.01 | 20521.2 |

5 | 10.759 | 11.459 | 8.07 | 27829.2 |

6 | 11.141 | 11.937 | 9.03 | 14610.4 |

7 | 11.513 | 12.414 | 7.50 | 36859.9 |

8 | 11.678 | 13.051 | 8.02 | 37520.3 |

9 | 11.937 | 11.937 | 9.75 | 38089.3 |

10 | 12.321 | 12.573 | 8.50 | 41628.1 |

11 | 12.614 | 12.892 | 8.50 | 46894.1 |

12 | 12.984 | 12.796 | 12.01 | 51629.2 |

13 | 13.210 | 13.528 | 11.03 | 62953.1 |

14 | 13.242 | 13.210 | 11.02 | 56349.9 |

15 | 13.687 | 13.433 | 10.25 | 57361.4 |

16 | 13.866 | 14.006 | 10.25 | 36131.8 |

17 | 14.006 | 14.324 | 8.50 | 60054.8 |

18 | 14.961 | 14.801 | 14.01 | 89369.7 |

19 | 15.597 | 15.756 | 14.04 | 101757.4 |

20 | 16.470 | 16.870 | 14.02 | 128149.9 |

21 | 16.999 | 17.666 | 11.01 | 139271.9 |

22 | 17.189 | 17.507 | 10.75 | 122993.6 |

23 | 21.963 | 22.282 | 12.50 | 206910.6 |

24 | 26.897 | 26.420 | 15.10 | 411254.8 |

25 | 27.056 | 26.420 | 15.00 | 390567.9 |

26 | 27.693 | 27.693 | 14.75 | 437078.1 |

27 | 29.155 | 28.254 | 20.05 | 569421.1 |

28 | 31.210 | 29.155 | 20.02 | 665874.1 |

29 | 32.675 | 30.152 | 20.50 | 759421.1 |

30 | 33.423 | 31.831 | 21.75 | 819421.1 |

The simple allometric equation is generally written using the power curve ([17]) in the form (eqn. 1):

where *y* is the dependent variable and *x* is the independent variable, and *a* the coefficient and *b* the allometric constant. The equation is linearized by taking logarithms, as follows (eqn. 2):

where ln *a* and *b* are the intercept and slope of the regression line, respectively. The ln *a* and *b* are obtained by the method of least squares. In this study, the allometric relationships of the volume and different dimensions such as *D*, *D*^{2}, *D*^{2}*H*, *D*_{0.1}, *D*_{0.1}^{2} and *D*_{0.1}^{2}*H* were also established using following equations (eqn. 3, eqn. 4, eqn. 5, eqn. 6, eqn. 7):

The coefficient of determination *R*^{2} was calculated using the following equation (based on the real data before logarithmic transformation - eqn. 8):

where *y*_{i} is the observed value, *y*_{ei} is the corresponding values calculated from the regression line, and *y*_{mi} is the mean of the observed values ([19]). The *R*^{2} value (coefficient of determination) is a measure of the goodness-of-fit between the observed and calculated values ([17]).

# Results

Various allometric equations were developed for data fitting. The allometric relationships of stem volume of sissoo trees to *D* and* D*^{2} are illustrated in Fig. 2. The scatter plot shows a non-linear trend when *D* is used as independent variable. This trend is changed to linear distribution if *D*^{2} is used (Fig. 2). This is also illustrated by the coefficient of determination using *D*, where the power equation (*R*^{2} = 0.970) shows better fitting than linear equation (*R*^{2} = 0.944). When *D* values are squared, the linear equation shows stronger relationship (*R*^{2} = 0.983) than power equation (*R*^{2} = 0.970 - Tab. 2). In this case, the polynomial cubic equation showed the best fit for both *D* (*R*^{2} = 0.997) and *D*^{2} (*R*^{2} = 0.996) with a very close estimate by the quadratic equation for *D* (*R*^{2} = 0.993) and *D*^{2} (*R*^{2} = 0.996).

**Tab. 2 - **Summarized coefficients of the relationships between individual tree volumes of Sissoo to different independent variables. *H*: Tree height; *D*_{0.1}: stem diameter at a height of *H*/10; *D*: stem diameter at 1.3 m height (dbh). The units: *D* = [cm], D_{0.1} = [cm], *H*]= [m]. LIN = Linear, LOG = Logarithmic, QUA = Quadratic, CUB = Cubic, POW = Power, EXP = Exponential.

Variable | Equation | a | b | c | d | R^{2} | F | Sign. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

D | LIN | -342298 | 30629.2 | - | - | 0.944 | 474.4 | < 0.01 |

LOG | -1E+06 | 561873 | - | - | 0.869 | 186.3 | < 0.01 | |

QUA | 145717 | -24827 | 1322.63 | - | 0.993 | 1925.9 | < 0.01 | |

CUB | -203182 | 34316.7 | -1754.7 | 49.327 | 0.997 | 2588.8 | < 0.01 | |

POW | 15.91 | 3.108 | - | - | 0.97 | 902.6 | < 0.01 | |

EXP | 5528 | 0.159 | - | - | 0.928 | 361.7 | < 0.01 | |

D^{2} | LIN | -75972 | 739.7 | - | - | 0.983 | 1660.3 | < 0.01 |

LOG | -1E+06 | 280937 | - | - | 0.869 | 186.3 | < 0.01 | |

QUA | -13315 | 317.6 | 0.3825 | - | 0.996 | 3517 | < 0.01 | |

CUB | -31764 | 487.7 | 0.0288 | 0.0002 | 0.996 | 2462.9 | < 0.01 | |

POW | 15.91 | 1.554 | - | - | 0.97 | 902.6 | < 0.01 | |

EXP | 23664 | 0.0036 | - | - | 0.867 | 182.3 | < 0.01 | |

D_{0.1} | LIN | -390344 | 33385.1 | - | - | 0.925 | 343 | < 0.01 |

LOG | -2E+06 | 611406 | - | - | 0.86 | 172.4 | < 0.01 | |

QUA | 275457 | -42005 | 1844.01 | - | 0.981 | 696.3 | < 0.01 | |

CUB | -445256 | 80012.7 | -4601.5 | 106.354 | 0.989 | 782.3 | < 0.01 | |

POW | 7.04 | 3.385 | - | - | 0.961 | 695.9 | < 0.01 | |

EXP | 4172 | 0.1752 | - | - | 0.928 | 362.9 | < 0.01 | |

D_{0.1}^{2} | LIN | -99651 | 828.7 | - | - | 0.964 | 742.6 | < 0.01 |

LOG | -2E+06 | 305703 | - | - | 0.86 | 172.4 | < 0.01 | |

QUA | 7859 | 104.7 | 0.7173 | - | 0.987 | 1043.7 | < 0.01 | |

CUB | -30223 | 453.3 | -0.0564 | 0.0005 | 0.988 | 721.3 | < 0.01 | |

POW | 7.04 | 1.693 | - | - | 0.961 | 695.9 | < 0.01 | |

EXP | 20529 | 0.0042 | - | - | 0.881 | 207.6 | < 0.01 | |

D_{2}H | LIN | -5209 | 34.9 | - | - | 0.995 | 5738.1 | < 0.01 |

LOG | -1E+06 | 205386 | - | - | 0.877 | 199 | < 0.01 | |

QUA | -15721 | 40.2 | -0.0002 | - | 0.997 | 4000.6 | < 0.01 | |

CUB | -17734 | 41.7 | -0.0004 | 4.90E-09 | 0.997 | 2584.4 | < 0.01 | |

POW | 11 | 1.125 | - | - | 0.959 | 656.2 | < 0.01 | |

EXP | 35224 | 0.0002 | - | - | 0.785 | 102.3 | < 0.01 | |

D_{0.1}^{2} H | LIN | -18747 | 39.3 | - | - | 0.995 | 5791.8 | < 0.01 |

LOG | -2E+06 | 219854 | - | - | 0.877 | 199.2 | < 0.01 | |

QUA | -20488 | 40.2 | -5.00E-05 | - | 0.995 | 2811.9 | < 0.01 | |

CUB | -10661 | 33 | 0.0008 | -3.00E-08 | 0.996 | 1959.7 | < 0.01 | |

POW | 5.65 | 1.204 | - | - | 0.959 | 654.2 | < 0.01 | |

EXP | 32624 | 0.0002 | - | - | 0.808 | 118.1 | < 0.01 |

Fig. 3 illustrates the allometric relationships of stem volume to *D*_{0.1} and *D*_{0.1}^{2}. As observed with the variable *D*, the use of *D*_{0.1 } alsoshowed strong data fitting (*R*^{2} = 0.925) in the allometry (Tab. 2). This relationship is further improved (*R*^{2} = 0.964) when the *D*_{0.1} value is squared. The power equation for both the variables *D*_{0.1} and *D*_{0.1}^{2} showed the same coefficient of determination (*R*^{2} = 0.961). For both the variables *D*_{0.1} and *D*_{0.1}^{2} the polynomial cubic and quadratic equations showed a slight stronger fitting (Tab. 2) in comparison with other equations.

As illustrated in Fig. 4, the incorporation of tree height *H* in the allometric equation gives a better fitting in the linear equation, specially for both *D*^{2}*H* (*R*^{2} = 0.995) and *D*_{0.1}^{2}*H* (*R*^{2} = 0.995). The polynomial cubic along with the quadratic equation showed a very close fit in comparison with the linear equation for both variables *D*^{2}*H* and *D*_{0.1}^{2}*H* (Tab. 2).

# Discussion

Although the allometric equations were highly significant (*P* < 0.01) there was considerable variation among them as indicated by the coefficient of determination *R*^{2} values (Tab. 2). The scatter plotting (Fig. 2) shows a non-linear trend for *D* as independent variable, which becomes linear when plotted against *D*^{2}. This indicates that tree volume is more correlated with basal area than with simple dbh ([8]). Using the simple *D* as independent variable in the allometric equation, the cubic equation showed the best fit (*R*^{2} = 0.997) with a very close estimate by the quadratic equation (*R*^{2} = 0.993). However, there were low differences in the goodness-of-fit among the polynomial, power and linear equations. As the quadratic and cubic equations consist of several coefficients, for practical applications in stand volume estimation, because of simplicity, the linear or power equations the use of *D*^{2} as an independent variable should be preferred ([17]).

Like the commonly known variable *D*, the use of *D*_{0.1 } also showed strong linear data fitting (*R*^{2} = 0.925) in the allometry (Tab. 2). This degree of linearity was further improved (*R*^{2} = 0.964) when *D*_{0.1}^{2} value is used instead of *D*_{0.1} ([14], [17]). Here, the cubic equation showed the best fit for both *D*_{0.1} (*R*^{2} = 0.989) and *D*_{0.1}^{2} (*R*^{2} = 0.988). The next strong fit is also from the quadratic equation for *D*_{0.1} (*R*^{2} = 0.981) and *D*_{0.1}^{2} (*R*^{2} = 0.987). Overall, it may be remarked that the allometric relationships of stem volume to the tree diameter at 10% of tree height (*D*_{0.1}) did not improve the allometric strength in *D. sissoo* in comparison with simple *D*, as reported in case of some tree species ([14], [17]).

The multiplication of tree height *H* with diameter or basal area in the allometric equation gives high degree of linearity for both the variables* D*^{2} *H* (*R*^{2} = 0.995) and *D*_{0.1}^{2}*H* (*R*^{2} = 0.995) in the allometric estimation. This suggests that biologically tree diameter and height change proportionality with the change of tree size ([17]). Hence, *H* is incorporated in the allometric equations, the polynomial cubic and quadratic equations showed a similar degree of fitting in comparison with linear equation for both the variables *D*^{2}*H* and *D*_{0.1}^{2}*H*, because of simplicity, the linear equation would be preferred for indirect estimation in the field with a good level of accuracy (*R*^{2} = 0.995).

For predicting timber yield ([21]) foresters often combine trunk diameter and height measurements ([21], [4]) as the independent variables in allometric relationships. However, for the* D. sissoo* plantations studied the stem dbh alone showed a very strong accuracy of estimation (*R*^{2} = 0.983 to 0.997) especially when used as *D*^{2}. Thus, it is concluded that the use of tree height in the allometric equation ([32], [18], [28], [17]) can be neglected for *D. sissoo*, as far as the present study area is concerned. Therefore, for estimating the stem volume of sissoo, the use of *D*^{2} as an independent variable in the allometric equation with a linear or quadratic equation is recommended.

The findings of this study indicate that there is a variation in the use of independent variables in allometric equations for estimating the stem volume of the species. The allometric relationships described in this paper may not be appropriate in mixed or open forest stands, because the present study was carried out under monospecific and closed canopy conditions. For estimation stem volume of trees outside the size range of this investigation, care should be taken in extrapolating the present allometric relationships. Therefore, users of these allometric equations are recommended to check some individual trees outside the present size class.

# Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Forestry and Wood Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Bangladesh for providing logistic support for the field data collection. The data analysis and manuscript preparation were performed in the Institute of Forest Growth and Forest Computer Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany, which was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung / Foundation, Germany.

# References

Gscholar

Gscholar

CrossRef | Gscholar

Gscholar

Gscholar

Gscholar

*Chamaecyparis obtusa*(Sieb. et Zucc.) Endl.) trees. Bulletin of Nagoya University Forestry 12: 11-29.

Gscholar

Gscholar

CrossRef | Gscholar

Gscholar

Gscholar

Gscholar

Gscholar

Gscholar

Gscholar

*Dalbergia sissoo*Roxb. Indian Council on Forestry Resource and Education, International Books Distributors, Deharadun, India.

Gscholar

Gscholar

### Authors’ Info

#### Authors’ Affiliation

Department Forest Biometry and Systems Analysis, Institute of Forest Growth and Forest Computer Sciences, TU Dresden, P.O. Box 1117, D-01735 Tharandt (Germany)

#### Corresponding author

### Paper Info

#### Citation

Khan NI, Faruque O (2010). Allometric relationships for predicting the stem volume in a *Dalbergia sissoo* Roxb. plantation in Bangladesh. iForest 3: 153-158. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0554-003

#### Paper history

**Received: **Mar 04, 2010**Accepted: **Oct 01, 2010

**First online: **Nov 15, 2010**Publication Date: **Nov 15, 2010**Publication Time: **1.50 months

### Copyright Information

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2010

#### Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

### Web Metrics

#### Breakdown by View Type

#### Article Usage

**Total Article Views: **29376

(from publication date up to now)

**Breakdown by View Type**

HTML Page Views: 22588

Abstract Page Views: 1417

PDF Downloads: 4249

Citation/Reference Downloads: 32

XML Downloads: 1090

**Web Metrics**

Days since publication: 4202

Overall contacts: 29376

Avg. contacts per week: 48.94

### Article Citations

*Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site(last update: Nov 2020)*

Total number of cites (since 2010): **9**

Average cites per year: **0.82**

#### Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ^{©}

### Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on **CrossRef Cited-by**.

### Related Contents

#### iForest Similar Articles

Research Articles

Tree volume modeling for forest types in the Atlantic Forest: generic and specific models

vol. 13, pp. 417-425 (online: 16 September 2020)

Research Articles

On the geometry and allometry of big-buttressed trees - a challenge for forest monitoring: new insights from 3D-modeling with terrestrial laser scanning

vol. 8, pp. 574-581 (online: 02 March 2015)

Research Articles

A rapid method for estimating the median diameter of the stem profile of Norway spruce (*Picea abies* Karst) trees

vol. 10, pp. 328-333 (online: 11 February 2017)

Research Articles

Integrating area-based and individual tree detection approaches for estimating tree volume in plantation inventory using aerial image and airborne laser scanning data

vol. 10, pp. 296-302 (online: 15 December 2016)

Research Articles

The use of tree crown variables in over-bark diameter and volume prediction models

vol. 7, pp. 132-139 (online: 13 January 2014)

Research Articles

Nonlinear mixed model approaches to estimating merchantable bole volume for *Pinus occidentalis*

vol. 5, pp. 247-254 (online: 24 October 2012)

Technical Reports

Biomass equations for European beech growing on dry sites

vol. 9, pp. 751-757 (online: 17 June 2016)

Research Articles

Simplified methods to inventory the current annual increment of forest standing volume

vol. 5, pp. 276-282 (online: 17 December 2012)

Research Articles

Alternative methods of scaling *Eucalyptus urophylla* trees in forest stands: compatibility and accuracy of volume equations

vol. 11, pp. 275-283 (online: 29 March 2018)

Research Articles

Estimation of above-ground biomass and sequestered carbon of Taurus Cedar (*Cedrus libani *L.) in Antalya, Turkey

vol. 6, pp. 278-284 (online: 01 July 2013)

#### iForest Database Search

**Search By Author**

**Search By Keyword**

#### Google Scholar Search

**Citing Articles**

**Search By Author**

**Search By Keywords**

#### PubMed Search

**Search By Author**

**Search By Keyword**