Close Home
Journal of Biogeosciences and Forestry published by SISEF
ISSN: 1971-7458
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
vol. 2, pp. 77-84 (Jun 2009)
Copyright © by the Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology
doi: 10.3832/ifor0498-002

Research Article

Establishment of a planted field with Mediterranean shrubs in Sardinia and its evaluation for climate mitigation and to combat desertification in semi-arid regions

De Dato G.D., Loperfido L., De Angelis P.Corresponding author, Valentini R.

Introduction 

Forested areas are important in arid and semi-arid regions primarily to combat desertification, but also to increase carbon sinks ([37]). The Mediterranean basin is particularly vulnerable to the desertification, as consequence of a mixed of environmental factors and human pressures. In the first category we can cite the occurrence of prolonged drought spells, the presence of highly erodible soils, the high flammability of the species; in the latter, the most relevant phenomena are land abandonment and urbanization of the coastal areas ([71], [40], [3], [17]). According to several studies ([18], see also ⇒ DIS/­MED web site), Sardinia is an island with high risk of desertification. To reverse the land degradation processes, restoration in the Mediterranean Basin had been frequently obtained by planting indigenous and exotic conifers ([57]), because of their rapid growth and aridity resistance. In Sardinia, in particular, this type of reforestation covered more than 40.000 ha in the 70’s ([5]). On one hand, these interventions provided job for local people, but on the other hand, they substantially altered the original landscape and made erosion processes start ([5]). Maestre & Cortina ([43]) wrote a comprehensive review of the ecological effects of Pinus halepensis plantations in the Mediterranean Basin. According to these authors, supported by several other studies ([42], [4], [7], [44]) classic reforestation by Pinus did not effectively facilitate the establishment of late-successional shrubs under tree canopy. Furthermore, a forest cannot be representative of later stages of succession under semi-arid conditions, because of the scarcity of water resources ([7]).

On the contrary, it has been demonstrated that shrubs are nurse species for tree seedlings, especially in the Mediterranean region ([11], [47], [13], [51]). Therefore, shrubs can protect and improve water and light regime, allowing the germination of seeds and the establishment of late-successional species. Planting shrubs improves physical and chemical soil properties, creating a favourable environment for soil microbes ([25], [54], [27]). Furthermore, the recovery of soil characteristics is the first step leading to reduction of desertification processes ([35], [37]) and increasing soil cover by plantation is a successful way to preserve soil ([54], [67]).

In the present study, we planted three species (J. phoenicea, R. officinalis, and P. lentiscus) selected among the pioneer species colonizing soil after disturbances in this area ([6]). Several studies reported that planting indigenous shrubs is more efficient than allochthonous in restoring degraded soils ([50], [8], [64], [31]). In Mediterranean areas, planting indigenous species adapted to limited nutrient and water resources is essential to obtain high survival rates. But at the same time, plenty of literature ([21], [22], [55], [26], [66], [8], [9], [10], [16], [67], [30], [65]) indicates seedling quality, weeding, irrigation, amendants, mychorrizal inoculation, and the right timing of planting as other important factors.

The aims of this work were: 1) to illustrate an experimental area in Sardinia used as a test-site to build up afforestation and reforestation activities in arid and semi-arid areas with autochthonous shrub species, using the minimum amount of external energy input (minimum tillage, no irrigation, etc.); 2) to show the results one year after plantation trying to explain the role of different densities and specific compositions; 3) to hypothesize some trends of C accumulation of this “artificial” Mediterranean semi-arid shrubland by comparison with data found in the literature.

Materials and Methods 

Experimental site and plant material

The experimental area is located in the peninsula of Capo Caccia (north-western Sardinia), within the Natural Reserve Porto Conte - Capo Caccia (40° 37’ N, 8° 10’ E). The geologic substrate is Mesozoic limestone. The main natural soil type is Terra Rossa (Lithic Xerorthent and Typic Rhodoxeralfs - [69], [70], [61]), rocky and shallow (20-30 cm), with a sandy loam texture, an ABC profile, and neutral pH. The experimental area (about 5 ha) was established in abandoned arable soil, which has been used in the past for wheat production.

The climate is semi-arid: the average rainfall amount is 640 mm yr-1; precipitation falls in autumn and spring with a long dry period from May to August, with about 60 mm. The mean annual temperature is 16.8 °C. The mean of minimum temperatures in the coldest month is 7 °C, the mean of the maximum temperatures in the hottest month is 28 °C (meteorological station of Fertilia Airport 40°38’ N 8°17’ E; altitude 40 m asl; sea distance 4273 m; period of observation 1961-1990).

In the Natural Reserve, four different vegetation types can be recognized: olm-oak forest, saved from the overexploitation of the XVI century ([6]); an afforested area, set up in the ’70s, with Pinus halepensis Mill., P. pinea L., Cupressus sempervirens L., Eucalyptus spp.; shrublands, which are widespread all over the area, particularly along the firebreak strips, the slopes and under Pinus plantations ([6]); Cistus shrublands, recolonizing abandoned land and burned areas. Cultivated surfaces are now abandoned.

Planting was performed in February 2006. Autochthonous shrubs species were planted, all grown in local nurseries managed by the Regional Forest Service of the Autonomous Region of Sardinia. The species were Juniperus phoenicea L. (JP), Pistacia lentiscus L. (PL), and Rosmarinus officinalis L. (RO). Plants derived from seed and were 2-3 years old. Juniperus seedlings were transplanted from 30 cm long phytocells; Rosmarinus and Pistacia seedlings were transplanted from squared pots (10 x 10 x 10 cm). Nine plots (36 x 18 m, 10 m spaced), were located according to a randomized block design with 4 replicates (36 plots). In each block (Fig. 1) three different species compositions were planted at three different densities: 2000 plant ha-1 (D1 - spaced 2 x 2.5 m), 2500 plant ha-1 (D2 - spaced 2 x 2 m), 3333 plant ha-1 (D3 - 2 x 1.5 m). The plot specific compositions were: monospecific with JP; monospecific with PL; plurispecific plots with JP, PL and RO (MIX). Before planting, soil was superficially ploughed at 35 cm depth. All the area was fenced to avoid grazing.

Fig. 1 - An example of a block. The drawing is not scaled.

Plant survival and plant biomass estimation

Plant status (alive or dead) was measured one, five and eight months after plantation, i.e., March, July and October 2006. Plants were recorded as dead when no live aboveground parts were found or when no plant were visible.

In February-March 2006, 16 plants in the monospecific plots and 12-13 per each species in the plurispecific ones were measured for biomass estimation.

Above- and below-ground biomass estimation was based on site species-specific allometric equations, based on the following model (eqn. 1):

(1)
biomass = f (dimensional parameter)

These equations were calculated on 32 plants of Juniperus phoenicea and 10 plants of Rosmarinus officinalis, randomly selected among plantation seedlings.

For each seedling, basal diameter (Db), height (H) and the two orthogonal maximum crown diameters (Dc1 e Dc2) were measured. The plants were separated in stem, branches, leaves and roots, then dried at 70 °C until constant weight. The root/shoot ratio (R/S) was then calculated.

J. phoenicea aboveground and belowground biomasses were related to the basal diameter (Tab. 1). R. officinalis aboveground biomass was related to height (Tab. 1), while no relationship was found for the belowground biomass. For this reason, its belowground biomass in the field was estimated applying a fixed R/S (0.68), as found for the plants used in laboratory for the calculation of allometric regression. For Pistacia lentiscus, the allometric relation for the aboveground biomass was taken from a previous study in the same area ([19]). Belowground biomass of P. lentiscus was calculated applying the R/S (0.5) reported by Maestre et al. ([42]) for potted plants.

Tab. 1 - Coefficients (± SE) of the allometric regressions applied for biomass estimation. AG: above-ground biomass; BG: below-ground biomass; Db: basal diameter; H: maximum height; Va: apparent volume (= orthogonal maximum crown diameters x maximum height).

Soil carbon and nitrogen

To estimate the initial values of soil total organic carbon (TOC) and nitrogen (TN), 144 soil cores (4 samples per plot) at two depths (0-20 cm and 20-40 cm) were collected just before the plantation. The samples were dried at air temperature and sieved at 2 mm. Sub-samples of each core were then dried at 105 °C and analysed by an Elemental Analyser (Flash EA 112 - Thermo Electron, Italy), after the reaction with HCl to remove the inorganic carbon (Method ISO 10694).

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences (p<0.05) of plant survival rates among the different specific compositions and densities were detected by ANOVA, with Bonferroni post-hoc test when the factor was significant. ANOVA was also run to test plant survival rates among species and densities inside the MIX plots. Prior to analysis, survival data were transformed by taking the arcsin of the square root of percentage survival.

Statistical differences (p<0.05) of plant biomass among the different specific compositions and densities were analysed by ANOVA, with Bonferroni post-hoc test when the factor was significant. ANOVA was also run to test biomass differences among species and densities inside the MIX plots.

ANOVA was used to highlight statistical differences (p<0.05) in soil total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) content at the different depths (0-20 cm and 20-40 cm) and treatments (specific composition and density).

All analyses were performed by SYSTAT 11 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois).

Results 

Living plants

Taking root results are summarized in Fig. 2 and Tab. 2. In March, almost all plants were still alive (99% on average), with no differences among the densities and the specific compositions. In July, the average survival percentage was 93%. No difference was found among densities and specific compositions at this sampling date. In October, the living plants were on average 34%. Alive plants significantly (p<0.001) decreased from July to October, while no difference was observed between March and July. The decrease in living plants between July and October was affected by the specific composition (p<0.001): the highest mortality was observed in PL plots (from 95% of living plants to 11%), while in JP and MIX plots survival decreased from 92% to 45%. This reduction affected the average annual survival: PL was significantly poorer in plants (69%, p<0.001) than JP and MIX (79% and 78%, respectively). On average, D3 plots showed a slight tendency (p=0.1) to have more living plants (79% compared to 74% in the D1 and 73% in D2 plots), but differences among the three densities were not significant. The three specific compositions did not have different survival rates at the different densities. Only at one occasion (October) there were more alive plants in the JP planted at D3 (p<0.01) than in the PL plots at the same density.

Fig. 2 - Living plant percentage in the plots according to densities and specific composition. Error bars indicate SE of the mean (n=4). For details about the statistical differences among the treatments, see Tab. 2.
Tab. 2 - Results of the ANOVA run for alive plants in the JP, PL and MIX plots.

In the MIX plots (Fig. 3, Tab. 3), Pistacia had on average lower (p<0.001) survival rates than Juniperus and Rosmarinus. In March, all plants belonging to all species and densities were recorded as alive. In July, percentage of living plants was on average 94%, without any difference among species and densities. In October, the average survival rate was 41%, but significant lower rates (p<0.001) were recorded for Pistacia plants (21%, compared to 55% and 48% respectively for Juniperus and Rosmarinus), independently on the density. Survival rate changed over time (p<0.001), with lower average values in October, independently on species and density.

Fig. 3 - Living plants (%) in the MIX plots at different densities and sampling time. Error bars indicate SE of the mean (n=4). Black column = J. phoenicea; grey column = P. lentiscus; white column = R. officinalis. For details about the statistical differences among the treatments, see Tab. 3.
Tab. 3 - Results of the ANOVA run for alive plants in the MIX plots for the three different species.

Plant biomass

Total biomass in March 2006 ranged between 0.7 and 5.0 g m-2 with an average value of 2.3 g m-2 (Tab. 4). Aboveground (AG) biomass was on average 1.5 g m-2, ranging between 0.4 and 3.4 g m-2. On average, PL plots had less AG biomass (0.8 g m-2; p<0.01, after post-hoc test) than JP plots (2.3 g m-2), independently on density, but not than the MIX plots (1.7 g m-2). MIX and JP AG biomasses were not different between each other. On average, D3 plots had a tendency (p=0.061, after post-hoc test) to have more AG biomass (2.3 g m-2) than the other two densities (1.4 and 1.1 g m-2, respectively).

Tab. 4 - Estimated above-ground (AB) and below-ground biomass (BG) ± SE in March 2006 (A) and October 2006 (B).

Mean belowground (BG) biomass in March was 0.8 g m-2, varying between 0.2 g m-2 and 1.6 g m-2. Mean BG biomass in PL plots was lower (p<0.01; 0.4 g m-2) than in JP (1.1 g m-2) and MIX (0.9 g m-2) plots. On average, in D3 plots there was a higher (p<0.05) amount of BG biomass compared to both the other two densities.

Biomass in October was on average 80% of that of March (p<0.001), having values in the range of 0 to2.5 g m -2. PL plots had significant lower AG biomass (about zero; p<0.05) than in the other two specific compositions (0.8 and 0.6 respectively for JP and MIX), independent of density. D3 plots had on average higher AG biomass (0.9 g m-2; p<0.05) compared to D1 (0.3 g m-2) but not compared to D2 (0.3 g m-2).

BG biomass in October was on average 0.2 g m-2, with a lower amount in PL plots (p<0.05). BG biomass in D3 plots (0.4 g m-2) was significantly higher than what observed in D1 (0.1 g m-2; p<0.05), but not in D2. D1 and D2 BG biomass were not different.

Concerning Juniperus phoenicea, its R/S in March was in the order of 0.9-0.6 in the monospecific and mixed plots, respectively, with no differences among the densities. Similarly, no effect of specific composition and density was observed in October, with values in the range of 0.5-0.6. Time did not affected R/S at all specific composition and densities.

Soil carbon and nitrogen

The soil N content was 0.11-0.17%; the soil C content varied between 1.2% and 2% (Tab. 2). No significant differences were found between the TOC content at the two depths and among densities and specific compositions, as also found for the TN values (Tab. 6). The C/N ratio was on average 11.5, not different at the two depths and among densities and specific compositions (Tab. 6).

Tab. 6 - Soil nutrient (± SE; n=3) just before the plantation at two depths. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between the two depths inside each parameter.

Discussion 

Seedling survival after eight months ranged between 40-50%. These values are similar to those reported in other studies concerning plantations in Mediterranean region with different species ([16], [64], [48]). Only P. lentiscus showed a very high mortality rates, similar to those found by Garcia-Fayos & Verdu ([24]) and Maestre et al. ([46]).

The high mortality rate is normally associated to summer aridity ([12], [13], [46]). In this study the late planting time (February), added to an early aridity in April 2006, when it rained only 7 mm (Fig. 4, Tab. 7), might have reduced root development before the occurrence of summer drought, affecting seedling survival ([38], [52]).

Fig. 4 - Monthly values of air temperature and precipitation during the years 2006: a) mean temperature (full circle with continuous line), mean maximum temperature (open square with short dashed line) and mean minimum temperature (closed triangles with long-dashed line); b) monthly precipitation. The climate station is located 1 km far from the plantation.
Tab. 7 - Average values of global radiation and air temperaturte and total precipitation during the year 2006. Concerning air temperature, the three values displayed are annual averages of the mean, minimum and maximum temperatures, respectively.

The different mortality observed among the three planted species could be related to the plant functional types (PFT) they belong. P. lentiscus is a hygrophytic sclerophyll shrub, while R. officinalis and J. phoenicea are both xerophytic with a semi-deciduous and a sclerophyll habit, respectively ([1]). P. lentiscus has an evergreen broad-leaf habit compared to the other two species: this characteristic makes it weaker in front of summer drought, when water table is not achievable, due to a lower control of water balance. Similarly, Gratani & Varone ([29]) asserted that during drought R. officinalis has a higher decrease of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance followed by a higher recovery capacity than P. lentiscus. In the future, physiological measurements will be necessary to make clear this issue.

Plants compete for water and nutrient resources, and this competition may result in a negative effect on growth and on seedlings survival ([39], [60]). Our results showed that higher densities had more biomass and had a tendency towards higher survival rates. This positive effect of density on biomass, concomitant with the unchanged R/S (at least for Juniperus) can be interpreted as a lack of interaction and competition among plants for water and nutrient resources, likely due to the small dimension of plants. The lack of difference in mortality rates of J. phoenicea and P. lentiscus in the mixed plots compared to those of the same species in the monospecific plots support the same conclusion.

Frequently in the past, afforestation practices were done in areas where crops were cultivated, where seed bank of forest species were not available, making difficult the succession and evolution of a stable ecosystem. Our intervention, on the contrary, was set up near a pine forest with an understory of P. lentiscus, Phillirea spp. and other maquis species. As reported by Bonet ([7]) and Pareliussen et al. ([53]), reforestation and restoration are likely to be more successful if efforts are focused on expanding the existing fragments of natural remnant vegetation supplying seed bank, rather than on establishing new fragments in openings.

Because of land abandonment, shrubs in the future will encroach ([28], [34]), whereas, because of climate change, Mediterranean forests will likely face considerable threats ([63]). In a recent work, Harris et al. ([31]) wondered how appropriate is to restore historical ecosystem types when facing rapidly changes of biophysical conditions. According to the same authors, recovery of threatened species and ecosystems will be more difficult to achieve in the future. Therefore, we used plants that can cope with the altered climate conditions ([33], [49], [2]). Experimental evidence showed that once established, those species have the ability to recover rapidly after sever drought effects ([32], [41], [58]), and to sustain elevated Net Ecosystem Exchange (NEE), comparable to forests, as a consequence of the relative low C loss via respiration.

According to the FAO Forest Resource Assessment ([23]), 30 million ha are covered by “other wooded lands”, including shrublands, in the Mediterranean basin. As far as Italy, the last National Inventory of Forest and Carbon INFC dated 2005 (⇒ INFC web site) reported that shrublands cover about 991.000 ha, that include about 690.100 ha of Mediterranean maquis and shrubs, while the remaining surface is covered by shrubs of sub-alpine and temperate climate. Considering their vast diffusion, efforts should be done to evaluate the potential of these ecosystems in sequestering C in order to achieve the Kyoto Protocol commitments. In this study, we measured plant biomass and soil C, representing the first step of the inventory along the time series. Therefore, only previsions can be merely assumed, given the need of long term monitoring, at least 5-10 years ([62], [68]). Some authors reported a woody biomass increment by 0.25-0.60 t ha-1 yr-1 ([59], [20]) for similar vegetation in Mediterranean climate.

In a Mediterranean environment, La Mantia et al. ([36]) showed a linear increase from 13 to 85 t C ha-1 of soil organic C along a soil chronosequence of 0-30 years after land abandonment. In an area close to our experimental plantation, covered by a 30-year old maquis, soil C is about 87 t C ha-1, which is in agreement with the data given by La Mantia et al. ([36]). Presently in our plantation, assuming a reasonable soil bulk density of about 1.1-1.2 g cm-3 ([9], [14]), soil C is about 0.7-0.8 t ha-1. Based on our soil CO2 emissions measurements (data not shown, but a likely estimation would be 7 t C ha-1 yr-1) and on the low biomass accumulation, the plantation will be a net C source in the first stages. This is in agreement with Paul et al. ([56]), who showed that soil C generally decreased in the first years after plantation, as an effect of the initial low C input from litter, while contemporarily the old C of the preceding agricultural phase continued to decompose, until this effect disappeared in the long term (> 30 years), when soil C became higher than in the preceding agricultural soil.

Conclusions 

Forest policy has changed in Italy and Europe during the last decades. The main goals that characterized forest plantations until last decades were to give job to people and to involuntary develop non-regenerating forests, especially in case of lack of management, as occurred for the Italian forests. The likely positive long-term impacts of afforestation activities in arid and semi-arid environments by shrubs species can make wonder if these types of plantations might be a valid alternative to classic revegetation activities when the goal of increasing biological diversity, reducing soil erosion and creating C sink are pursued ([57]). Higher densities and mixed specific composition seemed to better perform, allowing establishment of species with a strong pioneer behaviour and aridity resistant characteristics. Data collection on initial conditions and recurrent monitorings will be effective for evaluating the potential of C sequestration in the long-term by afforestation in semi-arid Mediterranean areas.

Acknowledgments 

The research was funded by the Ministry of Environment (Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela dell’Ambiente e del Mare) under the frame of a bilateral collaborative international programme (2006). We also would like to acknowledge the Regional Forest Service in the persons of Dr. Nudda, Dr. Caporali, Dr. D’Angelo, for the support on this research. Finally, we acknowledge Mr. Bianchi and all the workers of the Regional Forest Service for the support in the practical works and for logistics. We are particularly thankful to Dr. Alberto Masci and Dr. Abou Jaoudé Renée for their comments and suggestions.

Tab. 5 - ANOVA results of biomass data, calculated in February and March 2006.

References

(1)
Ain-Lhout F, Barradas MCD, Zunzunegui M, Rodríguez H, Novo FG, Vargas MA (2004). Seasonal differences in photochemical efficiency and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in six mediterranean shrub species under field conditions. Photosynthetica 42: 399-407.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(2)
Bartolomè J, Plaixats J, Fanlo R, Boada M (2005). Conservation of isolated Atlantic heathlands in the Mediterranean region: effects of land-use changes in the Montseny biosphere reserve (Spain). Biological Conservation 122: 81-88.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(3)
Begni G, Darras S, Hoepffner M, Pesin E, Tourre Y (2001). The present status of knowledge on Global Climatic Change; its regional aspects and impacts in the Mediterranean Region. A scientific and strategic report to Blue Plan. Medias France Groupement pour le developpement de la recherche sur l’environnement global notamment dans le bassin mediterraneen et l’Afrique subtropicale. December 7th 2001, Toulouse (France).
::Google Scholar::
(4)
Bellot J, Maestre FT, Chirino E, Hernández N, de Urbina JO (2004). Afforestation with Pinus halepensis reduces native shrub performance in a Mediterranean semiarid area. Acta Oecologica 25: 7-15.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(5)
Bianchi L, Calamini G, Gregori E, Paci M, Tani A, Zorn G (2005). Valutazione degli effetti del rimboschimento in zone aride della Sardegna. Italia Forestale e Montana 1: 47-66.
::Google Scholar::
(6)
Biondi E, Filigheddu R, Farris E (2001). Il paesaggio vegetale della Nurra (Sardegna nord-occidentale). Fitosociologia 38: 3-105.
::Google Scholar::
(7)
Bonet A (2004). Secondary succession of semi-arid Mediterranean old-fields in south-eastern Spain: insights for conservation and restoration of degraded lands. Journal of Arid Environments 56: 213-233.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(8)
Caravaca F, Alguacil MM, Figueroa D, Barea JM, Roldán A (2003a). Re-establishment of Retama sphaerocarpa as a target species for reclamation of soil physical and biological properties in a semi-arid Mediterranean area. Forest Ecology and Management 182: 49-58.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(9)
Caravaca F, Figueroa D, Alguacil MM, Roldán A (2003b). Application of composted urban residue enhanced the performance of afforested shrub species in a degraded semiarid land. Bioresource Technology 90: 65-70.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(10)
Caravaca F, Figueroa D, Azcón-Aguilar C, Barea JM, Roldán A (2003c). Medium-term effects of mycorrhizal inoculation and composted municipal waste addition on the establishment of two Mediterranean shrub species under semiarid field conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 97: 95-105.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(11)
Castro J, Zamora R, Hodar JA, Gomez JM (2002). Use of shrubs as nurse plant: a new technique for restoration in Mediterranean mountain. Restoration Ecology 10: 297-305.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(12)
Castro J, Zamora R, Hódar JA, Gómez JM (2004a). Seedling establishment of a boreal tree species (Pinus sylvestris) at its southernmost distribution limit: consequences of being in a marginal Mediterranean habitat. Journal of Ecology 92: 266-277.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(13)
Castro J, Zamora R, Hódar JA, Gómez JM, Gómez-Aparicio L (2004b). Benefits of using shrubs as nurse plants for reforestation in Mediterranean mountains: a 4-year study. Restoration Ecology 12: 352-358.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(14)
Celik I (2005). Land-use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research 83: 270-277.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(15)
Clemente AS, Werner C, Máguas C, Cabral MS, Martins-Loução MA, Correia O (2004). Restoration of a limestone quarry: effect of soil amendments on the establishment of native Mediterranean Sclerophyllous Shrubs. Restoration Ecology 12: 20-28.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(16)
Corona P (2005). Desertificazione, siccità, foreste e ricerca. Forest@ 2: 256-257.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(17)
Costantini EAC, Bocci M, L’Abate G, Fais A, Leoni G, Loy G, Magini S, Napoli R, Nino P, Paolanti M, Salvestrini L, Tascone F, Urbano F (2004). Mapping the state and risk of desertification in Italy by means of remote sensing, soil GIS and the EPIC model. Methodology Validation on the Island of Sardinia, Italy.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(18)
De Dato GD (2004). Effetti dei cambiamenti climatici sulla vegetazione arbustiva mediterranea: risultati della manipolazione ambientale nell’area sperimentale di Porto Conte (SS). Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Viterbo (Italy).
::Google Scholar::
(19)
De Dato GD, Pellizzaro G, Cesaraccio C, Sirca C, De Angelis P, Duce P, Spano D, Scarascia Mugnozza G (2008). Effects of warmer and drier climate conditions on plant composition and biomass production in a Mediterranean shrubland community. iForest 1: 39-48.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(20)
Eliason SA, Allen EB (1997). Exotic grass competition in suppressing native shrubland re-establishment. Restoration Ecology 245-255.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(21)
Estaún V, Savé R, Biel C (1997). AM inoculation as a biological tool to improve plant revegetation of a disturbed soil with Rosmarinus officinalis under semi-arid conditions. Applied Soil Ecology 6: 223-229.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(22)
FAO (2005). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO, Rome (Italy).
::Google Scholar::
(23)
Garcia-Fayos P, Verdu M (1998). Soil seed bank, factors controlling germination and establishment of a Mediterranean shrub: Pistacia lentiscus L. Acta Oecologica 19: 357-366.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(24)
Garcia C, Hernandez T, Roldan A, Martin A (2002). Effect of plant cover decline on chemical and microbiological parameters under Mediterranean climate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 5: 635-642.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(25)
Ginsberg P (2002). Planning and management of the afforestation process in Northern Israel. New Forests 24: 27-38.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(26)
Goberna M, Sánchez J, Pascual JA, García C (2007). Pinus halepensis Mill. plantations did not restore organic carbon, microbial biomass and activity levels in a semi-arid Mediterranean soil. Applied Soil Ecology 36: 107-115.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(27)
Goodale CL, Davidson EA (2002). Uncertain sinks in the shrubs. Nature 418: 593-594.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(28)
Gratani L, Varone L (2004). Adaptive photosynthetic strategies of the Mediterranean maquis species according to their origin. Photosynthetica 42: 481-486.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(29)
Green JJ, Baddeley JA, Cortina J, Watson CA (2005). Root development in the Mediterranean shrub Pistacia lentiscus as affected by nursery treatments. Journal of Arid Environments 61: 1-12.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(30)
Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006). Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14: 170-176.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(31)
Hastings SJ, Oechel WC, Muhlia-Melo A (2005). Diurnal, seasonal and annual variation in the net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a desert shrub community (Sarcocaulescent) in Baja California, Mexico. Global Change Biology 11: 927-939.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(32)
Hughes L (2003). Climate change and Australia: Trends, projections and impacts. Austral Ecology 28: 423-443.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(33)
Jackson RB, Banner JL, Jobbagy EG, Pockman WT, Wall DH (2002). Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grassland. Nature 418: 623-626.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(34)
Kassas M (1999). Rescuing drylands: a project for the world. Futures 31: 949-958.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(35)
La Mantia T, Oddo G, Rühl J, Furnari G, Scalenghe R (2007). Variazione degli stock di carbonio del suolo in seguito ai processi di abbandono dei coltivi: il caso studio dell’isola di Pantelleria (TP). Forest@ 4: 102-109.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(36)
Lal R (2001). Potential of desertification control to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. Climate Change 51: 35-72.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(37)
Lloret F, Casanovas C, Peñuelas J (1999). Seedling survival of Mediterranean shrubland species in relation to root:shoot ratio, seed size and water and nitrogen use. Functional Ecology 13: 210-216.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(38)
Löf M, Rydberg D, Bolte A (2006). Mounding site preparation for forest restoration: survival and short term growth response in Quercus robur L. seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 232: 19-25.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(39)
López-Bermúdez F, Romero-Díaz A, Martínez-Fernandez J, Martínez-Fernandez J (1998). Vegetation and soil erosion under a semi-arid Mediterranean climate: a case study from Murcia (Spain). Geomorphology 24: 51-58.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(40)
Luo H, Oechel WC, Hastings SJ, Zulueta R, Qian Y, Kwon H (2007). Mature semiarid chaparral ecosystems can be a significant sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide. Global Change Biology 13: 386-396.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(41)
Maestre FT, Bautista S, Cortina J (2003). Positive, negative, and net effects in grass-shrub interactions in Mediterranean semiarid grassland. Ecology 84: 3186-3197.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(42)
Maestre FT, Cortina J (2004). Are Pinus halepensis plantations useful as a restoration tool in semiarid Mediterranean areas? Forest Ecology and Management 198: 303-317.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(43)
Maestre FT, Cortina J, Bautista S (2004). Mechanism underlying the interaction between Pinus halepensis and the native late-successional shrub Pistacia lentiscus in a semi-arid plantation. Ecography 27: 776-786.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(44)
Maestre FT, Cortina J, Bautista S, Bellot J (2003). Does Pinus halepensis facilitate the establishment of shrubs in Mediterranean semi-arid afforestations? Forest Ecology and Management 176: 147-160.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(45)
Maestre FT, Cortina J, Vallejo R (2006). Are ecosystem composition, structure, and functional status related to restoration success? A test from semiarid Mediterranean steppes. Restoration Ecology 14: 258-266.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(46)
Martínez ML (2003). Facilitation of seedling establishment by an endemic shrub in tropical coastal sand dunes. Plant Ecology 168: 333-345.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(47)
Navarro Cerrillo RM, Fragueiro B, Ceaceros C, del Campo A, de Prado R (2005). Establishment of Quercus ilex L. subsp. ballota [Desf.] Samp. using different weed control strategies in southern Spain. Ecological Engineering 25: 332-342.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(48)
Ogaya R, Peñuelas J, Martinez-Vilalta J, Mangiron M (2003). Effect of drought on diameter increment of Quercus ilex, Phillyrea latifolia, and Arbutus unedo in a holm oak forest of NE Spain. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 175-184.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(49)
Olukoye GA, Wamicha WN, Kinyamario JI (2003). Assessment of the performance of exotic and indigenous tree and shrub species for rehabilitating saline soils of Northern Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 41: 164-170.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(50)
Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2006). The role of nurse plants in the restoration of degraded environments. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 196-202.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(51)
Padilla FM, Pugnaire FI (2007). Rooting depth and soil moisture control Mediterranean woody seedling survival during drought. Functional Ecology 21: 489-495.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(52)
Pareliussen I, Olsson EGA, Armbruster WS (2006). Factors limiting the survival of native tree seedlings used in conservation efforts at the edges of forest fragments in upland Madagascar. Restoration Ecology 14: 196-203.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(53)
Pariente S (2002). Spatial patterns of soil moisture as affected by shrubs, in different climatic conditions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 733: 237-251.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(54)
Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez T, Moreno JL, Ros M (2000). Soil microbial activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32: 1877-1883.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(55)
Paul KI, Polglase PJ, Nyakuengama JG, Khanna PK (2002). Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management 168: 241-257.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(56)
Pausas JG, Bladé C, Valdecantos A, Seva JP, Fuentes D, Alloza JA, Vilagrosa A, Bautista S, Cortina J, Vallejo R (2004). Pines and oaks in the restoration of Mediterranean landscapes of Spain: new perspectives for an old practice - a review. Plant Ecology 171: 209-220.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(57)
Pereira JS, Mateus JA, Aires LM, Pita G, Pio C, David JS, Andrade V, Banza J, David TS, Paço TA, Rodrigues A (2007). Net ecosystem carbon exchange in three contrasting Mediterranean ecosystems - the effect of drought. Biogeosciences 4: 791-802.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(58)
Peressotti A, Asunis C, Cesaraccio C (1999). Stima indiretta della biomassa e della copertura vegetale di un ecosistema mediterraneo a macchia: il caso della riserva naturale integrale Arca di Noè. In: “Monitoraggio di un ecosistema a macchia mediterranea: misure ecofisiologiche e micrometeorologiche”. CNR Istituto Nazionale per l’Analisi e la Protezione degli Agroecosistemi, Collana tecnico - scientifica INAPA, Quaderno n. 6.
::Google Scholar::
(59)
Perez-Devesa M, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A, Vallejo R (2008). Shrubland management to promote Quercus suber L. establishment. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 374-382.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(60)
Pietracaprina A (1989). La Nurra, sintesi monografica. Gallizzi Edizioni, Sassari (Italy).
::Google Scholar::
(61)
Post WM, Izaurralde RC, Mann LK, Bliss N (2001). Monitoring and verifying changes of organic carbon in soil. Climatic Change 51: 73-99.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(62)
Resco de Dios V, Fischer C, Colinas C (2007). Climate change effects on Mediterranean forests and preventive measures. New Forests 33: 29-40.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(63)
Rey Benayas JM, Camacho-Cruz A (2004). Performance of Quercus ilex saplings planted in abandoned Mediterranean cropland after long-term interruption of their management. Forest Ecology and Management 194: 223-233.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(64)
Rey Benayas JM, Navarro J, Espigares T, Nicolau JM, Zavala MA (2005). Effects of artificial shading and weed mowing in reforestation of Mediterranean abandoned cropland with contrasting Quercus species. Forest Ecology and Management 212: 302-314.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(65)
Rey Benayas JM, López-Pintor A, García C, de la Cámara N, Strasser R, Sal AG (2002). Early establishment of planted Retama sphaerocarpa seedlings under different levels of light, water and weed competition. Plant Ecology 159: 201-209.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(66)
Sarah P, Rodeh Y (2004). Soil structure variations under manipulations of water and vegetation. Journal of Arid Environments 58: 43-57.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(67)
Sudha P, Ramprasad V, Nagendra M, Kulkarni H, Ravindranath N (2007). Development of an agroforestry carbon sequestration project in Khammam district, India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12: 1131-1152.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(68)
USDA (1993). Soil Survey Manual. Washington, DC, USA.
::Google Scholar::
(69)
Valsecchi F (1976). Sui principali aspetti della vegetazione costiera della Nurra Nord-occidentale (Sardegna settentrionale). Giornale Botanico Italiano 110: 21-63.
::Google Scholar::
(70)
Yaalon DH (1997). Soils in the Mediterranean region: what makes them different? Catena 283-4: 157-169.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

Download

Paper Contents

Paper Sections

Paper Figures

Paper Tables