iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Diversity, distribution and vegetation assessment in the Jahlmanal watershed in cold desert of the Lahaul valley, north-western Himalaya, India

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 65-71 (2010)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0532-003
Published: May 17, 2010 - Copyright © 2010 SISEF

Research Articles

Relict vegetation in the Jahlmanal watershed is sparsely and scantily distributed on forest land. Farmers maintain tree species (Salix spp., Populus spp., Hippophae rhamnoides) on the boundaries of terraced agriculture fields to meet the fodder and fuel wood requirements. Juniperus macropoda was found in relict forest patches in sparse and stunted conditions. The density of Salix fragilis was 3340 trees ha-1 under agroforestry and 5520 trees ha-1 under forestry. The density of J. macropoda was 4200 tree ha-1 in natural forest followed by 700 tree ha-1 in agroforestry and 160 tree ha-1 in managed forestry systems. The agroforesty system of the watershed consists of 30% trees, 35% small trees and 35% shrubs species. Shrubs contributed the highest density with 59.1% of the total, followed by density of trees (29.5%) and small trees (11.3%). Trees contributed highest basal area in all the three systems, i.e., agroforestry, forestry and forest. The relict forest patches are subjected to deforestation due to anthropogenic pressure, hence in-situ and ex-situ conservation are required. Efforts are needed for plantation of ecologically suitable multipurpose tree species with indigenous species in the watershed. Technological interventions are also required to improve the quality and resistance against drought and climate change.

Vegetation analysis, Agroforestry, Forestry, Forest, Watershed, Lahaul valley, Cold desert, Indian Himalaya


Nearly 74 809 km2 area of India falls under cold deserts, of which about 35% is in Himachal Pradesh ([1]). Of the total area of cold desert, 25% of the area occurs in Lahaul and Spiti division of the Lahaul-Spiti district. The Jahlmanal watershed falls within the Lahaul division, the Jahlma nala (the main stream of watershed) is one of the tributaries of the River Chandra-Bhaga (Chenab). In the watershed, land use pattern has changed from traditional subsistence farming to high yielding variety of cash crops, vegetables and fruits ([32], [20]). These changes are primarily responsible for degrading the quality of environment and vegetation pattern in a system. Among the prime land use components, the forest cover in the watershed is under a tremendous change due to anthropogenic pressure since a last couple of decades ([38], [39], [26]). The vegetation pattern in the watershed mainly include dry temperate and alpine ([2], [3], [4]). Forest cover is very poor in the watershed and high anthropogenic pressures are observed in relict forest patches. A century back, there were evidences of dense Juniperus forests in the watershed area. However, due to illegal harvesting of the forests for fuelwood, timber and other religious purposes ([25]), there are now very few isolated and patchy pockets of Juniperus forests in the watershed ([2]).

Scant rainfall, massive snowfall, high wind velocity, extreme temperature conditions from low to high, high UV radiation, intense solar radiation and extremely xeric conditions are the common features of the watershed similarly as cold desert. These climatic factors determine and regulate the life process and distribution pattern of the vegetation ([40], [8]). Generally, an extreme cold climatic condition of the watershed is reflected in the existing vegetation ([13], [25]). Vegetation is very sparsely distributed in three systems (i.e., agroforestry, forestry and forest) in the watershed. However, most of the south facing slopes is denuded.

At present, nearly 7.9% area of the district Lahaul-Spiti is under scant forest cover ([2]). Scattered patches of Betula utilis and Pinus wallichiana on north-facing slopes, and Juniperus macropoda patches occur on dry south facing slopes. Around settlements willow based agroforestry systems, and willow and poplar plantation are found. These make up the basic cold desert vegetation elements of the Lahaul valley ([25]). An agro-ecosystem with willow (Salix spp.) based agroforestry and forestry (willow plantation; hereafter referred as forestry in the text) are the main source of fuelwood and fodder in the Lahaul valley ([32], [14], [15], [38], [39], [25]). There are two species of willow (Salix fragilis and S. alba) which are widely cultivated and 10 other wild shrub species of willow are also found in the valley ([4]).

A few studies have been conducted so far in the Lahaul valley related to indigenous knowledge ([32]), ethno-botanical studies of the plant taxa ([35]), fuelwood production and multi-purpose uses of the Seabuckthorn ([14]), energy and monetary efficiencies of introduced cash versus traditional crops ([15]), and cultivation prospects of Saussurea costus and the causes of its decline in the Lahaul valley ([24], [13]). Studies have also been conducted on land use and land cover changes in the Jahlmanal watershed and traditional kuhl irrigation systems and water sharing mechanism through kuhl of the cold desert in the Lahaul valley ([20], [38], [39]). Therefore, present study deals with vegetation analysis of natural forests, agroforestry and forestry systems with following objectives:

  • diversity, distribution, density, basal area and importance value indices (IVI);
  • utilization pattern;
  • species richness;
  • vegetation characteristics and conservation.

  Study area and climate 

Geographical location

Jahlmanal watershed, which is in the area of a proposed biosphere reserve, is a typical representative of the Lahaul valley. The watershed is situated almost in the centre of the valley. The watershed in the Lahaul valley is located at the bank of the Chandra-Bhaga or Chenab river on the Keylong-Udaipur road (Fig. 1) and occupies approximately 33 km2. The watershed starts at the confluence of Jahlmanal and Chandra-Bhaga at an elevation of 2723 m asl in the south and end at 3600 m asl in the north. Agriculture is practiced up to 3400 m asl at Lindur village. The watershed has natural (forest and alpine pastures) and human dominated (agriculture, horticulture, agroforestry and forestry) systems, which represent most of the valley. Within the watershed, there is a great diversity of land use due to topography and population. Because, there is an expansion of built-up and settlement land by 35.4% in 2001 as compared to that of 1991 due to population growth within the watershed. During the last decade (1991~2001) the population increased by 87.3% in this watershed area ([20]). In general, the steep slopes of the region were for forest or grassland and the areas with gentle slopes were extensively cultivated.

Fig. 1 - Drainage system of the Jahlmanal watershed in the Lahaul valley.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Climate and vegetation zone

Climatically, the Lahaul valley is cold and arid with low rainfall, high snowfall and severe winters. Broadly, the valley has two seasons, short lived summers and prolonged severe winter. The nearest meteorological station for the Jahlmanal watershed is at Tandi, 12 km far from Jahlma at the confluence of the Chandra and Bhaga rivers at an altitude of 2846 m asl. On an average (1985 to 2000) monthly highest maximum temperature is 17.7° C in July and lowest is -3.5° C in January (Fig. 2). Lowest ever recorded minimum temperature is -28o C in January 1989. Average annual snowfall is 485 mm. The months of February and March received more than 50% of the snowfall. However, smaller snowfall is common from December to April. Rainfall is scarce although showers occasionally occur May to September. The annual average rainfall is 267 mm.

Fig. 2 - Precipitation and temperature conditions in cold desert of the Lahaul valley.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Agriculture and vegetation

Agricultural activities are performed during the short summer season (May to September). A few decades back, agricultural practices were mainly traditional with rich crop diversity (Fagopyrum spp., Hordeum himalayense, Saussurea costus, Inula recemosa), but recently people have turned towards introduced cash crops such as potatoes, peas and hops. These major cash crops have been a source of income under ensured irrigation through kuhls (water channels). In the watershed, the largest area of cultivated land was found to be concentrated between 2801 to 3000 m asl in the villages ([20]). This was due to availability of relatively gentle terrain favourable for cultivation combined with the accessibility of irrigation facilities in this altitudinal range. Cash crops are exported and food items, fuelwood and timber are imported from adjacent regions such as the Kullu valley.

Salix spp. and Populus spp. are important species in the agroforestry and forestry systems of the watershed. However, Hippophae rhamnoides was found in dense patches along the slopes in watershed area. J. macropoda was the dominated tree species in the forests system on the slopes of watershed, which remains usually dry. Scrublands (grassland with tussocks of wild rose) are the important land cover species upon which wildlife and domesticated animals survive ([25]).

Village systems

Six revenue villages, Jahlma (3000 m asl), Haling (2760 m asl), Phura (2880 m asl), Rapring (3040 m asl), Gorma (2960 m asl) and Lindur (3330 m asl) are located in the watershed. Settlements in the watershed ranged from 2760 m in Haling to 3330 m in Lindur villages, whereas other villages fall in between Haling and Lindur (Fig. 1). Revenue area under Gorma and Jahlma were nearly same, whereas the third largest village in the area was Phura. The other three remaining villages, such as Rapring, Lindur and Haling, were relatively small in area compared to Gorma and Jahlma. The number of households and people living therein were larger in Jahlma followed by Gorma. The total population increased from 839 in 1991 to 1571 in 2001 with an annual population growth rate of 8.72% ([20]).

Forest and scrubland

The area under the forest land and scrubland (grassland with patches of Rosa webbiana, Berberis pseudumbelata and Ribes grossularia) is vegetated beyond the highest altitude village Lindur; after that the area is totally barren with stony outcrops and snow bound areas which remain devoid of any shrubs. Here, land use practices cover more than 90% of the total area of the watershed (33 km2). Vegetation cover in the natural forest land was very sparse, and dominated by J. macropoda. This species is occasionally associated with Crataegus songarica and R. webbiana. From the imagery (Fig. 3a, Fig. 3b), it was observed that the extent of forest cover was reduced slightly during the period 1991-2001. Scrublands are also important land cover in the watershed supporting wild and domesticated grazing animals ([20]). The colour for these scrublands on the false colour composites (FCCs) was represented by light yellow or grey to dark brown. The decrease in the vegetation cover in the forest and scrubland was mainly due to the excessive extraction of forest products. However, there was no substantial change in forestland and scrubland during the study period, as these lands now were controlled directly by the Government. It is assumed in the Jahlmanal watershed that the extraction of forest resources would increase considerably in the future with population growth increases. This excessive exploitation will intensify the pressure on the existing scant forest cover causing environmental problems, such as forest resource depletion and land deterioration.

Fig. 3 - Satellite imagery of Jahlmanal watershed (source: [20]). (a) Taken on November 19, 1991 at 1647 hours (IST), SAT-ID: IRS-1A, Data-ID: 52D14; (b) taken on November 13, 2001 at 1126 hours (IST), SAT-ID: IRS-1D, Data-ID: 52D14.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

  Materials and Methods 

Survey and sampling

The study of vegetation analysis was carried out during the peak growing season using transects along altitudinal gradients and different marked features of topography. Three transects were laid down starting from a base of the slope to the end of the vegetation zone in each selected site. The transects were 200 m apart from each other. The quadrats (10x10 m2) were laid down for tree and shrubs in a line running method ([11]) along slopes with an interval of 10 m. Herbarium specimens were collected, dried in a plant press and identified by a professional taxonomist at the Institute. Diameter at breast height (DBH) of tree species was measured at 1.37 m from ground level. However, in the case of shrubs diameter was measured at 5 cm above ground level. Individuals of more than 5.0 cm diameter were considered as trees, individuals between 1.7 cm to 5.0 cm diameter were considered as saplings or shrubs (as the case may be - [12]).

Data analysis

Frequency, density and abundance were calculated following Curtis & McIntosh ([7]). The abundance: frequency (A/F) ratio was used to interpret distribution pattern of species. This ratio indicates the regular (<0.025), random (0.025-0.05) and contagious (>0.05) distribution pattern ([6]). Basal area, relative density, relative frequency and relative dominance were calculated following Phillips ([21]) and the sum of the relative density, relative frequency and relative dominance was treated as importance value indices (IVI) for various species ([5]). Species richness, dominance concentration (cd), evenness and similarity index were also analysed. The species richness is the number of species per unit area ([16], [42]). Agroforestry, forestry and forest system vegetation will be considered separately and presented separately. Species diversity (H´) was computed by the [30] information index as follows (eqn. 1):

\begin{equation} H^{\prime} = -\sum (N_{i}/N) \log_{2} (N_{i}/N) \end{equation}

where, Ni is the total density value for species i and N is the sum of the density values of all the species in that site.

Dominance concentration (cd) was determined by following Simpson’s formula ([31]) where Ni and N were the same as for the Shannon-Weiner information index as follows (eqn. 2):

\begin{equation} Cd = \sum (N_{i}/N)^{2} \end{equation}

Evenness index (J’) was determined according to Pielou ([22]).

The utilization patterns of various species were studied by semi-structured questionnaires; interviews held with the family head and experienced individuals. Data was analyzed statistically with SYSTAT, the data of three systems (agroforestry, forestry, forests). The analysis of variance (α = 0.01) and Fisher’s Least Significance Difference ([34]) were used to find out the difference in species richness, density and dominance concentration.


Vegetation analysis

The vegetation analysis was shown to have a contagious distribution pattern in the watershed. The farmers maintain tree species on the boundaries of terraced agriculture fields under low density. Salix fragilis, Hippophae rhamnoides, Populus nigra, Prunus cornuta, Prunus armeniaca, Prunus avium, Malus baccata and Crataegus songarica were important agroforestry plant species in the watershed. Other trees and shrubs were also found under agroforestry and forestry systems. Plantations of multipurpose tree species were established around the village settlements to protect the villages from snow slides and to meet fodder and fuelwood requirements.

Agroforestry system

In the agroforestry system of Jahlmanal watershed, 20 species were found (6 tree species, 7 small trees and 7 shrubs), which provide fodder, fuelwood and other requirements to the farmers (Tab. 1). S. fragilis (3340 trees ha-1) had the highest tree density, followed by Juniperus macropoda (700 trees ha-1), P. nigra (590 trees ha-1), Robinia pseudoacacia (180 trees ha-1), P. cornuta (130 trees ha-1) and Juglans regia (40 trees ha-1). Similarly, the importance value index (IVI) was highest for S. fragilis (100.8) followed by P. nigra (20.4), J. macropoda (16.7), R. pseudoacacia (2.8), P. cornuta (2.6) and Juglans regia (2.0). Basal area was also recorded highest for S. fragilis (961.8 cm2/100m2), P. nigra (142.8 cm2/100 m2) and R. pseudoacacia (9.1 cm2/100 m2), respectively.

Tab. 1 - Density, basal area, important value indices, abundance frequency ration, nature and utilization pattern of different plant species occurred in agroforestry system in the Jahlmanal watershed, the Lahaul valley. (P) = planted species, (N) = naturally regenerating species, (a) = Important value indices, (b)= abundance/frequency.

Groups Species Local name Density ha-1 Basal Area
(cm2/100 m2)
IVIa A/Fb Nature Uses
Trees Salix fragilis L. Beli 3340 961.8 100.8 0.1 P Fuel, fodder, small timber, chewing twig
Populus nigra L. Safeda 590 142.8 20.4 0.1 P Fuel, Timber
Robinia pseudoacacia L. Kikar 180 9.1 2.8 1.4 P Fuel, fodder
Juniperus macropoda Boiss. Shur 700 66.1 16.7 0.1 N Incense(Dhoop), Fuel
Prunus cornuta (Wall. ex Royle) Steudel Kurun 130 11.2 2.6 1.0 N Fuel, fodder, fruit
Juglans regia L. Akhrot 40 14.6 2.0 0.5 P Fruit
Total - 4980 1205.4 145.3 3.1 - -
Small-trees Malus baccata (L.) Borkh. Leejho 70 13.9 2.8 0.4 N Fuel, fruit
Pyrus malus L. Seb 750 68.6 15.0 0.2 P Fruit
Prunus communis Huds. Plum 130 26.5 4.2 0.4 P Fruit
Prunus armeniaca L. Khumani 40 8.7 1.4 1.1 P Fruit
Prunus avium L. Chery 30 0.5 0.8 0.8 P Fruit
Crataegus songarica G. Koch Pingyat 50 4.8 0.9 5.6 N Fuel, Fodder
Salix acmophylla Boiss. Jangli beli 840 97.9 16.4 0.3 N Fuel, fodder, baskets
Total - 1910 220.9 41.4 8.8 - -
Shrubs Hippophae rhamnoides L. ssp. turkestanica Rousi Sarla,
5110 201.6 58.2 0.2 N Fuel, ketchup, pickle
Rosa webbiana Wall ex. Royle Shyabala 3950 5.3 44.4 0.1 N Fuel, fencing
Berberis pseudumbelata Parker Kirmali 180 0.4 2.3 1.4 N Fuel, fencing, medicine
Lonicera quinquelocularis Hardwp. Kharmu 310 1.5 4.3 0.6 N Fuel, fodder
Lonicera hypoleuca Decne Kharmu 140 1.2 1.2 16.7 N Fuel, fodder
Ribes grossularia L. Pilickcha 230 0.4 2.3 3.1 N Fuel, fencing
Cotoneaster microphylla Wall. ex Lindl. Roktali 50 0.2 0.6 5.6 N Fuel, fodder
Total - 9970 210.6 113.3 27.6 - -
Grand total - - 16860 1636.9 300.0 39.6 - -

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Among the small trees, the highest density and basal area were for Pyrus malus (750 trees ha-1; 68.6 cm2/100 m2) followed by Prunus communis (130 trees ha-1; 26.5 cm2/100 m2). Other species such as M. baccata, C. songarica, P. armeniaca and P. avium had very poor distribution in terms of density and basal area. Among the shrubs, the highest density, IVI, and basal area were recorded for H. rhamnoides (5110 bushes ha-1; 58.2; 201.6 cm2/100 m2) followed by Rosa webbiana (3950 bushes ha-1; 44.4; 5.3 cm2/100 m2). H. rhamnoides was widely distributed along the margins of agricultural fields and in patches along the grasslands and streams.

In the watershed, 30% trees, 35% small trees and 35% shrubs species comprised the agroforestry system. Shrubs contributed highest density (59.1% of the total) followed by trees (29.5%) and small trees (11.3%). The trees had highest basal area (73.6% of the total); there was not much difference between basal area of small trees and bushes. The IVI values were highest for trees (48.5% of total) in the agroforestry system followed by bushes and small trees (13.8%).


In the forestry systems a total of 15 species were found around settlements. Of these, 5 were tree species, 6 small trees and 4 shrub species (Tab. 2). S. fragilis was the most dominant species and recorded the highest density (5520 trees ha-1) followed by P. nigra (350 trees ha-1) and J. macropoda (160 trees ha-1). The highest IVI values was recorded for S. fragilis (186.3) followed by P. nigra (20.1), J. macropoda (6.0), P. cornuta (1.9) and R. pseudoacacia (1.1). Basal area, more or less, has also shown the similar trend.

Tab. 2 - Density, basal area, important value indices, abundance frequency ratio and nature of different plant species occurred in forestry in the Jahlmanal watershed, the Lahaul valley. (P) = planted species, (N) = naturally regenerating species.

Group Species Local name Density
Basal Area
(cm2/100 m2)
IVI A/F Nature
Trees Salix fragilis L. Beli 5520 1588.4 186.3 0.1 P
Populus nigra L. Safeda 350 85.3 20.1 0.1 P
Robinia pseudoacacia L. Kikar 40 2.0 1.1 4.0 P
Juniperus macropoda Boiss. Shur 160 15.0 6.0 0.4 N
Prunus cornuta (Wall. ex Royle) Steudel Kurun 50 4.4 1.9 1.3 N
Total - 6120 1695.2 215.4 5.9 N
Small-trees Malus baccata (L.) Borkh. Leejho 80 15.4 4.0 0.5 N
Pyrus malus L. Seb 20 1.8 0.9 2.0 P
Prunus communis Huds. Plum 60 12.6 2.5 1.5 P
Prunus armeniaca L. Khumani 20 4.8 1.1 2.0 P
Crataegus songarica G. Koch Pingyat 10 1.1 0.8 1.0 N
Salix acmophylla Boiss. Jangli beli 10 1.2 0.8 1.0 N
Total - 200 36.9 10.0 8.0 N
Shrubs Hippophae rhamnoides L. ssp. turkestanica Rousi Sarla, Chharma 1660 65.5 31.0 0.5 N
Rosa webbiana Wall ex. Royle Shyabala 1590 2.1 36.2 0.1 N
Berberis pseudumbelata Parker Kirmali 150 0.4 2.7 3.8 N
Ribes grossularia L. Pilickcha 230 0.4 4.7 1.4 N
Total - 3630 68.4 74.6 5.8 N
Grand total - - 9950 1800.6 300.0 19.7 -

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Among the small trees, highest density was noticed for M. baccata (80 trees ha-1) and the lowest for C. songarica and Salix acmophylla. However, M. baccata had the highest IVI and basal area (4.0; 15.4 cm2/100 m2) followed by P. communis (2.5; 12.6 cm2/100 m2). Among the shrubs, H. rhamnoides and R. webbiana were most important species in terms of density, IVI and basal area. In forestry, trees were prominent in terms of density, basal area and IVI occupying 61.5% of total density, 94.2% of total basal area and 71.8% of total IVI, respectively.


In the forest, a total 6 plant species were recorded, dominated by stunted J. macropoda trees, the others being bushes (Tab. 3). The bushes R. webbiana, Berberis peudumbelata, Cotoneaster microphylla, Ribes grossularia and Juniperus communis were sparsely distributed. J. macropoda had highest density (4200 trees ha-1), IVI (205.9) and basal area (394.6 cm2/100 m2). Among the shrubs, R. webbiana was the most important species in terms of density, IVI and basal area. Other species were found poor in terms of distribution. J. macropoda occupied 60.3% density of entire forest, 98.7% basal area and 68.6% IVI, whereas density, basal area and IVI for shrubs were 39.7%, 1.3% and 31.4%, respectively.

Tab. 3 - Density, basal area, important value indices and abundance frequency ratio of different plant species occurred in the forest of Jahlmanal watershed, the Lahaul valley.

Group Species Local name Density ha-1 Basal Area
(cm2/100 m2)
Trees Juniperus macropoda Boiss. Shur 4200 394.6 205.9 0.2
Total - 4200 394.6 205.9 0.2
Shrubs Rosa webbiana Wall
ex. Royle
Shyabala 2080 2.8 73.7 0.1
Berberis pseudumbelata Parker Kirmali 210 0.5 5.7 2.7
Ribes grossularia L. Shyabala 30 0.1 1.7 1.4
Cotoneaster microphylla Wall. ex Lindl. Roktali 240 1.1 7.5 1.3
Juniperus communis L. Path 200 0.6 5.5 2.5
Total - 2760 5.0 94.1 8.0
Grand total - - 6960 399.6 300.0 8.2

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Vegetation characteristics

Species richness was higher under agroforestry system followed by forestry and forest (Tab. 4, Tab. 5). The major species under agroforestry and forestry were S. fragilis, P. nigra and H. rhamnoides, whereas J. macropoda was in forests. The dominance concentration was recorded lowest for agroforestry system (0.2) and highest for forest (0.5). Diversity index was highest for agroforestry system (2.0) and lowest for J. macropoda forest (1.0). Evenness was higher under agroforestry system followed by forest and forestry. The species richness among the three systems were significantly different (F = 95.45; P < 0.01). The species richness was found declining with increase in elevation. The density (F = 60.20; P < 0.01) and dominance concentration (cd - F = 39.99; P < 0.01) among the three systems was found significantly different.

Tab. 4 - Characteristics of different vegetation types in the Jahlmanal watershed, the Lahaul valley.

Attributes Agroforestry Forestry Forest
Species richness 20.0 15.0 6.0
Dominance Concentration (CD) 0.2 0.4 0.5
Diversity Index (H‾) 2.0 1.4 1.0
Evenness Index (J’) 0.7 0.5 0.6

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Tab. 5 - Comparative species richness, density, basal area and important value indices in the Jahlmanal watershed, the Lahaul valley.

Sector Groups No. of
Density Basal area IVI
Agroforestry Tree 6 4980 1205.4 145.3
Small-tree 7 1910 220.9 41.4
Shrub 7 9940 210.6 113.3
Total 20 16860 1636.9 300.0
Forestry Tree 5 6120 1695.2 215.4
Small-tree 6 200 36.9 10.0
Shrub 4 3630 64.4 74.6
Total 20 9950 1800.6 300.0
Forest Tree 1 4200 394.6 205.9
Shrub 5 2760 5.0 94.1
Total 6 6960 399.6 300.0

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer


Vegetation analysis

In the Jahlmanal watershed, the farmers have maintained tree species on edges and boundaries of terraced agricultural fields under low density. The agroforestry system has been developed to meet some parts of fodder, fuelwood and minor timber requirements ([25]). S. fragilis and P. nigra are the two most successful tree species in the cold desert environment, hence they are maintained under this agroforestry system. Vishvakarma et al. ([37]) in their study of indigenous agroforestry system in the Kullu valley found that the farmers maintained Grewia oppositifolia in high density to meet fodder, fuelwood and fibre requirements in temperate climatic conditions. Similarly, S. fragilis is the most successful tree species in the Lahaul valley found below 3000 m altitude; above this altitude high tree mortality (55.2%) was found particularly in Khoksar area ([25]). Growing trees along the edges in the agricultural field is an age-old practice in the Indian Himalaya. There are a variety of multipurpose tree species grown and managed for subsistence requirement of local communities ([17], [37]) such as fuelwood, timber, fruits and raw materials. The most important aspect of the agroforestry and forestry systems is lessening the anthropogenic pressure on natural forests ([23], [19], [37]). In the forest system only well adapted species such as J. macropoda and R. webbiana can survive under extremely xeric soil conditions of south facing slopes. J. macropoda is one of the most successful tree species on the south facing dry and xeric slopes ([4]). The species richness in agroforestry systems in the watershed was relatively higher than in forest. This is because the farmers maintained these plants in agroforestry, hence these plants fulfill the fodder and fuelwood requirements of the farmers.

Among the small trees, Pyrus malus (apple) is being introduced as a new cash crop. S. acmophylla (a wild willow) natural grown under agroforestry system was maintained as a basic source of energy and raw material for making baskets. Therefore, these two species are found under agroforestry system with relatively higher density. Among the shrubs, H. rhamnoides was found relatively higher density and distributed along the margins of agricultural fields, grasslands and along the streams in the watershed. It has a nitrogen fixing ability through microbial association helps in land restoration ([28]). However, R. webbiana, forms tussocks in degraded forests and grasslands. It was widely distributed in the watershed except on stony outcrops and snowbound areas. Tussocks of R. webbiana hold soil, check soil erosion and survive under extreme climatic conditions of the cold desert. H. rhamnoides was used as fuelwood, making agricultural implements, and the fruits are used for juice and ketchup. R. webbiana used as a fencing material and fuelwood. Regular irrigation through kuhl promotes natural regeneration of local species under agroforestry and forestry systems.

The plantations of S. fragilis and P. nigra provides a major share of fuelwood requirement for domestic use and a large portion of green fodder during winter months. Small trees like P. malus, P. communis and P. armeniaca are planted in a low density for their edible fruits of domestic use. All the shrub species under plantations grow naturally and are used as fuelwood, fodder and fencing materials. The relict patches J. macropoda in the watershed are highly degraded as a result of intensive wood, leaves removal and grazing animals. J. macropoda tolerates the extremely xeric soils of the cold desert. In the past, Pinus wallichiana was also found among the J. macropoda trees ([9]). In the lower part of the Pattan valley in the Lahaul valley, P. wallichiana is still found with very low density. Excessive removals of the trees in the past have been a major cause of its elimination from the system. J. macropoda has been a major timber species in the watershed since the past but nowadays it is almost distributed in the relict patches. Ecologically, it is an important evergreen plant species in the region. So this species socio-culturally has become a part and parcel of a social system of the local communities.

Vegetation characteristics

In the agroforestry and forestry systems, several indigenous plant species have regenerated under natural conditions, besides the plantation of S. fragilis, P. nigra, P. malus, P. communis and P. armeniaca, whereas in forest only drought resistant species are survived. This was evident in reflecting species richness, evenness and diversity index of the agroforestry and forestry as compared to forest. Species richness was highest at intermediate level of pH in Norderney (North Sea Germany) and Baltic coast of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in the north-eastern Germany from Rostock eastward ([10]. This study supported the present study. Saxena & Singh ([29]) recorded high species richness (4 to 22) and diversity (0.74 to 3.10) for the shrub layer in the Kumaun Himalaya, which is comparable to the present study. The values of dominance concentration (cd) were similar to those reported by Whittaker ([41]) and Risser & Rice ([27]) for temperate vegetation (0.01 to 0.99). Saxena & Singh ([29]), and Tiwari & Singh ([36]) reported the values of 0.11 to 1.00 for different forests in the Kumaun Himalaya. Species diversity was under agroforestry and forest systems are comparable with values generally reported for temperate forests ([18], [33]). The species diversity was found lower than reported by Risser & Rice ([27]) which ranged from 2.00 to 3.00 for temperate forest. The vegetation of the watershed was shown a sparse distribution pattern due to xeric climatic conditions. There were considerable differences in the species composition of vegetation in the watershed.


The available relict forest patches in the Jahlmanal watershed are degrading fast due to high anthropogenic pressures, hence in-situ and ex-situ conservation measures are urgently required. These patches are subjected to deforestation and fragmentation in many ways due to extraction of timber, fuelwood, fodder, leaves and medicinal plants, etc. A systematic and scientific research is required for mass multiplication and revival of Juniperus forests in the watershed. Efforts are urgently required for plantation of grasses, bushes (Seabuckthorn) and multipurpose tree species (Salix spp. and Populus spp.) with indigenous species, ecologically suitable for the xeric cold desert environment. Technological interventions are also required to improve the quality and resistance against drought and climate change. The plants need to be distributed among the local people to plant these species in their own private land for woods and leaves based requirements. Seed orchards and arboretum establishment is also suggested for mass multiplication of the existing valuable plant taxa. The utilization pattern of a particular plant species also provides valuable information on the status, their use pattern and dependency of the local communities on plant species.


We thankful to the Dr. L.M.S. Palni, Director, G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora, Uttarakhand, for providing necessary facilities. Financial support to conduct the present study by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India is highly acknowledged with thanks. The first author is also thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi for awarding Senior Research Fellowship. The anonymous reviewers are acknowledged with thanks for their helpful comments to improve the manuscript.


Anonymous (1993). Action plan on cold desert: an integrated approach for sustainable development. Regional center, NAEB, UHF, Solan, pp. 1-40.
Anonymous (1995). Annual report. G.B. Plant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora (India), pp. 55-56.
Aswal BS, Goel AK (1989). Alpine flora in west Himalayan mountain of India: a curious view. Himalayan Research and Development 8: 10-13.
Aswal BS, Mehrotra BN (1994). Flora of Lahual-Spiti. A cold desert in north west Himalaya. Bishen Singh, Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India, pp. 10-15.
Curtis JT (1959). The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Winconsin, USA.
Curtis JT, Cottom G (1956). Plant ecology workbook. Laboratory field production in <i>Andropogon gerardi</i>. Ecology 31: 488-489.
Curtis JT, McIntosh RR (1950). The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 46: 84-89.
Dhar U, Vir J, Kachroo P (1994). Ladhak: an update on natural resources. In: “High altitudes of the Himalaya - Biogeography, ecology and conservation” (Pangety YPS, Rawal RS eds). pp. 102-114.
Harcourt AFP (1870). The Himalayan district of Koloo, Lahaul and Spiti. Vivek Publishing House (reprint 1972), Delhi, India, pp. 74.
Issermann M (2005). Soil pH and species diversity in coastal dunes. Plant Ecology 178:111-120.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Kershaw KK (1973). Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology. ELBS and Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd. London, pp. 308.
Knight DH (1963). A distance method for constructing forest profile diagram and obtaining structural data. Tropical Ecology 4: 89-94.
Kuniyal CP, Rawat YS, Oinam SS, Kuniyal JC, Vishvakarma SCR (2005). Kuth (<i>Saussurea lappa</i>) cultivation in the cold desert environment of the Lahaul valley, northwestern Himalaya, India: arising threats and need to revive socio-economic. Biodiversity and Conservation 14 (5): 1035-1045.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Kuniyal CP, Vishvakarma SCR, Kuniyal JC, Singh GS (2002). Seabuckthorn (<i>Hippophae L</i>). A promising plant for land-restoration in the cold desert Himalayas. In: “Proceedings of International Workshop on Seabuckthorn” (Singh V, Khosla PK eds). Feb. 18-21 2002, New Delhi, India, pp. 1-6.
Kuniyal JC, Vishvakarma SCR, Singh GS (2004). Changing crop biodiversity and resource use efficiency of traditional versus introduced crops in cold desert of north-western Indian Himalaya: a case of Lahaul valley. Biodiversity and Conservation 13 (7): 1271-1304.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Mac Arthur RH (1965). Pattern of species diversity. Biological Review 40: 510-533.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Maikhuri RK, Semwal RL, Rao KS, Singh K, Saxena KG (2000). Growth and ecological impacts of traditional agroforestry tree species in central Himalaya, India. Agroforestry Systems 48: 257-272.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Monk CD (1967). Tree species diversity in the eastern deciduous forest with particular references to north central Florida. American Naturalist 10: 173-187.
Nautiyal AR, Negi GCS (1994). Multipurpose tree species with potential for introduction in agroforestry system in Himalayan mountains. In: “Agroforestry system for degraded lands” (Singh P, Pathak PS, Roze MM eds). Oxford & IBH publishing co-pvt-Ltd, New Delhi, India, pp. 269-278.
Oinam SS, Rawat YS, Khoiyangbam RS, Khwairakpam G, Kuniyal JC, Vishvakarma SCR (2005). Land use and land cover changes in Jahlma watershed of the Lahaul valley, India. Journal of Mountain Science 2 (2): 129-136.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Phillips EA (1959). Methods of vegetation study. Henry Holt and Co. Inc., New York, USA.
Pielou EC (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal Theoretical Biology 13: 131-144.
Rao KS, Maikhuri RK (1996). Agroforestry for sustainable development of rural people ecosystem of central Himalaya. Proceedings of the “IUFRO-DNAES international meeting on resource inventory techniques to support agroforestry and environment activities” (Kohali RK, Arya KS eds). Dyanand National Academy of Environmental Science, DAV. Collage. Chandigarh (India) Oct 1-3 1996, pp. 301-305.
Rawat YS, Oinam SS, Vishvakarma SCR, Kuniyal JC (2004). <i>Saussurea costus</i> (Falc.) Lipsch: a promising medicinal crop under cold desert agro-ecosystem in north-western Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry 27 (3): 297-303.
Rawat YS, Oinam SS, Vishvakarma SCR, Kuniyal CP, Kuniyal JC (2006). Willow (<i>Salix fragilis</i> Linn.): a multipurpose tree species under pest attack in the cold desert of Lahaul valley, north-western Himalaya, India. Ambio 35 (1): 43-48.
Rawat YS (2006). Vegetational analysis, socio-economic and cultural aspects of <i>Salix</i> sp. in cold desert environment of the Lahaul valley, north-western Himalaya (HP). Ph.D. Thesis, Garhwal University, Srinagar Garhwal, UK-India, pp. xiii+270.
Risser PG, Rice EL (1971). Diversity in tree species in Oklahoma upland forest species. Ecology 52: 876-880.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Rongsen L (1992). Seabuckthorn: a multipurpose plant species for fragile mountains. International centre for integrated mountain development (ICIMOD), Occasional Paper No. 20, Kathmandu, Nepal, pp.1-62.
Saxena AK, Singh JS (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetatio 50: 3-32.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Shannon CE, Weiner W (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. University Illinois Press, Urbana, USA, pp.17.
Simpson EH (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 668.
Singh GS, Ram SC, Kuniyal JC (1997). Changing traditional land use patterns in the Great Himalayas: a case study of Lahaul Valley. Journal of Environmental Systems 25 (2): 195-211.
Singh JS, Singh SP (1987). Forest vegetation of the Himalaya. Botanical Review 52: 82-192.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1968). Statistical methods. Oxford and IBH publishing Co., New Delhi, India.
Sood SK, Nath R, Kalia DC (2001). Ethnobotany of cold desert tribes of Lahaul-Spiti (NW, Himalaya). Deep Publication, New Delhi, India, pp. 228.
Tiwari JC, Singh SP (1985). Analysis of woody vegetation in a mixed Oak forest of Kumaon Himalaya. Proc. Indian Sci. Acad. 332-345.
Vishvakarma SCR, Kuniyal JC, Singh GS (1998). Indigenous agroforestry system of north western Himalaya. Research for mountain development: some initiative and accomplishment. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, Uttarakhand, India, pp. 99-118.
Vishvakarma SCR, Rawat YS, Oinam SS, Kuniyal JC (2005a). Irrigation (Kuhls): a community management system in cold desert of the Lahaul valley, northwestern Himalaya, India. In: Proceedings of the “Third international seminar on farmer managed irrigation systems and governance alternatives” (Pradhan P, Gautam U eds). Kathmandu (Nepal), Sep 9-10 2004, pp. 425-444.
Vishvakarma, SCR, Kuniyal JC, Rawat YS, Oinam SS (2005b). Impact of anthropogenic activities on Bio-resource in cold desert of Lahaul valley, north-western Himalaya. Submitted to the Ministry of Environment & Forests, New Delhi, India. F. No. 10/35/99-CS/BR of 10<sup>th</sup> April 2000, pp. 190.
Watt G (1981). Notes on vegetation of Chamba state and British Lahul. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 18: 368-382.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Whittaker RH (1965). Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147: 250-260.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Whittaker RH (1975). Communities and ecosystem (2<sup>nd</sup> edn). Macmillan publishing Co. New York, pp. 385.

Authors’ Affiliation

YS Rawat
SCR Vishvakarma
G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora 263 643 Uttarakhand (India)
SS Oinam
JC Kuniyal
G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Himachal Unit, Mohal-Kullu 175 126 Himachal Pradesh (India)

Corresponding author



Rawat YS, Vishvakarma SCR, Oinam SS, Kuniyal JC (2010). Diversity, distribution and vegetation assessment in the Jahlmanal watershed in cold desert of the Lahaul valley, north-western Himalaya, India. iForest 3: 65-71. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0532-003

Paper history

Received: Dec 24, 2009
Accepted: Apr 21, 2010

First online: May 17, 2010
Publication Date: May 17, 2010
Publication Time: 0.87 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2010

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 35600
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 28882
Abstract Page Views: 1450
PDF Downloads: 4479
Citation/Reference Downloads: 19
XML Downloads: 770

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 5122
Overall contacts: 35600
Avg. contacts per week: 48.65

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Nov 2020)

Total number of cites (since 2010): 3
Average cites per year: 0.27


Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.


iForest Similar Articles


This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info