iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Impact of rainfall intensity and cutslope material on sediment concentration from forest roads in northern Iran

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 48-52 (2014)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0097-007
Published: Oct 21, 2013 - Copyright © 2014 SISEF

Research Articles

Forest roads are important for adequate management of natural resources, but they are also a dominant contributor of sediment to forest streams and water pollution. This study measured road sediment concentration from forest roads to determine the impact of rainfall intensity and cutslope types on sediment concentration in the Patom district of northern Iran. Two 110 m road segments with variable soil and rock fragment cover exposed at the cutslopes were studied. Seven rainfall and corresponding runoff events were measured in 1-liter bottle samplers every 10 minutes at the outlet of cross sectional culverts, and from two 3 m2 plots on the roadbeds adjacent to each cutslope. A statistically significant difference at the 95% confidence level between two cutslope types and rainfall intensity on sediment concentration was determined from the field data based on nonparametric tests, though no statistically significant difference in the concentration of sediment between the two roadbeds plots were found. The average of sediment concentration of soil trench and the rock fragment cover cutslopes were 60.3 and 46.8 g/l, respectively. The results reported here should help forest road managements to improve the understanding of cutslopes erosion and sediment production from forest roads and to employ suitable methods to reduce sediment production.

Forest Road, Cutslope, Rainfall Intensity, Rock Fragment, Sediment Concentration


Forests support a lot of ecosystem services, including primary products, secondary products, water supply, hydrological regulation, environmental purification, soil formation, soil conservation, biodiversity conservation, recreation, etc ([15]). In order to facilitate forestry operations in managed areas, a well developed network of roads is fundamental ([2]), providing access for management, wood utilization, ecotourism activities and fire control. In this context, suitable forest roads are crucial for sustainable management of forest resources. Nonetheless, forest roads are also recognized as a major source of erosion and can account for as much as 90% of all sediment production in forested watersheds ([40]). Erosion and sediment delivery to forest streams is a source of water pollution and global management problems. Previous studies have indicated that erosion rates are very low in natural and undisturbed forests ([8], [33], [9]). Sediment production rates from unpaved road surfaces have been estimated several orders of magnitude higher than undisturbed hillslopes ([25], [26], [27], [5]). Forests roads cause many local changes in the forested environments and induce changes to soil properties and hydrologic behavior of hillslopes, increase soil erosion and the incidence of mass movements ([13], [38], [20], [14]). The main factors that cause increased sediment delivery to forest streams are removing plant cover along the forest road pathway, compaction of the soil in the roadbed, interception of surface and sub-surface flows, constructions of cutslopes, and alteration of hillslope water pathways ([41]). Sediment delivered to forest streams cause water resource pollution, filling dams and may have impacts on aquatic habitat ([7], [34], [17], [18]).

Three methods are typically used to measure sediment produced from forest roads: (1) measurement in natural conditions with natural precipitation events (e.g., direct measurements from outlet of live streams culverts or using sediment traps - [21], [22], [37], [30], [39]); (2) use of a rainfall simulator ([23], [10]); and (3) use of empirical and physical sediment prediction models ([3], [9], [18]). Although field quantification methods are costly and time consuming ([11]), they should be preferred because sediment delivery occurs most efficiently at road-stream crossing where virtually most of the generated sediment is delivered to the streams ([19], [6]).

A potentially important contribution to forest road sediment production may come from cutslopes ([22], [23]). Ramos-Scharrón & MacDonald ([33]) showed that cutslope areas are responsible for about 9% of the total road segment sediment production. Luce & Black ([22]) examined the relationship between sediment production and road attributes such as distance between culverts, road gradient, road texture, and vegetation cover on cutslope. Their study indicated that sediment production was not correlated to the cutslope height, but sediment yield from cutslopes with cleared vegetation cover was about 7 times more than from road segments where vegetation was retained. Akay et al. ([3]) estimated sediment from forest roads delivered to streams using the SEDMODL model and GIS techniques. They showed that reducing rock cover of cutslopes caused a significant increase in sediment yield. In addition, they showed that in seasons with high intensity rainfalls, a considerable amount of sediment production in road sections with low quality surfacing might occur. Ramos-Scharrón & MacDonald ([33]) quantified sediment production and delivery rates in a dry tropical environment. They reported that cutslope sediment rates ranged from 20 to 170 Mg ha-1 yr-1, and unpaved roads had sediment production rates between 57 Mg ha-1 yr-1 for road with 2% slope up to 580 Mg ha-1 yr-1 for a road with 11% slope. Moreover, their study showed that unpaved roads were a dominant source of sediment and responsible for a 3-9 times increase in watershed-scale sediment yield relative to undisturbed conditions. Jordán-López et al. ([23]) in the Mediterranean area measured the impact of different parts of unpaved forest roads on runoff and sediment yield. They used a simple portable rainfall simulator on the cutslope, fillslope, and on the roadbed. They showed that cutslopes are the main source of sediment on forest roads with 486.7 g m-2 per storm. Total soil erosion on cutslopes was 3 and 18 times higher than those from the roadbeds and fillslopes, respectively.

Given the importance of erosion and sediment production from forest roads, knowledge of the road segments potential for erosion and impact of rainfall intensity on sediment production can help forest managers to identify sensitive segments for erosion control operations. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (1) assess the effect of different rainfall intensities on forest road sediment concentration; and (2) assess the role of two different cutslope types in sediment concentration in the Patom district in Iran.

  Material and methods 

Study site

The study area was located in the Patom district in the Kheyrud Forest Research Station of Tehran University, which is located at approximately 36° 38’ N and 50° 34’ E (Fig. 1). The Patom district has a 900 ha drainage area and ranges from 0 and 934 m a.s.l. in elevation. Average annual rainfall is 1300-1500 mm. The mean air temperature is 16.1 °C. The average of stand volume is about 55.76 m3 ha-1, dominant stand height 25-30 meters, 70% canopy cover and 263 stems ha-1. Dominant tree species are Carpinus betulus (Hornbeam), Fagus orientalis (Oriental Beech) and Parrotia persica (Persian Ironwood). The lithological substrate is mainly calcareous parent material and the associated soil types are Inceptisols and Alfisols ([36]). The length of the road network in the district is 16.3 km, with an average density of 18.1 m ha-1. Unpaved forest roads ascending from 620 m to 650 m a.s.l. were selected for this experiment. This road is used by wood utilization vehicles such as tracks and skidders and other passenger cars such as jeeps and touring cars.

Fig. 1 - Road network of Patom district (northern Iran) and location of studied culverts.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer


All culverts from the Patom district’s road were geo-referenced using a GPS receiver (GARMIN, COLORADO 300) and were exported to ArcGIS Desktop 9.3 as a map layer. Two live stream culverts along the road network were selected for sediment measurements after field observation, each representing two different types of cutslopes. Vegetation cover and rock fragment cover were determined using a 50 cm × 50 cm grid with cells of 0.25 cm2 ([23]). The slope angle of the soil surface on each cutslope was determined using a clinometer. Two selected cutslopes were similar in averages, with 30% gradient, 3 m slope length, and about 10% vegetation cover, but they were different in material. One cutslope had exposed more than 70% of soil (henceforth named “Soil Cutslope”), and the other had exposed more than 70% rock fragment cover (named “Rock Cutslope”). The width of the road was about 5.5 m with a moderate gradient ranging between 6-11% ([21]). The other road characteristics were the same for two road sections (Tab. 1).

Tab. 1 - Relevant characteristics of the cutslopes considered in this investigation.

Characteristic Soil cutslope Rock fragment cutslope
Lithology Calcareous Calcareous
Soil Inceptisol & Alfisol Inceptisol & Alfisol
Gradient (classify) Medium Medium
Travel way material Graveled Graveled
Vegetation cover Non (Removed) Non (Removed)
Width (m) 5.5 5.5
Age (years) 24 24
Length (m) 110 110
Cutslopes >70% soil >70 rock fragment

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

On both road segments, two 3-square-meters (3×1 m) bordered plots (3 m selected as plots length because it was equal to cutslopes slope length) were located randomly and installed using sheet metal borders with a runoff apron on the roadbed surface at the bottom of road length slope. The plots were named “Rplot” and “Splot” as they were located on the roadbeds associated to “Rock Cutslope” and “Soil Cutslope” road segments, respectively. Seven rainfall events were measured with a cylindrical, manual rain gauge, and samples of the sediment suspended were collected in 1-liter sampler bottles at every 10 min intervals from roadbed plots and at the outlet of culverts that accommodates runoff from roadbeds and cutslopes.

Sediment suspended concentration was carried out by decanting and filtering through a Wathman No. 42 paper under suction on a Buchner funnel in the lab ([12]). Papers containing sediment were then weighted and placed in a drying oven for 24 hours at about 105 °C ([29]).

The sediment contribution from cutslopes at the road segment scale was derived by subtracting roadbed sediment from the sediment that flows to the culvert outlet, which contains runoff from both the roadbed and the cutslope.

Average rainfall intensity was obtained by dividing rainfall height (mm) to rainfall duration (hour). According to Mahdavi ([28]) average rainfall intensity was classified as follows: (1) light rain (intensity < 2.5 mm h-1); (2) moderate rain (intensity between 2.5 and 7.5 mm h-1); and (3) heavy rain (intensity > 7.5 mm h-1).

Data analysis

Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test (α = 0.05) was initially applied to verify normal distributions of the variables considered ([35]). Kruskal-Wallis test was used to verify the null hypothesis of no impact of rainfall intensity on the sediment production from forest roads, while Mann-Whitney U test was applied to verify the null hypothesis of no differences in sediment productions from the two cutslope types ([35], [23]).

The relationship between average rainfall intensity and sediment concentration to the road culverts was analyzed using simple regression analysis of log-tranformed data.


Seven rainfall events were measured and classified as light rain, moderate rain and heavy rain. Rainfall intensity ranged between 2.2 up to 10.8 mm h-1 in the studied area. The number of rainfall events and the number of samples considered for each plot is reported in Tab. 2.

Tab. 2 - Number of rainfall events and sediment samples in each rainfall intensity classification.

Parameters Rainfall event Samples
Light rain 1 39
Moderate rain 4 36
Heavy rain 2 32
Total 7 107

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

All the variables analyzed did not show significant departures from normality after Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (P ≥ 0.05 - Tab. 3). Pooling data from the two plots analyzed, significant differences (P ≤ 0.001) among rainfall intensity classes were found after Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA: as rainfall intensity increases, sediment delivery increases accordingly (Tab. 4).

Tab. 3 - Results of Kolomogrov-Smirnov Normality Test. (N): number of samples collected during rainfall events.

Normality test Soil
± SD
± SD
Mean 60.32 ± 16.41 46.79 ± 26.42
N 57 50
Prob. 0.469 0.58

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Tab. 4 - Relationship between rainfall intensity classes and total sediment concentration (g/L). Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, P ≤0.001**.

Rainfall Classes Mean Sediment Concentration (g/l) ± SD
1 14.9 ± 6.81
2 52.2 ± 21.32
3 74.1 ± 30.56

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Significant differences in sediment delivery were also observed between the two cutslop types considered (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA - P ≤ 0.001). Hence, sediment concentration increased with rainfall intensity for both segment roads, but sediment concentration for the soil dominated cutslope was significantly higher than the rock dominated cutslope for any rainfall intensity class (Tab. 5).

Tab. 5 - Relationship between rainfall intensity classes and sediment delivered from road with rock fragment cutslope. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, P≤0.001*.

Rock Cutslope Soil Cutslope
Sediment mean
(g/l) ± SD
Sediment mean
(g/l) ± SD
1 6.0 ± 3.1 1 9.5 ± 4.7
2 16.6 ± 7.5 2 26.1 ± 11.3
3 32.4 ± 15.8 3 42.7 ± 21.4

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Mann-Whitney non-parametric test applied to data pooled over rainfall classes revealed significant differences between the two cutslope types (P = 0.024), confirming that on average sediment produced from the soil cutslope was higher than the rock fragment cutslope. On the other hand, we did not find any significant difference between Rplot and Spolt for the two roadbeds associated to the cutslopes (Tab. 6).

Tab. 6 - Mann-Whitney test to compare sediment concentration from two cutslope types and roadbeds plots.

Cases Mean of Sediment
(g/l) ± SD
Percentage (%)
Soil Cutslope 60.3 ± 26.4 91 0.024*
Splot 6.1 ± 2.9 9 -
Rock Cutslope 46.8 ± 16.4 80 0.215
Rplot 11.6 ± 7.4 20 -

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Results from the regression analysis showed that the relationship between the average rainfall intensity and the sediment concentration to the culverts from the two roads fits fairly well to a logarithmic function (Fig. 2). It is worth to notice that differences in sediment concentration between the two cutslope types becomes obvious for high-intensity events, while both types have very similar concentrations for low-intensity values of rainfall intensity.

Fig. 2 - Logarithmic relationship between average of rainfall intensity and sediment concentration.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer


In undisturbed forest systems, the kinetic energy of raindrops or water flow on the surface are reduced by tree canopy and soil litter, thus lessening soil erosion. Wischmeier & Smith ([42]) observed that kinetic energy of rainfall increases with rainfall intensity with a logarithmic rule. Young & Wiersma ([43]) showed that the impact energy of raindrops is the major force initiating soil detachment in a rainfall-simulation on three different soils. The mechanism by which a soil particle is detached from bulk soil mass is tensile failure ([31]). The soils particles must be detached from the bed against the resisting force of inter aggregate cohesion and their weight. Therefore when rainfall intensity increases, kinetic energy increases and soil particles with bigger size detach. Some of the soil big particles settled or trapped by vegetation and rubbles in the runoff path, also vegetation dissipates the runoff energy, this cause increases sediment with rainfall intensity had logarithmic relationship not linear relationship (Fig. 2, Tab. 4, Tab. 5). MacDonald & Coe ([24]) indicated that one factor affecting surface erosion from forest road surface is rainfall intensity (Fig. 2). Akay et al. ([3]) indicated that the effect of total precipitation was low on sediment production, but considerable amounts of sediment are produced during intense rainfall events. This is in agreement with our results, as different amounts of sediment were produced from cutslopes under different rainfall intensities (Tab. 4, Tab. 5).

The two roadbed segments associated to the two cutslope types were similar as for the material (Tab. 1) and construction method; we expected that sediment concentration from these segments would not display significant differences, and this hypothesis was supported by our findings (Tab. 6). So cutslope sediment concentration was derived by subtracting roadbed plots sediment to sediment samples collected from the outlet of culverts that accommodates runoff from roadbeds and cutslopes in each rainfall event. Our hypothesis agreed with our finding that roadbeds with similar materials and construction methods do not have a statistically different sediment concentration (Tab. 6) and therefore any difference in sediment concentration at the road outlet is due to the differences in the cutslope properties.

According to Poesen & Lavee ([32]) the influence of surface rock fragments on sediment yield from bare interrill areas largely depends on the effects of rock fragments on sub-surface flow and on sediment concentration. On the cutslope the rock fragments at the surface increased the roughness and the interception of raindrops, reducing soil detachment and sediment production. Jordán & Martínez-Zavala ([16]) observed that, in non-vegetated cutslopes, rock fragment cover may protect the soil surface from erosion. Jordán-López et al. ([23]) stated that the cutslope cover and rock fragment on soil texture are important factors for reducing runoff and sediment production. These results support our finding that cutslope material and type is effective on the sediment production.

Due to compaction of the soil surface, roadbeds had lower sediment concentration than cutslopes (Tab. 6). This finding is supported by Jordán & Martínez-Zavala ([16]) and Jordán-López et al. ([23]) who showed that sediment produced from roadbed was lower than cutslope.

Soil losses from forest roads require reconstruction and maintenance costs, and these encompass the majority of costs in forest management plans ([1]). Sediment suspended cause forest streams and aquatic habitat pollution. Boyd ([4]) observed that sediment suspended concentration higher than 20 g/l in streams cause confusion and disorder in the behavior of aquatic species. Although this study did not measure sediment suspended concentration in forest streams and aquatics habitats, it provides some information for forest managers to consider the roadbed and cutslope surface, and method to reduce sediment production and reduce stream pollution.


The cutslopes are the main source of sediment production (80-91%) on forest roads in northern Iran. For the two roads and road cutslopes, measured rainfall intensity was an important factor on detachment and delivery of sediment to streams.

Increasing rainfall intensity increased sediment concentration from two forest road segments. The road with a cutslope dominated by loose soil produced runoff with a higher sediment concentration than the cutslope dominated by a rock fragment cover.

Rock fragment cover is an important factor that conditions sediment concentrations on the road cutslopes. Also sediment produced from roadbeds was lower than cutslopes and there was not significant difference between two roadbeds with similar materials, construction method and age.

Forest roads managements should pay more attention to more sensitive sections of forest roads and road maintenance activities (such as increasing plant cover or rock fragment percentage) in order to reduce sediment production and prevent water pollution.


Abdi E, Majnounian B, Genet M, Rahimi H (2010). Quantifying the effects of root reinforcement of Persian Ironwood (Parrotia persica) on slope stability. Ecological Engineering 36: 1409-1416.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Abdi E, Rahbari-SiSakht S, Moghdami-Rad M (2012). Improving cross drain systems to minimize sediment delivery using GIS. Forestry Studies in China Journal 14 (4): 209-306.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Akay AE, Erdas O, Reis M, Yuksel A (2008). Estimating sediment yield from a forest road network by using a sediment prediction model and GIS techniques. Building and Environment 43 (5): 687-695.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Boyd CE (1990). Water quality management for pond fish culture. Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co., pp. 318.
Croke J, Wallbrink P, Fogarty H, Mockler P, McCormack S.B, Brophy J (1999). Managing sediment sources and movement in forests: the forest industry and water quality. Cooperative research centre for catchment hydrology. Industry Report 99/11
Online | Gscholar
Croke J, Mockler S, Fogarty P, Takken I (2005). Sediment concentration changes in runoff pathways from a forest road network and the resultant spatial pattern of catchment connectivity. Geomorphology 68 (3-4): 257-268.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Damian F (2003). Cross-drain placement to reduce sediment delivery from roads to streams. MS Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 207.
Dunne T (2001). Problems in measuring and modeling the influence of forest management on hydrologic and geomorphic processes. In: “Land use and watersheds: human iInfluence on hydrology and geomorphology in urban and forest areas” (Wigmosta MS, Burges SJ eds). American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 77-83.
Elliot WJ, Foltz RB, Robichaud PR (2009). Recent finding related to measuring and modeling forest road erosion. In: Proceedings of the “18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress” (Anderssen, RS, Braddock RD, Newham LTH eds). Cairns, (Australia) 13-17 July 2009
Online | Gscholar
Foltz RB, Copeland NS, Elliot WJ (2009). Reopening abandoned forest roads in northern Idaho, USA: quantification of runoff, sediment concentration, infiltration, and interrill erosion parameters. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 2542-2550.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Fu BL, Newham LTH, Ramos-Scharrón CE (2010). A review of surface erosion and sediment delivery models for unsealed roads. Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 1-14.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL, Gippel CJ, Nathan PJ (2004). Stream hydrology an introduction for ecologists (2 edn). John Wiley and Songs Ltd., UK, pp. 423.
Gresswell S, Heller D, Swanston DN (1979). Mass movement response to forest management in the central Oregon Cost ranges. Resource Bulletin PNW-84, USDA Forest Service, Portland, USA, pp. 26.
Gucinski H, Furniss M.J, Ziemer R.R, Brooks M (2001). Forest roads: a synthesis of scientific information. Gen. Technol. Rep. PNW-GTR-509, USDA Forest Service, Portland, USA, pp. 120.
Hayati E, Majnounian B, Abdi E (2012). Qualitative evaluation and optimization of forest road network to minimize total costs and environmental impacts. iForest 5: 121-125.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Jordán A, Martínez-Zavala L (2007). Soil loss and runoff rates on unpaved forest roads in southern Spain after simulatied rainfall. Forest Ecology and Management 228: 913-919.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Khalilpoor H, Hosseini S.A, Lotfalian M, Kooch Y (2008). The assessment of sediment production yield from forest road using sediment production model. Journal of Applied Science 8 (10): 1944-1949.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Khalilpoor H, Hosseini SA, Jalalvand H, Lotfalian M, Kooch Y, Akbari RAA, Sohrabi V (2010). Determination of most effective factor on sediment production due to road in forest mountainous roads. Journal of Applied Science 10 (9): 1069-1076.
Lane PNJ, Sheridan GJ (2002). Impact of an unsealed forest road stream crossing: water quality and sediment sources. Hydrological Processes 16 (13): 2599-2612.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Larsen MC, Parks JE (1997). How wide a road? The association of roads and mass-wasting in a forested montane environment. Earth Surface Process Landforms 22: 835-848.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Lewis J (1996). Turbidity-controlled suspended sediment sampling for runoff-event load estimation. Water Resources Research 32 (7): 2299-2310.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Luce CH, Black TA (1999). Sediment production from forest roads in western Oregon. 18. Water Resources Research 35 (8): 2561-2570.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Jordán-López A, Martínez-Zavala L, Bellinfante N (2009). Impact of different parts of unpaved forest roads on runoff and sediment yield in a Mediterranean area. Science of The Total Environment 407 (2): 937-944.
CrossRef | Gscholar
MacDonald LH, Coe DBR (2008). Road sediment production and delivery: processes and management. In: Proceedings of the “First World Landslide Forum. International Program on Landslides and International Strategy for Disaster Reduction”. United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 381-384.
MacDonald LH, Anderson DM, Dietrich WE (1997). Paradise threatened: land use and erosion on St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. Environmental Management 21 (6): 851-863.
CrossRef | Gscholar
MacDonald LH, Sampson RW, Anderson DM (2001). Runoff and road erosion at the plot and road segment scales, St. John, US Virgin Islands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26: 251-272.
CrossRef | Gscholar
MacDonald LH, Welsh M, Brown E, Libohova Z (2006). Middle east watershed monitoring and evaluation project: accuracy and associated with erosion monitoring using sediment traps. [Unpublished Report].
Mahdavi M (2005). Applied hydrology, vol. 1. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, pp. 342.
Malomo S, Obademi MO, Odedina PO, Adebo OA (1983). An investigation of the peculiar characteristics of laterite soils from southern Nigeria. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology 28 (1): 197-206.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Meadows M (2007). Personal communication and unpublished data of turbidity threshold measurements for Oak Creek Roads. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon State, USA.
Nearing MA, Bradford JM, Parker SC (1991). Soil detachment by shallow flow at low slopes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55 (2): 339.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Poesen J, Lavee H (1994). Rock fragments in top soils: significance and processes. Catena 23 (1-2): 1-28.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Ramos-Scharrón CE, MacDonald LH (2007). Measurement and prediction of natural and anthropogenic sediment sources, St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands. Catena 71 (2): 250-266.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Refahi HG (2006). Soil erosion by water and conservation. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, pp. 671.
Rodríguez-Pérez JR, Álvarez MF, Sanz-Ablanedo E (2007). Assessment of low-cost GPS receiver accuracy and precision in forest environments. Journal of Surveying Engineering 133 (4): 159-167.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Sarmadian F, Jafari M (2001). Forest soils in Kheiroudkenar forests. Natural Resources Journal (special Issue), pp. 103
Sheridan GJ, Noske PJ, Whipp RK, Wijesinghe N (2006). The effect of truck traffic and road water content on sediment delivery from unpaved forest roads. Hydrological Processes 20 (8): 1683-1699.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Sidle RC, Pearce AJ, O’Loughlin CL (1985). Hillslope stability and land use. Water Resources Monograph Series No 11, American Geophysical Union,
CrossRef | Gscholar
Surfleet CG (2008). Uncertainty in forest road hydrologic modeling and catchment scale assessment of forest road sediment yield. PhD thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, pp. 276.
Swift LW (1984). Soil losses from roadbeds and cut and fill slopes in the southern application mountains. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 8: 209-215.
Tague C, Band L (2001). Simulating the impact of road construction and forest harvesting on hydrologic response. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26 (2): 135-151.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1958). Rainfall energy and its relationship to soil loss. Transactions, American Geophysical Union 39 (2): 285.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Young RA, Wiersma JL (1973). The role of rainfall impact in soil detachment and transport. Water Resources Research 9 (6): 1629-1636.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

Saeed Rahbari Sisakht
Baris Majnounian
Ehsan Abdi
Forestry and Forest Economics Department, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj (Iran)
Mohsen Mohseni Saravi
Range and Watershed Management Department, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj (Iran)
Christoper Surfleet
Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR (USA)

Corresponding author

Saeed Rahbari Sisakht


Rahbari Sisakht S, Majnounian B, Mohseni Saravi M, Abdi E, Surfleet C (2014). Impact of rainfall intensity and cutslope material on sediment concentration from forest roads in northern Iran. iForest 7: 48-52. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0097-007

Academic Editor

Roberto Tognetti

Paper history

Received: Mar 14, 2012
Accepted: Apr 08, 2013

First online: Oct 21, 2013
Publication Date: Feb 03, 2014
Publication Time: 6.53 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2014

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 26349
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 20594
Abstract Page Views: 1249
PDF Downloads: 3492
Citation/Reference Downloads: 14
XML Downloads: 1000

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 3870
Overall contacts: 26349
Avg. contacts per week: 47.66

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Nov 2020)

Total number of cites (since 2014): 1
Average cites per year: 0.13


Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.


iForest Similar Articles


This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info