*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

*

Could cattle ranching and soybean cultivation be sustainable? A systematic review and a meta-analysis for the Amazon

Rafael da Silveira Bueno (1), Livia Marchetti (2)   , Claudia Cocozza (2), Marco Marchetti (3), Fabio Salbitano (2)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 285-298 (2021)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3779-014
Published: Jun 08, 2021 - Copyright © 2021 SISEF

Research Articles


Tropical forests are being destroyed to make space for agricultural activities with the assumption that they are required to feed the growing global population. Consequently, more sustainable practices are needed to guarantee food security and environmental protection of highly threatened natural biodiversity hotspots like the Amazon rainforest. Cattle ranching and soybean cultivation are by far the greater drivers of land use change and deforestation in the Amazon region. We performed a systematic review of papers related to these two main drivers and a meta-analysis on the effects of sustainable practices on different ecosystem services. The results of the review highlight a large concern about the negative impacts of cattle ranching and soybean crops on the ecosystem dynamics and functionality of the Amazon biome, in addition to the clear relationship with deforestation. Another relevant finding is the large gap in empirical research concerning the effects of sustainable practices on different ecosystem services. Such a gap is evident since only 13 studies from the initial database met the requirements for a meta-analysis. Of the 171 comparisons between the ecosystem services provided in conventional land-uses and those adopting sustainable practices, the overall model indicated a non-significant effect, although the results were heterogeneous. Crop yield and herbage biomass were negatively affected, while livestock productivity, soil organic carbon, soil fertility and woody biomass were positively affected. Also, the six sustainable practices evaluated showed different outcomes, from a predominance of positive effects in silvopastoral systems, to a predominance of negative effects on agrosilvicultural systems. Our systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that cattle ranching and soybean cultivation can indeed be conducted in a more sustainable way, enhancing the provision of ecosystem services while avoiding deforestation. In turn, our results also highlight the lack of empirical data and the need to standardize the methodologies used to deeply assess the effects of such practices. In conclusion, we suggest a way to advance research into the real effects of sustainable practices aimed at reducing the negative impacts of cattle ranching and soybean crops in the Amazon.

  Keywords


Tropical Forest, Agroforestry, Ecosystem Services, Silvopastoral Systems, Sustainable Practices, Cattle, Soybean

Authors’ address

(1)
Rafael da Silveira Bueno 0000-0001-8964-8572
Department of Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo (Italy)
(2)
Livia Marchetti
Claudia Cocozza 0000-0002-0167-8863
Fabio Salbitano 0000-0002-3592-9632
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence (Italy)
(3)
Marco Marchetti 0000-0002-5275-5769
Lab. of Global Ecology, Department of Biosciences and Territory, University of Molise, Pesche, IS (Italy)

Corresponding author

 
Livia Marchetti
livia.marchetti@unifi.it

Citation

da Silveira Bueno R, Marchetti L, Cocozza C, Marchetti M, Salbitano F (2021). Could cattle ranching and soybean cultivation be sustainable? A systematic review and a meta-analysis for the Amazon. iForest 14: 285-298. - doi: 10.3832/ifor3779-014

Academic Editor

Marco Borghetti

Paper history

Received: Feb 09, 2021
Accepted: Apr 12, 2021

First online: Jun 08, 2021
Publication Date: Jun 30, 2021
Publication Time: 1.90 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 3297
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 2047
Abstract Page Views: 336
PDF Downloads: 825
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 89

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 173
Overall contacts: 3297
Avg. contacts per week: 133.40

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Nov 2020)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Amézquita MC, Ibrahim M, Llanderal T, Buurman P, Amézquita E (2005)
Carbon sequestration in pastures, silvopastoral systems and forests in four regions of the Latin American Tropics. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21 (1): 31-49.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Amigo I (2020)
The Amazon’s fragile future. Nature 578: 505-507.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Ansolin RD, Timofeiczyk Junior R, Da Silva JCGL, Michetti M, Kamoi MYT, Dos Reis JC (2020)
Strategic diagnosis of livestock-forest integration systems in Northern Mato Grosso. Floresta 50 (1): 1001-1010.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Armenteras D, Murcia U, González TM, Barón OJ, Arias JE (2019)
Scenarios of land use and land cover change for NW Amazonia: impact on forest intactness. Global Ecology and Conservation 17: e00567.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Azevedo AA, Stabile MCC, Reis TNP (2015)
Commodity production in Brazil: combining zero deforestation and zero illegality. Elementa 3: 000076.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Barona E, Ramankutty N, Hyman G, Coomes OT (2010)
The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters 5: 024002.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Barros E, Neves A, Blanchart E, Fernandes ECM, Wandelli E, Lavelle P (2003)
Development of the soil macrofauna community under silvopastoral and agrosilvicultural systems in Amazonia. Pedobiologia 47 (3): 273-280.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Brandão A, Rausch L, Durán AP, Costa C, Spawn SA, Gibbs HK (2020)
Estimating the potential for conservation and farming in the Amazon and Cerrado under four policy scenarios. Sustainability 12 (3): 1277.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Borges WLB, Calonego JC, Rosolem CA (2019)
Impact of crop-livestock-forest integration on soil quality. Agroforestry Systems 93 (6): 2111-2119.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Buckley KJ, Newton P, Gibbs HK, McConnel I, Ehrmann J (2019)
Pursuing sustainability through multi-stakeholder collaboration: a description of the governance, actions, and perceived impacts of the roundtables for sustainable beef. World Development 121: 203-217.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Calle Z, Murgueitio E, Chará J (2012)
Integrating forestry, sustainable cattle-ranching and landscape restoration. Unasylva 63 (239): 31-40.
Online | Gscholar
(12)
Carvalho JLN, Raucci GS, Frazão LA, Cerri CEP, Bernoux M, Cerri CC (2014)
Crop-pasture rotation: a strategy to reduce soil greenhouse gas emissions in the Brazilian Cerrado. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 183: 167-175.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Carvalho PCF, Peterson CA, De Albuquerque Nunes PA, Martins AP, De Souza Filho W, Bertolazi VT, Kunrath TR, De Moraes A, Anghinoni I (2018)
Animal production and soil characteristics from integrated crop-livestock systems: toward sustainable intensification. Journal of Animal Science 96 (8): 3513-3525.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Carvalho R, De Aguiar APD, Amaral S (2020)
Diversity of cattle raising systems and its effects over forest regrowth in a core region of cattle production in the Brazilian Amazon. Regional Environmental Change 20 (2): 1821.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Celidonio OLM, Werner LS, Gil JDB (2019)
The determinants of recent soybean expansion in Mato Grosso, Brazil. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 22 (2): 173-191.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Cerri CC, Melillo JM, Feigl BJ, Piccolo MC, Neill C, Steudler PA, Carvalho MCS, Godinho VP, Cerri CEP, Bernoux M (2005)
Recent history of the agriculture of the Brazilian Amazon Basin: prospects for sustainable development and a first look at the biogeochemical consequences of pasture reformation. Outlook on Agriculture 34 (4): 215-223.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Chará J, Rivera J, Barahona R, Murgueitio E, Calle Z, Giraldo C (2019)
Intensive silvopastoral systems with Leucaena leucocephala in Latin America. Tropical Grasslands - Forrajes Tropicales 7 (4): 259-266.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Chung MG, Kapsar K, Frank KA, Liu J (2020)
The spatial and temporal dynamics of global meat trade networks. Scientific Reports 10: 16657.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Cortner O, Garrett RD, Valentim JF, Ferreira J, Niles MT, Reis J, Gil J (2019)
Perceptions of integrated crop-livestock systems for sustainable intensification in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 82: 841-853.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Cruz LG, Bastidas ATC, Suárez LR, Salazar JCS (2019)
Microbial properties of soil in different coverages in the Colombian Amazon. Floresta e Ambiente 26 (4): 33.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Cubillos AM, Vallejo VE, Arbeli Z, Terán W, Dick RP, Molina CH, Molina E, Roldan F (2016)
Effect of the conversion of conventional pasture to intensive silvopastoral systems on edaphic bacterial and ammonia oxidizer communities in Colombia. European Journal of Soil Biology 72: 42-50.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M (2010)
Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience 3: 178-181.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
De Carvalho P, Domiciano LF, Mombach MA, Do Nascimento HL, Da Silva Cabral L, Sollenberger LE, Pereira DH, Pedreira BC (2019)
Forage and animal production on palisadegrass pastures growing in monoculture or as a component of integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems. Grass and Forage Science 74 (4): 650-660.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
De Figueiredo EB, Jayasundara S, Bardonal RO, Berchielli TT, Reis RA, Wagner-Riddle C, La Scala NJ (2017)
Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of beef cattle in three contrasting pasture-management systems in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 142: 420-431.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
De Oliveira Resende L, Müller MD, Kohmann MM, Pinto LFG, Cullen Jr L, De Zen S, Rego LFG (2019)
Silvopastoral management of beef cattle production for neutralizing the environmental impact of enteric methane emission. Agroforestry Systems 94: 893-903.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
De Oliveira Silva R, Barioni LG, Pellegrino GQ, Moran D (2018)
The role of agricultural intensification in Brazil’s nationally determined contribution on emissions mitigation. Agricultural Systems 161: 102-112.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
De Souza DM, Petre R, Jackson F, Hadarits M, Pogue S, Carlyle CN, Bork E, McAllister T (2017)
A review of sustainability enhancements in the beef value chain: state-of-the-art and recommendations for future improvements. Animals 7 (12): 26.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
De Stefano A, Jacobson MG (2018)
Soil carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems: a meta-analysis. Agroforestry Systems 92: 285-299.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Dias-Filho MB (2015)
Estratégias de recuperação de pastagens degradadas na Amazônia brasileira [Strategies for degraded pastures recuperation in the Brazilan Amazon]. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, Belém, Brazil, pp. 12-13. [in Portuguese]
Gscholar
(30)
Dobson AP, Pimm SL, Hannah L, Kaufman L, Ahumada JA, Ando AW, Bernstein A, Busch J, Daszak P, Engelmann J, Kinnaird MF, Li BV, Loch-Temzelides T, Lovejoy T, Nowak K, Roehrdanz PR, Vale MM (2020)
Ecology and economics for pandemic prevention. Science 369 (6502): 379-381.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Domiciano LF, Pedreira BC, Da Silva NMF, Mombach MA, Chizzotti FHM, Batista ED, Carvalho P, Cabral LS, Pereira DH, Do Nascimento HLB (2020)
Agroforestry systems: an alternative to intensify forage-based livestock in the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 94: 1839-1849.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Domingues MS, Bermann C (2012)
O arco de desflorestamento na Amazônia: da pecuária à soja. [The arc of deforestation in the Amazon: from livestock to soybean]. Ambiente e Sociedade 15 (2): 1-22. [in Portuguese]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(33)
Dos Reis JC, Kamoi MYT, Latorraca D, Chen RFF, Michetti M, Wruck FJ, Garrett RD, Valentim JF, Rodrigues RAR, Rodrigues-Filho S (2019)
Assessing the economic viability of integrated crop-livestock systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 35 (6): 631-642.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Dou Y, Da Silva RFB, Hongbo Y, Jianguo L (2018)
Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon. Journal of Geographical Sciences 28 (11): 1715-1732.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
Dubeux-Junior JCB, Muir JP, Apolinário VXO, Nair PKR, Lira MA, Sollenberger LE (2017)
Tree legumes: an underexploited resource in warm-climate silvopastures. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 46 (8): 689-703.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(36)
Eri M, Da Silva Jr CA, Lima M, La Scala Jr N, De Oliveira-Júnior JF, Teodoro PE, Capristo-Silva GF, Caione G, Peres CA (2020)
Capitalizing on opportunities provided by pasture sudden death to enhance livestock sustainable management in Brazilian Amazonia. Environmental Development 33 (6): 100499.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
FAO/CIFOR (2019)
Framework methodology for climate change vulnerability assessments of forests and forest dependent people. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 22-23.
Gscholar
(38)
FAO/UNEP (2020)
The State of World’s Forests 2020. Forests, biodiversity and people. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 82-88.
Gscholar
(39)
Fearnside PM (2001)
Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation 28 (1): 23-28.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Galimberti A, Cena H, Campone L, Ferri E, Dell’Agli M, Sangiovanni E, Belingheri M, Riva MA, Casiraghi M, Labra M (2020)
Rethinking urban and food policies to improve citizens safety after COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Nutrition 7: 569542.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(41)
Garrett RD, Carlson KM, Rueda X, Noojipady P (2016)
Assessing the potential additionality of certification by the roundtable on responsible soybeans and the roundtable on sustainable palm oil. Environmental Research Letters 11 (4): 045003.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(42)
Garrett RD, Gardner TA, Morello TF, Marchand S, Barlow J, De Blas DE, Ferreira J, Lees AC, Parry L (2017)
Explaining the persistence of low income and environmentally degrading land uses in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecology and Society 22 (3): 27.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(43)
Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J, Schelly I, Morton DC, Noojipady P, Soares-Filho B, Barreto P, Micol L, Walker NF (2015)
Brazil’s Soy Moratorium: supply-chain governance is needed to avoid deforestation. Science 347 (6220): 377-378.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(44)
Gibbs HK, Munger J, L’Roe J, Barreto P, Pereira R, Christie M, Amaral T, Walker NF (2016)
Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian Amazon? Conservation Letters 9 (1): 32-42.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(45)
Gil J, Siebold M, Berger T (2015)
Adoption and development of integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 199: 394-406.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(46)
Gil JDB, Garrett R, Berger T (2016)
Determinants of crop-livestock integration in Brazil: evidence from the household and regional levels. Land Use Policy 59: 557-568.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(47)
Gil JDB, Garrett RD, Rotz A, Daioglou V, Valentim J, Pires GF, Costa MH, Lopes L, Reis JC (2018)
Tradeoffs in the quest for climate smart agricultural intensification in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Environmental Research Letters 13 (6): 064025.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(48)
Gollnow F, Lakes T (2014)
Policy change, land use, and agriculture: the case of soy production and cattle ranching in Brazil, 2001-2012. Applied Geography 55: 203-211.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(49)
Gollnow F, De Barros Viana Hissa L, Rufin P, Lakes T (2018)
Property-level direct and indirect deforestation for soybean production in the Amazon region of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Land Use Policy 78: 377-385.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(50)
Gomes FJ, Pedreira BC, Santos PM, Bosi C, Lulu J, Pedreira CGS (2020)
Microclimate effects on canopy characteristics of shaded palisadegrass pastures in a silvopastoral system in the Amazon biome of central Brazil. European Journal of Agronomy 115: 126029.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(51)
Green JMH, Croft SA, Durán AP, Balmford AP, Burgess ND, Fick S, Gardner TA, Godar J, Suavet C, Virah-Sawmy M, Young LE, West CD (2019)
Linking global drivers of agricultural trade to on-the-ground impacts on biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 116 (46): 23202-23208.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(52)
Guéneau S (2018)
Neoliberalism and the emergence of private sustainability initiatives: the case of the Brazilian cattle value chain. Business Strategy and the Environment 27 (2): 240-251.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(53)
Hampf AC, Stella T, Berg-Mohnicke M, Kawohl T, Kilian M, Nendel C (2020)
Future yields of double-cropping systems in the Southern Amazon, Brazil, under climate change and technological development. Agricultural Systems 177 (3): 102707.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(54)
Havlík P, Valin H, Herrero M, Obersteiner M, Schmid E, Rufino MC, Mosnier A, Thornton PK, Böttcher H, Conant RT, Frank S, Fritz S, Fuss S, Kraxner F, Notenbaert A (2014)
Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111 (10): 3709-3714.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(55)
Henders S, Persson UM, Kastner T (2015)
Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environmental Research Letters 10 (12): 125012.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(56)
Hoelle J (2014)
Cattle culture in the Brazilian Amazon. Human Organization 73 (4): 363-374.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(57)
Hohnwald S, Rischkowsky B, Camarão AP, Schultze-Kraft R, Rodrigues Filho JA, King JM (2006)
Integrating cattle into the slash-and-burn cycle on smallholdings in the Eastern Amazon, using grass-capoeira or grass-legume pastures. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 117 (4): 266-276.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(58)
Hohnwald S, Rischkowsky B, King JM, Camarão AP, Rodrigues Filho JA, Zeppenfeld T (2015)
Intensive cattle browsing did not prevent fallow recuperation on smallholder grass-capoeira pastures in the NE-Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 89 (5): 813-828.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(59)
Junior NAV, Silva MA, Caramori P, Nitsche P, Corrêa K, Alves D (2019)
Temperature, thermal comfort, and animal ingestion behavior in a silvopastoral system. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias 40: 403-416.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(60)
Kastens JH, Brown JC, Coutinho AC, Bishop CR, Esquerdo JCDM (2017)
Soy moratorium impacts on soybean and deforestation dynamics in Mato Grosso, Brazil. PLoS One 12 (4): e0176168.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(61)
Kehoe L, Romero-Muñoz A, Polaina E, Estes L, Kreft H, Kuemmerle T (2017)
Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Nature Ecology and Evolution 1 (8): 1129-1135.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(62)
Landholm DM, Pradhan P, Wegmann P, Romero Sánchez MA, Suárez Salazar JC, Kropp JP (2019)
Reducing deforestation and improving livestock productivity: greenhouse gas mitigation potential of silvopastoral systems in Caquetá. Environmental Research Letters 14 (11): 114007.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(63)
Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN, Valentim JF, Ramos F, Alves-Pinto HN (2014)
Intensification of cattle ranching production systems: socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil. Animal 8 (8): 1255-1263.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(64)
Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN, Silva D, Alves-Pinto HN, Feltran-Barbieri R, Castro A, Iribarrem A, Rangel MC, Kalif KAB, Gardner T, Beduschi F (2017)
Improving land management in Brazil: a perspective from producers. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment 240: 276-286.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(65)
Lathuillière MJ, Solvik K, Macedo MN, Graesser J, Miranda EJ, Couto EG, Johnson MS (2019)
Cattle production in Southern Amazonia: implications for land and water management. Environmental Research Letters 14 (11): 114025.
Online | Gscholar
(66)
Le Polain De Waroux Y, Garrett RD, Graesser J, Nolte C, White C, Lambin EF (2019)
The restructuring of South American soy and beef production and trade under changing environmental regulations. World Development 121: 188-202.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(67)
Lerner AM, Rudel TK, Schneider LC, McGroddy M, Burbano DV, Mena CF (2015)
The spontaneous emergence of silvopastoral landscapes in the Ecuadorian Amazon: patterns and processes. Regional Environmental Change 15 (7): 1421-1431.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(68)
Lerner AM, Zuluafa AF, Chará J, Etter A, Searchinger T (2017)
Sustainable cattle ranching in practice: moving from theory to planning in Colombia’s livestock sector. Environmental Management 60 (2): 176-184.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(69)
Lima M, Da Silva Jr CA, Rausch L, Gibbs HK, Johann JA (2019)
Demystifying sustainable soy in Brazil. Land Use Policy 82: 349-352.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(70)
Loker WM (1994)
Where’s the beef? Incorporating cattle into sustainable agroforestry systems in the Amazon Basin. Agroforestry Systems 25 (3): 227-241.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(71)
Lovejoy TE, Nobre C (2019)
Amazon tipping point: last chance for action. Science Advances 5: eaba2949.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(72)
Magalhães CAS, Pedreira BC, Tonini H, Farias Neto AL (2019)
Crop, livestock and forestry performance assessment under different production systems in the north of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Agroforestry Systems 93 (6): 2085-2096.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(73)
Magdoff F (2011)
Ecological civilization. Monthly Review 62 (8): 1-25.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(74)
Maranhão RLA, De Carvalho Junior OA, Hermuche PM, Gomes RAT, Pimentel CMM, Guimarães RF (2019)
The spatiotemporal dynamics of soybean and cattle production in Brazil. Sustainability 11 (7): 2150.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(75)
Marchetti M (2005)
Sulla questione della distruzione delle foreste tropicali, riflessioni dopo un viaggio nell’Amazzonia brasiliana [About tropical forests destruction, considerations after a journey in the Brazilian Amazon]. In: “Foreste Ricerca Cultura” (Corona P, Iovino F, Maetzke F, Marchetti M, Menguzzato G, Nocentini S, Portoghesi L eds). Coppini Editore, Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, Firenze, Itay, pp. 361-380.
Gscholar
(76)
Marchetti L, Cattivelli V, Cocozza C, Salbitano F, Marchetti M (2020)
Beyond sustainability in food systems: perspectives from agroecology and social innovation. Sustainability 12 (18): 7524.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(77)
Marengo JA (2006)
On the hydrological cycle of the Amazon basin: a historical review and current state-of-the-art. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia 21 (3): 1-19.
Online | Gscholar
(78)
Martorano LG, Siviero MA, Tourne DCM, Vieira SB, Fitzjarrald DR, Vettorazzi CA, Brienza Jr S, Yeared JAG, Meyering E, Lisboa LSS (2016)
Agriculture and forest: a sustainable strategy in the Brazilian Amazon. Australian Journal of Crop Science 10 (8): 1136-1143.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(79)
McKay B, Colque G (2015)
Bolivia’s soy complex: the development of “productive exclusion”. The Journal of Peasant Studies 43 (2): 583-610.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(80)
MEA (2005)
Ecosystems and human well-being. A framework for assessment. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 53-60.
Gscholar
(81)
Medina G, Dos Santos AP (2017)
Curbing enthusiasm for Brazilian agribusiness: the use of actor-specific assessments to transform sustainable development on the ground. Applied Geography 85: 101-112.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(82)
Montagnini F (2008)
Management for sustainability and restoration of degraded pastures in the neotropics. In: “Post-Agricultural Succession in the Neotropics”. Springer, New York, USA, pp. 265-295.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(83)
Montagnini F, Ibrahim M, Murgueitio Restrepo E (2013)
Silvopastoral systems and climate change mitigation in Latin America. Bois et Forets des Tropiques 67 (316): 3-16.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(84)
Moreira GM, Lima Neves JC, Magalhães CAS, De Farias Neto AL, Sauer G, Silva JFV, Fernandes RBA (2018)
Soil chemical attributes in response to tree distance and sun-exposed faces after the implantation of an integrated crop-livestock-forestry system. Revista Árvore 42 (4): 317.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(85)
Mosquera O, Buurman P, Ramirez BL, Amezquita MC (2012)
Carbon stocks and dynamics under improved tropical pasture and silvopastoral systems in Colombian Amazonia. Geoderma 189-190 (4): 81-86.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(86)
Müller R, Pistorius T, Rohde S, Gerold G, Pacheco P (2013)
Policy options to reduce deforestation based on a systematic analysis of drivers and agents in lowland Bolivia. Land Use Policy 30 (1): 895-907.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(87)
Müller-Hansen F, Heitzig J, Donges JF, Cardoso MF, Dalla-Nora EL, Andrade P, Kurths J, Thonicke K (2019)
Can intensification of cattle ranching reduce deforestation in the Amazon? Insights from an agent-based social-ecological model. Ecological Economics 159: 198-211.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(88)
Murgueitio E, Calle Z, Uribe F, Calle A, Solorio B (2011)
Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. Forest Ecology and Management 261 (10): 1654-1663.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(89)
Murgueitio E, Chará JD, Solarte AJ, Uribe F, Zapata C, Rivera JE (2013)
Agroforestería pecuaria y sistemas silvopastoriles intensivos (SSPi) para la adaptación ganadera al cambio climático con sostenibilidad [Livestock agroforestry and intensive silvopastoral systems (SSPi) for sustainable livestock adaptation to climate change]. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias 26: 313-316. [in Portuguese]
Gscholar
(90)
Nepstad D, McGrath D, Stickler C, Alencar A, Azevedo A, Swette B, Bezerra T, DiGiano M, Shimada J (2014)
Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344 (6188): 1118-1123.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(91)
Nepstad LS, Gerber JS, Hill JD, Dias LCP, Costa MH, West PC (2019)
Pathways for recent Cerrado soybean expansion: extending the soy moratorium and implementing integrated crop livestock systems with soybeans. Environmental Research Letters 14 (4): 044029.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(92)
Oliveira BS, De Carvalho MAC, Lange A, Wruck FJ, Dallacort R, Da Silva VP, Barea M (2017)
Atributos físicos do solo em sistema de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta, na região Amazônica. [Soil physical attributes in crop-livestock-forest integration in the Amazon region]. Espacios 38 (41): 8. [in Portuguese]
Online | Gscholar
(93)
Oliveira JM, Madari BE, Carvalho MTM, Assis PCR, Silveira RS, Lima ML, Wruck FJ, Medeiros JC, Machado PLOA (2018)
Integrated farming systems for improving soil carbon balance in the southern Amazon of Brazil. Regional Environmental Change 18 (1): 105-116.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(94)
Pedrosa LM, Hoshide AK, De Abreu DC, Molossi L, Couto EG (2019)
Financial transition and costs of sustainable agricultural intensification practices on a beef cattle and crop farm in Brazil’s Amazon. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 36 (1): 26-37.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(95)
Pettenella D, Masiero M (2020)
Deforestation made in Italy. Le responsabilità delle imprese e dei consumatori italiani nella deforestazione dei paesi tropicali [Deforestation made in Italy. Enterprises’ and Italian consumers’ responsiblity for tropical deforestation]. ETIFOR Srl, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy. pp. 77-79. [in Italian]
Online | Gscholar
(96)
Petter FA, De Lima LB, De Morais LA, Tavanti RFR, Nunes ME, Freddi OS, Marimon Jr BH (2017)
Carbon stocks in oxisols under agriculture and forest in the southern Amazon of Brazil. Geoderma Regional 11: 53-61.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(97)
Picoli MCA, Rorato A, Leitão P, Camara G, Maciel A, Hostert P, Sanches IDA (2020)
Impacts of public and private sector policies on soybean and pasture expansion in Mato Grosso-Brazil from 2001 to 2017. Land 9 (1): 20.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(98)
Pizarro D, Vásquez H, Bernal W, Fuentes E, Alegre J, Castillo MS, Gómez C (2020)
Assessment of silvopasture systems in the northern Peruvian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 94 (1): 173-183.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(99)
Plieninger T, Hui C, Gaertner M, Huntsinger L (2014)
The impact of land abandonment on species richness and abundance in the Mediterranean Basin: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 9 (5): e98355.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(100)
R Core Team (2019)
R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.6.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Online | Gscholar
(101)
Rausch LL, Gibbs HK, Schelly I, Brandão Jr A, Morton DC, Carneiro Filho A, Strassburg B, Walker N, Noojipady Barreto P, Meyer D (2019)
Soy expansion in Brazil’s Cerrado. Conservation Letters 12 (6): e12671.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(102)
Rittl TF, Oliveira D, Cerri CEP (2017)
Soil carbon stock changes under different land uses in the Amazon. Geoderma Regional 10: 138-143.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(103)
Rudorff BFT, Adami M, Aguiar DA, Moreira MA, Mello MP, Fabiani L, Amaral DF, Pires BM (2011)
The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sensing 3 (1): 185-202.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(104)
Sauer S (2018)
Soy expansion into the agricultural frontiers of the Brazilian Amazon: the agribusiness economy and its social and environmental conflicts. Land Use Policy 79: 326-338.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(105)
Schultze-Kraft R, Rao IM, Peters M, Clements RJ, Bai C, Liu G (2018)
Tropical forage legumes for environmental benefits: an overview. Tropical Grasslands - Forrajes Tropicales 6 (1): 1-14.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(106)
Silva CA, Lima M (2018)
Soy moratorium in Mato Grosso: deforestation undermines the agreement. Land Use Policy 71: 540-542.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(107)
Silva AR, Schwartz G (2019)
Sobrevivência e crescimento inicial de espécies florestais em sistema de integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta no leste da Amazônia [Forest species survival and initial growth in crop-livestock-forest integration in the Eastern Amazon]. Revista em Agronegocio e Meio Ambiente 12 (1): 45-63. [in Portuguese]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(108)
Silva JCN, Silva AR, Veloso CAC, Dantas EF, Do Sacramento JAAS (2018)
Aggregation, carbon, and total soil nitrogen in crop-livestock-forest integration in the Eastern Amazon. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental 22 (12): 837-842.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(109)
Soares MB, Freddi OS, Matos ES, Tavanti RFR, Wruck FJ, De Lima JP, Marchioro V, Franchini JC (2020)
Integrated production systems: an alternative to soil chemical quality restoration in the Cerrado-Amazon ecotone. Catena 185: 104279.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(110)
Soterroni AC, Ramos FM, Mosnier A, Fargione J, Andrade PR, Baumgarten L, Pirker J, Obersteiner M, Kraxner F, Câmara G, Carvalho AXY, Polasky S (2019)
Expanding the soy moratorium to Brazil’s Cerrado. Science Advances 5 (7): eaav7336.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(111)
Strassburg BBN, Latawiec AE, Barioni LG, Nobre CA, Da Silva VP, Valentim JF, Vianna M, Assad ED (2014)
When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Global Environmental Change 28 (1): 84-97.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(112)
Sullivan MJ, Talbot J, Lewis SL, Phillips OL, Qie L, Begne SK, Chave J, Cuni-Sanchez A, Hubau W, Lopez-Gonzalez G, Miles L, Monteagudo-Mendoza A, Sonké B, Sunderland T, ter Steege H, White LJ, Affum-Baffoe K, Aiba Si, de Almeida EC, de Oliveira EA, Alvarez-Loayza P, Dávila EÁ, Andrade A, Aragão LE, Ashton P, Aymard C. GA, Baker TR, Balinga M, Banin LF, Baraloto C, Bastin JF, Berry N, Bogaert J, Bonal D, Bongers F, Brienen R, Camargo JL, Cerón C, Moscoso VC, Chezeaux E, Clark CJ, Pacheco ÁC, Comiskey JA, Valverde FC, Coronado EN, Dargie G, Davies SJ, De Canniere C, Djuikouo K. MN, Doucet JL, Erwin TL, Espejo JS, Ewango CE, Fauset S, Feldpausch TR, Herrera R, Gilpin M, Gloor E, Hall JS, Harris DJ, Hart TB, Kartawinata K, Kho LK, Kitayama K, Laurance SG, Laurance WF, Leal ME, Lovejoy T, Lovett JC, Lukasu FM, Makana JR, Malhi Y, Maracahipes L, Marimon BS, Junior BH, Marshall AR, Morandi PS, Mukendi JT, Mukinzi J, Nilus R, Vargas PN, Camacho NC, Pardo G, Peña-Claros M, Pétronelli P, Pickavance GC, Poulsen AD, Poulsen JR, Primack RB, Priyadi H, Quesada CA, Reitsma J, Réjou-Méchain M, Restrepo Z, Rutishauser E, Salim KA, Salomão RP, Samsoedin I, Sheil D, Sierra R, Silveira M, Slik JW, Steel L, Taedoumg H, Tan S, Terborgh JW, Thomas SC, Toledo M, Umunay PM, Gamarra LV, Vieira IC, Vos VA, Wang O, Willcock S, Zemagho L (2017)
Diversity and carbon storage across the tropical forest biome. Scientific Reports 7 (1): 401.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(113)
Torralba M, Fagerholm N, Burgess PJ, Moreno G, Plieninger T (2016)
Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 230: 150-161.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(114)
Vale P, Gibbs H, Vale R, Christie M, Florence E, Munger J, Sabaini D (2019)
The expansion of intensive beef farming to the Brazilian Amazon. Global Environmental Change 57 (6): 101922.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(115)
Valentine JC, Pigott TD, Rothstein HR (2010)
How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 35 (2): 215-247.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(116)
Voora V, Larrea C, Bermudez S (2020)
Global market report: soybean. Sustainable Commodities Marketplace Series 2019, The International Institute for Sustainable Development - IISD, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, pp. 20.
Online | Gscholar
(117)
zu Ermgassen EKHJ, De Alcantara MP, Balmford A, Barioni L, Beduschi Neto F, Bettarello MMF, De Brito G, Carrero GC, Florence EAS, Garcia E, Gonçalves ET, Da Luz CS, Mallman GM, Strassburg BBN, Valentim JF, Latawiec A (2018)
Results from on-the-ground efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon. Sustainability 10 (4): 1301.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(118)
zu Ermgassen EK, Ayre B, Godar J, Bastos Lima MG, Bauch S, Garrett R, Green J, Lathuillière MJ, Löfgren P, Macfarquhar C, Meyfroidt P, Suavet C, West C, Gardner T (2020)
Using supply chain data to monitor zero deforestation commitments: an assessment of progress in the Brazilian soy sector. Environmental Research Letters 15 (3): 035003.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info