*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

*

Effect of stand density on longitudinal variation of wood and bark growth in fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations

Fernanda Maria Guedes Ramalho (1), Emanuella Mesquita Pimenta (1), Caio Palmeira Goulart (1), Maria Naruna Félix De Almeida (2), Graziela Baptista Vidaurre (2), Paulo Ricardo Gherardi Hein (1)   

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 527-532 (2019)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3082-012
Published: Dec 12, 2019 - Copyright © 2019 SISEF

Research Articles


The influence of tree spacing on the wood/bark ratio is unknown in young fast-growing Eucalyptus trees. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of plant spacing on the wood and bark production along the Eucalyptus stem. Four genetic materials were planted in four spacings: 3×1 m, 3×2 m, 3×3 m and 3×4 m. Three 5-year-old trees from each clone and in each plant spacing were harvested. Cross-sectional discs (thickness: 30 mm) were cut from each tree along the stem (0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of the total tree height) and at 1.3 m above ground, totaling 288 disks (4 spacings × 4 clones × 3 replicates × 6 axial positions). The wood thickness was measured at six random and equidistant points around the perimeter using a gauge and means were calculated from each disc. Six cross diameters were measured for each debarked disc. After obtaining the averaged bark thickness and wood diameter, the bark content was calculated as the ratio between the surface area occupied by the bark and the total area of the stem in each level. In the narrowed plant spacing (3×1), the trees had a mean diameter of 7.4 cm, while at the spacing 3×4 the diameter of the trees was 91% higher (14.11 cm) at breast height. The increase in plant spacing from 3 to 12 m2 per tree resulted in an increase in bark thickness (56.7%) from 1.94 mm to 3.04 mm, but caused a reduction of bark content (16%) from 9.66% to 8.11%. Our findings show that trees grown under wider spacing tend to produce thicker bark. The bark thickness and the effect of plant spacing on the bark thickness decreased in the base-top direction. The correlation between bark thickness and wood diameter increases from 0.682 to 0.825 with the increase of spacing between trees. In contrast, the bark thickness to bark content correlation decrease from 0.735 to 0.15 with increased plant spacing. The stand density significantly affected the variation of the stem diameter, bark thickness and bark content of Eucalyptus plantations.

  Keywords


Stand Density, Timber, Bark, Silvicultural Treatment, Forest Productivity

Authors’ address

(1)
Fernanda Maria Guedes Ramalho
Emanuella Mesquita Pimenta
Caio Palmeira Goulart
Paulo Ricardo Gherardi Hein 0000-0002-9152-6803
Federal University of Lavras, Department of Forest Science, Lavras, CP37, 37200-000 (Brazil)
(2)
Maria Naruna Félix De Almeida
Graziela Baptista Vidaurre 0000-0001-9285-7105
Federal University of Espírito Santo, Department of Forest Science, Jerônimo Monteiro, 29550-000 (Brazil)

Corresponding author

 
Paulo Ricardo Gherardi Hein
paulo.hein@ufla.br

Citation

Ramalho FMG, Pimenta EM, Goulart CP, De Almeida MNF, Vidaurre GB, Hein PRG (2019). Effect of stand density on longitudinal variation of wood and bark growth in fast-growing Eucalyptus plantations. iForest 12: 527-532. - doi: 10.3832/ifor3082-012

Academic Editor

Roberto Tognetti

Paper history

Received: Feb 25, 2019
Accepted: Aug 31, 2019

First online: Dec 12, 2019
Publication Date: Dec 31, 2019
Publication Time: 3.43 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 5963
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 4946
Abstract Page Views: 417
PDF Downloads: 507
Citation/Reference Downloads: 6
XML Downloads: 87

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 317
Overall contacts: 5963
Avg. contacts per week: 131.68

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Jun 2020)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Burger LM, Richter HG (1991)
Anatomia da madeira [Wood anatomy]. Nobel, São Paulo, Brazil, pp. 154. [in Portuguese]
Gscholar
(2)
Gao P, Zhou Y, Meng F, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Zhang W, Xue G (2016)
Preparation and characterization of hydrochar from waste eucalyptus bark by hydrothermal carbonization. Energy 97: 238-245.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Gomat HY, Deleporte P, Moukini R, Mialounguila G, Ognouabi N, Saya AR, Vigneron P, Saint-Andre L (2011)
What factors influence the stem taper of Eucalyptus: growth, environmental conditions, or genetics? Annals of Forest Science 68: 109.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Gottesfeld LMJ (1992)
The importance of bark products in the aboriginal economies of Northwestern British Columbia, Canada. Economic Botany 46: 148.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
IBA (2017)
Anuário estatístico da Indústria Brasileira de Arvores: ano base 2016 [Statistical yearbook of the Brazilian tree industry: base year 2016]. IBA - Indústria Brasileira de Árvores, Brasília, Brazil, pp. 77. [in Portuguese]
Gscholar
(6)
Lima MA, Lavorente GB, Silva HKP, Bragatto J, Rezende CA, Bernardinelli OD, Azevedo ER, Gomez LD, McQueen-Mason SJ, Labate CA, Polikarpov I (2013)
Effects of pretreatment on morphology, chemical composition and enzymatic digestibility of Eucalyptus bark: a potentially valuable source of fermentable sugars for biofuel production - part 1. Biotechnology for Biofuels 6: 75.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Martins TGV, Rocha MFV, Nieri EM, Melo LA, Silva MLS, Silva DSN (2019)
Nutrient accumulation in Eucalyptus bark at different population densities. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 23 (1): 40-46.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Miranda I, Lima L, Quilhó T, Knapic S, Pereira H (2016)
The bark of Eucalyptus sideroxylon as a source of phenolic extracts with anti-oxidant properties. Industrial Crops and Products 82: 81-87.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Miranda I, Pereira H (2015)
Variation of wood and bark density and production in coppiced Eucalyptus globulus trees in a second rotation. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 9: 270-275.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Morais LC, Freitas OM, Gonçalves EP, Vasconcelos LT, González Beça CG (1999)
Reactive dyes removal from wastewaters by adsorption on Eucalyptus bark: variables that define the process. Water Research 33 (4): 979-988.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Neiva DM, Araújo S, Gominho J, Carneiro AC, Pereira H (2018)
Potential of Eucalyptus globulus industrial bark as a biorefinery feedstock: Chemical and fuel characterization. Industrial Crops and Products 123: 262-270.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Parreira P, Soares BIG, Freire CSR, Silvestre AJD, Reis CA, Martins MCL, Duarte MF (2017)
Eucalyptus spp. outer bark extracts inhibit Helicobacter pylori growth: in vitro studies. Industrial Crops and Products 105: 207-214.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Patnukao P, Pavasant P (2008)
Activated carbon from Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn bark using phosphoric acid activation. Bioresource Technology 99 (17): 8540-8543.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Niemistö P (1995)
Influence of initial spacing and row-to-row distance on the crown and branch properties and taper of silver birch (Betula pendula). Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 10 (1-4): 235-244.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Quilho T, Pereira H (2001)
Within and between-tree variation of bark content and wood density of Eucalyptus globulus in commercial plantations. Iawa Journal 22: 255-265.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Ramírez M, Rodríguez J, Balocchi C, Peredo M, Elissetche JP, Mendonça R, Valenzuela S (2009)
Chemical composition and wood anatomy of Eucalyptus globulus clones: variations and relationships with pulpability and handsheet properties. Journal of Wood Chemistry and Technology 29 (1): 43-58.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Reina L, Botto E, Mantero C, Moyna P, Menéndez P (2016)
Production of second generation ethanol using Eucalyptus dunnii bark residues and ionic liquid pretreatment. Biomass and Bioenergy 93: 116-121.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Resquin F, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, Carrasco-Letelier L, Casnati CR (2019)
Influence of contrasting stocking densities on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and wood density of Eucalyptus benthamii, Eucalyptus dunnii, and Eucalyptus grandis for bioenergy in Uruguay. Forest Ecology and Management 438: 63-74.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Rocha MFV, Pereira BC, Oliveira AC, Pego MFF, Veiga TRLA, Carneiro ACO (2018)
Influence of plant spacing on the bark properties of Eucalyptus clone. Revista Arvore 42 (5): e420501.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Rocha MFV, Vital BR, Carneiro ACO, Carvalho AMML, Cardoso MT, Hein PRG (2016)
Effect of plant spacing on the physical, chemical and energy properties of Eucalyptus wood and bark. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 28 (3): 243-248.
Gscholar
(21)
Romaní A, Yánez R, García A, Cancelas A, Angel S, Teixeira JA, Domingues L (2018)
Potential of Eucalyptus bark for biofuels production. In: Proceedings of the “4th Iberoamerican Congress on Biorefineries”. Jaén (Spain) 24-26 Oct 2018, vol. 48, pp. 63-68.
Online | Gscholar
(22)
Sarin V, Pant KK (2006)
Removal of chromium from industrial waste by using Eucalyptus bark. Bioresource Technology 97 (1): 15-20.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Scolforo HF, Castro Neto F, Scolforo JRS, Burkhart H, McTague JP, Raimundo MR, Loos RA, Fonseca S, Sartório RC (2016)
Modeling dominant height growth of Eucalyptus plantations with parameters conditioned to climatic variations. Forest Ecology and Management 380: 182-195.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Sette CRJ, Hansted ALS, Novaes E, Fonseca e Lima PA, Rodrigues AC, Santos DRS, Yamaji FM (2018)
Energy enhancement of the Eucalyptus bark by briquette production. Industrial Crops and Products 122: 209-213.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Silva CL, Roldão BC, Santos LDT, Hein PRG (2018)
Lenho e casca de Eucalyptus e Acacia em plantios monoespecíficos e consorciados [Wood and bark of Eucalyptus and Acacia in monospecific and consorciated plantings]. Floresta e Ambiente 25 (1): e00081914. [in Portuguese]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Vázquez G, Fontenla E, Santos J, Freire MS, González-Alvarez J, Antorrena G (2008)
Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of chestnut (Castanea sativa) shell and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) bark extracts. Industrial Crops and Products 28 (3): 279-285.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Weerakkody NS, Caffin N, Lambert LK, Turner MS, Dykes GA (2011)
Synergistic antimicrobial activity of galangal (Alpinia galanga), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and lemon iron bark (Eucalyptus staigerana) extracts. Journal Science of Food and Agriculture 91: 461-468.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Will RE, Narahari NV, Shiver BD, Teskey RO (2005)
Effects of planting density on canopy dynamics and stem growth for intensively managed loblolly pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management 205 (1-3): 29-41.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Zobel B, Jett JB (1995)
Genetics of wood production. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 336.
Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info