*

Acid atmospheric deposition in a forested mountain catchment

Josef Krecek (1), Ladislav Palán (1)   , Evžen Stuchlík (2)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 680-686 (2017)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2319-010
Published: Jul 17, 2017 - Copyright © 2017 SISEF

Research Articles


Acid atmospheric deposition is harmful to both forest and aquatic ecosystems. In mountain catchments, acidification also leads to difficulties in water resource management. In 2010-2012, acid atmospheric deposition was analysed in a small forest catchment located in the upper plain of the Jizera Mountains (Czech Republic). Patch observations included monitoring of the canopy interception in two mature stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) at elevations of 745 and 975 metres a.s.l., and twelve passive fog collectors situated along an elevation gradient between 862 and 994 metres a.s.l. In the studied area, fog (and low cloud) precipitation starts to affect the interception loss of the spruce canopy at elevations above 700 metres. However, fog drip was found to also rise with the canopy area. At the catchment scale, methods of spatial interpolation (ArcGIS 10.2) were used to approximate the aerial atmospheric deposition of water and acidic substances (sulphate, nitrate and ammonia). In the watersheds of two adjacent drinking water reservoirs, Josefuv Dul and Souš, the mean annual fog drip from the canopy was between 88 and 106 mm (i.e., 7-8% of the mean annual gross precipitation, or 10-12% of the mean annual runoff). Simultaneously, this load also deposited 658 kg km-2 of sulphur and 216 kg km-2 of nitrogen (i.e., 55% and 48% of the “open field” bulk amounts). Therefore, in headwater catchments stressed by acidification, the additional precipitation (measured under the canopy) can increase the water yield, but can also contribute to a decline in water quality, particularly in environments of low buffering capacity.

  Keywords


Mountain Watershed, Spruce Forests, Acid Atmospheric Deposition, Water Resources Recharge

Authors’ address

(1)
Josef Krecek
Ladislav Palán
Department of Hydraulics and Hydrology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, CZ-166 29 Prague 6 (Czech Republic)
(2)
Evžen Stuchlík
Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre CAS, Na Sádkách 7, CZ-37005 Ceské Budejovice (Czech Republic)

Corresponding author

 
Ladislav Palán
ladislav.palan@fsv.cvut.cz

Citation

Krecek J, Palán L, Stuchlík E (2017). Acid atmospheric deposition in a forested mountain catchment. iForest 10: 680-686. - doi: 10.3832/ifor2319-010

Academic Editor

Elena Paoletti

Paper history

Received: Dec 16, 2016
Accepted: May 08, 2017

First online: Jul 17, 2017
Publication Date: Aug 31, 2017
Publication Time: 2.33 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 8036
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 6096
Abstract Page Views: 295
PDF Downloads: 1352
Citation/Reference Downloads: 16
XML Downloads: 277

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 923
Overall contacts: 8036
Avg. contacts per week: 60.94

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Aug 2019)

Total number of cites (since 2017): 6
Average cites per year: 2.00

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Andersson F (2005)
Coniferous forests. Series “Ecosystems of the world” no. 6, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 646.
Online | Gscholar
(2)
Avila EE, Pereyra RG, Castellano NE, Saunders CPR (2001)
Ventilation coefficients for cylindrical collectors growing by riming as a function of the cloud droplet spectra. Atmospheric Research 57: 139-150.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Brechtel HM (1989)
Monitoring wet deposition in forest - quantitative and qualitative aspects. In: “Monitoring Air Pollution and Forest Ecosystem Research: Commission of the European Communities, Air Pollution Reports” (Bresser AHM, Mathy P eds). RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands, pp. 39-63.
Gscholar
(4)
Cape JN, Kirika A, Rowland AP, Wilson DR, Jickells TD, Cornell S (2001)
Organic nitrogen in precipitation: real problem or sampling artefact? The Scientific World Journal 1: 230-237.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Dawson TE (1998)
Fog in the California redwood forest: ecosystem inputs and use by plants. Oecologia 117: 476-485.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Delleur JW (1989)
Atmospheric deposition. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK, pp. 288.
Gscholar
(7)
Golterman H (1969)
Methods for chemical analysis of fresh waters. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, PA, USA,, pp. 172.
Online | Gscholar
(8)
Hildebrandt A, Eltahir EAB (2008)
Using a horizontal precipitation model to investigate the role of turbulent cloud deposition in survival of a seasonal cloud forest in Dhofar. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: 1-11.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Holder CD (2003)
Fog precipitation in the Sierra de las Minas Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Hydrological Processes 17: 2001-2010.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Holen S, Wright R, Seifert I (2013)
Effects of long range transported air pollution (LRTAP) on freshwater ecosystem services. ICP-Waters report 115/2013, NIVA - Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway, pp. 43.
Online | Gscholar
(11)
Igawa M, Matsumura K, Okochi H (2002)
High frequency and large deposition of acid fog on high elevation forest. Environmental Science 36: 1-6.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Ingwersen JB (1985)
Fog drip, water yield, and timber harvesting in the Bull Run municipal watershed, Oregon. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 21: 469-473.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Kim M-G, Lee B-K, Kim H-J (2006)
Cloud/fog water chemistry at a high elevation site in South Korea. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 55: 13-29.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Kopáček J, Procházková L (1993)
Semi-micro determination of ammonia in water by the rubazoic acid method. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 53: 243-248.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Kreček J, Horická Z (2006)
Forests, air pollution and water quality: influencing health in the headwaters of Central Europe’s “Black Triangle”. Unasylva 224: 46-49.
Gscholar
(16)
Kreček J, Horická Z (2010)
Recovery of Headwater Catchments and Lakes Affected by the Acid Atmospheric Deposition. In: “Integrated Watershed Management” (Beheim E, Rajwar GS, Haigh M, Krecek J eds). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 200.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Kreček J, Krčmár V (2015)
Landsat imagery applications to identify vegetation recovery from acidification in mountain catchments. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 64: 121-126.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Kreček J, Palán L (2015)
Effects of fog precipitation on water resources and drinking water treatment in the Jizera Mountains. Civil Engineering Journal 24: 1-7.
Online | Gscholar
(19)
Krečmer V, Fojt V, Kreček J (1979)
Fog precipitation and fog drip in forests as an item of water balance in a mountain region. Meteorological Bulletin (Meteorologické zprávy) 32: 78-81. [in Czech]
Gscholar
(20)
Krečmer V, Páv B (1982)
Methodology to estimate the number of rain gauges under the forest canopy. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics (Vodohospodársky časopis) 479-490. [in Czech]
Gscholar
(21)
Kroll G, Winkler P (1989)
Influence of meteorological parameters on interception of cloud droplets in a coniferous forest. Beitrage zur Physik der Atmosphere 62: 265-274.
Gscholar
(22)
Lovett GM, Reiners WA (1986)
Canopy structure and cloud water deposition in subalpine coniferous forests. Tellus B 38: 319-327.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Lovett GM (1988)
A comparison of methods for estimating cloud water deposition to a New Hampshire (USA) subalpine forest. In: “Acid Deposition at High Elevation Sites” (Unsworth MH, Fowler D eds). Springer, Netherlands, pp. 309-320.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Merilehto K, Kenttämies K, Kämäri J (1988)
Surface water acidification in the ECE region: regional acidification, current geographical extent of acidification in lakes, streams and reservoirs in the countries of the ECE region. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 156.
Online | Gscholar
(25)
Miller EC, Panek JA, Friedland AJ, Kadlecek J, Mohnen VA (1993)
Atmospheric deposition to a high-elevation forest at Whiteface Mountain, New York, USA. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 45: 209-227.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Mosello R, Barbieri A, Marchetto A (1995)
Seasonal variations and trends of atmosphere-borne nutriet load to the alpine biosphere and pedosphere. In: “The role of the hydrological cycle in Mountain Ecosystems”. University of Zurich, Zurich, Irchel, Switzerland, pp. 17-18.
Gscholar
(27)
Motulsky HJ, Searle P (1998)
InStat guide to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, California, USA, pp. 154.
Gscholar
(28)
Pahl S, Winkler P, Arends BG, Kos GPA, Schell D, Facchini MC, Fuzzi S, Gallagher MW, Colvile RN, Choularton TW, Berner A, Kruisz C, Bizjak M, Acker K, Wieprecht W (1997)
Vertical gradients of dissolved chemical constituents in evaporating clouds. Atmospheric Environment 31: 2577-2588.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Prošková J, Hunová I (2006)
Assessment methods of fog and low cloud deposition. Meteorological Bulletin (Meteorologické zprávy) 59: 151-157.
Gscholar
(30)
Ruiz G (2005)
Characterization of fog water collection potential at Fort Ord and Glen Deven Ranch near Big Sur. Faculty of Science and Environmental Policy, California State University, Monterey Bay, CA, USA, pp. 27.
Online | Gscholar
(31)
Schell D, Georgii H-W, Maser R, Jaeshke W, Arends BG, Winkler P, Schneider T (1992)
Intercomparison of fog water samplers. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology 44: 612-631.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Schemenauer R, Banic CM, Urquizo N (1995)
High elevation fog and precipitation chemistry in southern Quebec, Canada. Atmospheric Environment 29: 2235-2252.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(33)
Schöpp W, Posch M, Mylona S, Johansson M (2003)
Long-term development of acid deposition (1880-2030) in sensitive freshwater regions in Europe. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 7: 436-446.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Shaw EM, Beven KJ, Chappell NA (2010)
Hydrology in practice (4th edn). CRC Press, London, UK, pp. 560.
Online | Gscholar
(35)
Tolasz R, Baštyrová H (2007)
Climate atlas of Czechia. Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 256.
Gscholar
(36)
Verhoeven W, Herrmann R, Eiden R, Klemm O (1987)
A comparison of the chemical composition of fog and rainwater collected in the Fichtelgebirge, Federal Republic of Germany, and from the South Island of New Zealand. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 38: 210-221.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
Vogelmann HW (1973)
Fog precipitation in the cloud forests of Eastern Mexico. BioScience 23 (2): 96-100.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(38)
Walmsley JL, Schemenauer RS, Bridgman HA (1996)
A method for estimating the hydrologic input from fog in mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 35: 2237-2249.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(39)
Weathers KC, Lovett GM, Likens GE (1995)
Cloud deposition to a spruce forest edge. Atmospheric Environment 29: 665-672.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Whitman CD (2000)
Mountain meteorology: fundamentals and applications. University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 355.
Gscholar
(41)
WHO (2004)
Guidelines for drinking water quality (3rd edn). World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 515.
Gscholar
(42)
Wrzesinsky T, Klemm O (2000)
Summertime fog chemistry at a mountainous site in central Europe. Atmospheric Environment 34: 1487-1496.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website