*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

*

Public perceptions of forests across Italy: an exploratory national survey

Giuseppe Carrus (1)   , Angelo Panno (2), Juan Ignacio Aragones (3), Marco Marchetti (4), Renzo Motta (5), Giustino Tonon (6), Giovanni Sanesi (7)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 323-328 (2020)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3394-013
Published: Jul 28, 2020 - Copyright © 2020 SISEF

Research Articles


In a context of progressive expansion of the Italian forest area, we present the results of a national survey exploring public perception of forests across different geographical scales in Italy. Perceptions of forests are assessed in relation to popular beliefs on relevant environmental issues such as countering climate change, protecting biodiversity, and promoting social cohesion and environmental education. Participants (N = 1059) living in five different regions of Northern (Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol, Piemonte), Central (Lazio, Molise) and Southern Italy (Puglia), were recruited in the survey and completed a paper-and-pencil questionnaire. Survey questions regarded the estimated percentage of forest cover, the perceived importance of different environmental issues and of different material and non-material forest products, as well as participants’ perceptions regarding connectedness to nature. Results revealed a generalized tendency to overestimate the extension of forest surface area in the participants’ region, in Italy, and in the European Union. Results also showed high scores for participants’ perceived importance of environmental issues, such as climate change and biodiversity protection, and in their belief that forests could play a positive role in addressing these issues and providing important outcomes and benefits for the quality of human life, such as health and well-being or social cohesion.

  Keywords


Forest Perceptions, Nature Experience, Environmental Attitudes, Environmental Issues

Authors’ address

(1)
Giuseppe Carrus 0000-0003-1680-1657
Roma Tre University, Department of Education, Rome (Italy)
(2)
Angelo Panno 0000-0002-6516-161X
European University of Rome, Department of Human Science, Rome (Italy)
(3)
Juan Ignacio Aragones 0000-0001-9139-4225
Complutense University of Madrid, Department of Psychology, Madrid (Spain)
(4)
Marco Marchetti 0000-0002-5275-5769
University of Molise, Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio (Italy)
(5)
Renzo Motta 0000-0002-1631-3840
University of Turin, Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, Turin (Italy)
(6)
Giustino Tonon 0000-0002-4851-0662
Libera Università di Bolzano, Facoltà di Scienze e Tecnologie, Bolzano (Italy)
(7)
Giovanni Sanesi 0000-0002-4218-3605
University of Bari Aldo Moro, Department of Agro-environmental and Territorial Sciences, Bari (Italy)

Corresponding author

 
Giuseppe Carrus
giuseppe.carrus@uniroma3.it

Citation

Carrus G, Panno A, Aragones JI, Marchetti M, Motta R, Tonon G, Sanesi G (2020). Public perceptions of forests across Italy: an exploratory national survey. iForest 13: 323-328. - doi: 10.3832/ifor3394-013

Academic Editor

Marco Borghetti

Paper history

Received: Mar 06, 2020
Accepted: Jun 08, 2020

First online: Jul 28, 2020
Publication Date: Aug 31, 2020
Publication Time: 1.67 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 2370
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 1868
Abstract Page Views: 176
PDF Downloads: 288
Citation/Reference Downloads: 3
XML Downloads: 35

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 85
Overall contacts: 2370
Avg. contacts per week: 195.18

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Jun 2020)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Abel T (1998)
Complex adaptive systems, evolutionism, and ecology within anthropology: interdisciplinary research for understanding cultural and ecological dynamics. Journal of Ecological Anthropology 2: 6-29.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Bain PG, Kroonenberg PM, Johansson LO, Milfont TL, Crimston CR, Kurz T, Bushina E, Calligaro C, Demarque C, Guan Y, Park J (2019)
Public views of the Sustainable Development Goals across countries. Nature Sustainability 2 (9): 819-825.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Carrus G, Cini F, Bonaiuto M, Mauro A (2009)
Local mass media communication and environmental disputes: an analysis of press communication on the designation of the Tuscan Archipelago National Park in Italy. Society and Natural Resources 22: 607-624.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Carrus G, Passiatore Y, Pirchio S, Scopelliti M (2015a)
Contact with nature in educational settings might help cognitive functioning and promote positive social behaviour. PsyEcology 6: 191-212.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, Agrimi M, Portoghesi L, Semenzato P, Sanesi G (2015b)
Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 134: 221-228.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Panno A, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Pirchio S, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, Agrimi M, Portoghesi L, Semenzato P, Sanesi G (2017)
A different way to stay in touch with “urban nature”: the perceived restorative qualities of botanical gardens. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Frantzeskaki N, Dumitru A, Anguelovski I, Avelino F, Bach M, Best B, Binder C, Barnes J, Carrus G, Egermann M, Haxeltine A, Moore M, Garcia Mira R, Loorbach D, Uzzell D, Omann I, Olsson P, Silvestri G, Stedman R, Wittmayer J, Durrant R, Rauschmayer F (2016)
Elucidating the changing roles of civil society in urban sustainability transitions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22: 41-50.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Graumann C, Kruse L (1990)
The environment: social construction and psychological problems. In: “Societal Psychology” (Himmtelweit HT, Gaskell G eds). Sage, London, UK, pp. 212-229.
Online | Gscholar
(9)
Hartig T, Van Den Berg AE, Hagerhall CM, Tomalak M, Bauer N, Hansmann R, Ojala A, Syngollitou E, Carrus G, Van Herzele H, Bell S, Camilleri Podesta MT, Waaseth G (2011)
Health benefits of nature experience: psychological, social and cultural processes. In “Forests, Trees and Human Health” (Nilsson K, Sangster M, Gallis C, Hartig T, De Vries S, Seeland K, Schipperijn J eds). Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 127-168.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Heberlein T (1989)
Attitudes and environmental management. Journal of Social Issues 1: 37-57.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
IUTI (2017)
Italian inventory of land use. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, Roma, Italy. [in Italian]
Online | Gscholar
(12)
Marchetti M, Motta R, Pettenella D, Sallustio L, Vacchiano G (2018)
Forests and the forest-wood system in Italy: towards a new strategy to respond to internal and global challenges. Forest@ 15: 41-50. [in Italian with English abstract]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Mastandrea S, Bartoli G, Carrus G (2011)
The automatic aesthetic evaluation of different art and architectural styles. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5: 126-134.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Mastandrea S, Maricchiolo F (2014)
Implicit and explicit aesthetic evaluation of design objects. Art and Perception 2: 141-162.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Mayer FS, Frantz CM (2004)
The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 503-515.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Mayer FS, Frantz CM, Bruehlman-Senecal E, Dolliver L (2009)
Why is nature beneficial. Environment and Behavior 41: 607-643.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Meijaard E, Abram NK, Wells JA, Pellier AS, Ancrenaz M, Gaveau DL, Runting RK, Mengersen K (2013)
People’s perceptions about the importance of forests on Borneo. PLoS One 8: e73008.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Mercado-Doménech SJ, Carrus G, Terán-Alvarez-Del-Rey A, Pirchio S (2017)
Valuation theory: an environmental, developmental and evolutionary psychological approach. Implications for the field of environmental education. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS) 16: 77-97.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Navarro O, Tapia-Fonllem C, Fraijo-Sing B, Roussi N, Ortiz-Valdez A, Guillard M, Wittenberg I, Fleury-Bahi G (2019)
Connectedness to nature and its relationship with spirituality, wellbeing and sustainable behaviour. Psyecology 11: 37-48.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Nilsson K, Sangster M, Gallis C, Hartig T, De Vries S, Seeland K, Schipperijn J (2011)
Forests, trees and human health. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 427.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Paletto A, De Meo I, Cantiani P, Guerrini S, Lagomarsino A (2018)
Social perception of forest management: the case of the peri-urban forest of Monte Morello (Florence, Italy). Forest@ 15: 29-39. [in Italian with English abstract]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Panno A, Carrus G, Lafortezza R, Mariani L, Sanesi G (2017)
Nature-based solutions to promote human resilience and wellbeing in cities during increasingly hot summers. Environmental Research 159: 249-256.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Pasca L, Aragonés JI, Fraijo-Sing B (2019)
Categorizing landscapes: Approaching the concept of Nature / Categorizando paisajes: una aproximación al concepto de naturaleza. PsyEcology 6: 1-21.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Pastorella F, Maesano M, Paletto A, Giacovelli G, Vivona S, Veltri A, Pellicone G, Matteucci G, Scarascia Mugnozza G (2017)
Ecosystem services in forests of Calabria: stakeholders’ perception. Forest@ 14: 143-161. [in Italian with English abstract]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Perlin J (1991)
A forest journey: the role of wood in the development of civilization. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA, pp. 446.
Gscholar
(26)
Pol E, Castrechini A, Carrus G (2017)
Quality of life and sustainability: the end of quality at any price. In “Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research” (Fleury-Bahi G, Pol E, Navarro O eds). Springer International, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 11-39.
Gscholar
(27)
Pol E, Di Masso A, Castrechini A, Bonet M, Vidal T (2006)
Psychological parameters to understand and manage the NIMBY effect. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology 56: 43-51.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Roovers P, Hermy M, Gulinck H (2002)
Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning 59: 129-145.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Sanesi G, Lafortezza R, Bonnes M, Carrus G (2006)
Comparison of two different approaches for assessing the psychological and social dimensions of green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 5: 121-129.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Schultz PW, Shriver C, Tabanico JJ, Khazian AM (2004)
Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 31-42.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Tam K (2013)
Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34: 68-78.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Van Den Berg AE, Hartig T, Staats H (2007)
Preference for nature in urbanized societies: stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues 63: 79-96.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info