*

Energy and environmental profile comparison of TMT production from two different companies - a Spanish/Portuguese case study

José Ferreira (1)   , René Herrera (2), Jalel Labidi (2), Bruno Esteves (1), Idalina Domingos (1)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 155-161 (2018)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2339-010
Published: Feb 07, 2018 - Copyright © 2018 SISEF

Research Articles

Collection/Special Issue: COST action FP1407
Understanding wood modification through an integrated scientific and environmental impact approach
Guest Editors: Giacomo Goli, Andreja Kutnar, Dennis Jones, Dick Sandberg


Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a technique for assessing the environmental aspects and potential impacts associated with a product and has been increasingly used to identify processes or stages in the wood chain with a high environmental impact or to highlight areas where environmental information is unknown. The main aim of this study was to quantify and compare the environmental impacts and the energy used for the production of one cubic meter of Thermally Modified Timber (TMT) by two different companies, one in Spain and the other in Portugal, using the LCA methodology. The LCA study was developed based on ISO 14040/44 standards. The inventory analysis and, subsequently, the impact analysis were performed using the LCA software SimaPro8.1.0.60. The method chosen for the environmental impact assessment was ReCiPe, and for energy use the Cumulative Energy Demand method was chosen. The results show that to produce 1 m3 of thermally modified pine timber the Portuguese company used 14.38 GJ of cumulative energy demand, of which 1.92 GJ was nonrenewable and 12.46 GJ renewable, and the Spanish company used a total of 17.55 GJ, of which 2.52 GJ was nonrenewable and 15.03 GJ renewable. The thermally modified pine timber produced by the Spanish company presented the best environmental results for 13 impact categories in comparison to the 5 best environmental results presented by the Portuguese company. From the weighting triangle, we can conclude that the Portuguese pine boards have a lower environmental impact than Spanish pine boards if a high weight (> 40%) is given to resources, while a weight of <80% is given to human health; otherwise the opposite is true. Regardless of the company, the energy used in the thermal treatment process was identified as the main factor responsible for climate change, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant formation, metal depletion and fossil depletion. This has to be expected as the treatment is based on heat production and no chemicals are added during the heat treatment process. The round wood production was identified as the leading process responsible for ozone depletion and also presented remarkable contributions to eutrophication and photochemical oxidant formation.

  Keywords


Energy, Life Cycle Assessment, Thermally Treated Timber

Authors’ address

(1)
José Ferreira
Bruno Esteves
Idalina Domingos
Centre for the Study of Education, Technologies and Health, Campus Politécnico, 3504-510 Viseu (Portugal)
(2)
René Herrera
Jalel Labidi
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, University of the Basque Country, 20018 San Sebastian (Spain)

Corresponding author

 
José Ferreira
jvf@estv.ipv.pt

Citation

Ferreira J, Herrera R, Labidi J, Esteves B, Domingos I (2018). Energy and environmental profile comparison of TMT production from two different companies - a Spanish/Portuguese case study. iForest 11: 155-161. - doi: 10.3832/ifor2339-010

Academic Editor

Giacomo Goli

Paper history

Received: Dec 30, 2016
Accepted: Nov 21, 2017

First online: Feb 07, 2018
Publication Date: Feb 28, 2018
Publication Time: 2.60 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 6223
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 4573
Abstract Page Views: 220
PDF Downloads: 1174
Citation/Reference Downloads: 14
XML Downloads: 242

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 621
Overall contacts: 6223
Avg. contacts per week: 70.15

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Aug 2019)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
CNMC (2016)
National commission on markets and competition. Web site. [in Spanish]
Online | Gscholar
(2)
DNGF (2013)
Sixth national forest inventory. Preliminary results. Directorate of the National Forest Management, Lisboa, Portugal, Web site. [in Portuguese]
Online | Gscholar
(3)
EN-15804 (2013)
Sustainability of construction works - Environmental product declarations - Core rules for the product category of construction products. EN 15804:2012+A1:2013, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 66.
Gscholar
(4)
EN-335-1 (2006)
Durability of wood and wood- based products - Definition of use classes - Part 1: General. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 14.
Gscholar
(5)
EN-350-2 (1994)
Durability of wood and wood-based products. Natural durability of solid wood. Part 2: Guide to natural durability and treatability of selected wood species of importance in Europe. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 44.
Gscholar
(6)
ERSE (2016)
Regulatory entity for energy services. Web site. [in Portuguese]
Online | Gscholar
(7)
Esteves B, Pereira H (2009)
Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. Bioresources 4 (1): 370-404.
Gscholar
(8)
Ferreira J, Domingos I (2012)
Life cycle inventory of softwood production in the Portuguese forest. In: Proceedings and Abstracts of the IUFRO Conference, Division 5, Forest Products. Estoril Congress Centre (Lisbon, Portugal) 8-13 July 2012. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Vienna, Austria, pp. 157-158.
Gscholar
(9)
Ferreira J, Domingos I (2014)
Life cycle inventory of hardwood (Eucalyptus) production in the Portuguese forest. In: “Towards Forest Products and Processes with Lower Environmental Impact” (Caldeira F eds). E-Book, University Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal, pp. 55-62.
Gscholar
(10)
Ferreira J, Esteves B, Nunes L, Domingos I (2014a)
Life cycle assessment of thermally treated and untreated maritime pine boards: a Portuguese case study. In: Proceedings of “7th European Conference on Wood Modification”. LNEC (Lisbon, Portugal) 10-12 Mar 2014. LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 213.
Online | Gscholar
(11)
Ferreira J, Viana H, Esteves B, Lopes L, Domingos I (2014b)
Life cycle assessment of residual forestry biomass chips at a power plant: a Portuguese case study. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering 5 (2-3): 33.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
González-García S, Berg S, Feijoo G, Moreira MT (2009)
Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood: Spanish and Swedish case studies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14 (4): 340-353.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
González-García S, Dias A, Feijoo G, Moreira M, Arroja L (2014)
Divergences on the environmental impact associated to the production of maritime pine wood in Europe: French and Portuguese case studies. Science of the Total Environment 472: 324-337.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Hofstetter P, Braunschweig A, Mettier M, Müller-Wenk R, Tietje O (2000)
Dominance analysis in the mixing triangle, a graphical decision support tool for product comparisons. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3 (4): 97-115.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
ISO (2006a)
EN ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - principles and framework. International Standard Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 28.
Gscholar
(16)
ISO (2006b)
EN ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines. International Standard Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 46.
Gscholar
(17)
Jungmeier G, Werner F, Jarnehammar A, Hohenthal C, Richter K (2002)
Allocation in LCA of wood-based products, experiences of Cost Action E9. Part I - Methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7 (5): 290-294.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Klein D, Wolf C, Schulz C, Weber-Blaschke G (2015)
20 years of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the forestry sector: state of the art and a methodical proposal for the LCA of forest production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20: 556-575.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Marra M, Allegre O, Guercini S (2015)
LCA of ThermoVacuum treated softwood timber with comparison to untreated and preserved cladding. In: Proceedings of the 1st COST Action FP1307 International Conference “Life Cycle Assessment, EPDs, and modified wood” (Kutnar A, Burnard M, Schwarzkopf M, Simmons A eds). Koper (Slovenia) 25-26 Aug 2015. University of Primorska, Slovenia, pp. 20-22.
Gscholar
(20)
PCR-2012:01V2.01 (2016)
Product category rules according to ISO 14025. Construction products and construction services. The International EPD System. EPD International AB, Stockholm, Sweden, pp. 51.
Gscholar
(21)
PRé (2015)
SimaPro database manual. Methods library, version 2.8. PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands, pp. 63.
Online | Gscholar
(22)
Sandberg D, Kutnar A (2015)
Recent development of thermal wood treatments: relationship between modification processing, product properties, and the associated environmental impacts. In: Proceedings of the “IAWPS International Symposium on Wood Science and Technology”. Tokyo (Japan) 15-17 Mar 2015, pp. 55-59.
Online | Gscholar
(23)
ThermoWood (2003)
ThermoWood handbook. International ThermoWood Association, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 66.
Gscholar
(24)
ThermoWood (2008)
Executive summary- THERMOWOOD®: life cycle assessment (LCA) of Finnish thermally modified wood clading. Finnish ThermoWood Association, Publishing House Koivuniemi Ltd, Espoo, Finland, pp 12.
Online | Gscholar
(25)
Werner F, Althaus HJ, Künniger T, Richter K, Jungbluth N (2007)
Life cycle inventories of wood as fuel and construction material. Final Report Ecoinvent 2000 No. 9, EMPA Düdendorf, Swiss Centre of Life Cycle Inventories, Düdendors, Switzerland, pp. 176.
Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website