*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

*

Oak sprouts grow better than seedlings under drought stress

Justyna Pietras (1-2)   , Marko Stojanović (1-2), Robert Knott (2), Radek Pokorný (1-2)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 529-535 (2016)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1823-009
Published: Mar 17, 2016 - Copyright © 2016 SISEF

Research Articles

Collection/Special Issue: IUFRO division 8.02 - Mendel University Brno (Czech Republic) 2015
Coppice forests: past, present and future
Guest Editors: Tomas Vrska, Renzo Motta, Alex Mosseler


This study focused on the comparison of two contrasting forest regeneration types and their susceptibility to drought stress. Transpiration and biomass production were studied on young sessile oak trees Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. regenerated as sprouts and seedlings, and grown in a coppice experimental site in the Czech Republic. Biomass production was estimated using destructive methods, while transpiration was derived from sap flow measurements and assessed according to the plant biometry and microclimatic conditions. Sprouts were characterized by a significantly higher diameter, height, leaf area and above-ground biomass and by a lower wood density as compared with seedlings of the same age. Moreover, the sap flow of sprouts was higher than that of seedlings, which was explained by the plant dimension. Transpiration, expressed as sap flow scaled to plant leaf area, did not differ between seedlings and sprouts when soil water was not limiting. However, during drought periods, when soil water potential dropped below -1.4 MPa, sprouts transpired significantly more than seedlings. Our results confirm that sprouts have access to a larger water pool via the old stump root system and are able to draw more water under drought. Moreover, sprouts seemed to be less susceptible to water limitations than seedlings of similar age. Less influence of drought on sprouts may partially explain their higher above-ground biomass production. Based on our results, coppice could be an appropriate management system to be adopted in sites characterized by frequent or extreme drought periods.

  Keywords


Drought Stress, Sap Flow, Transpiration, Biomass Production, Sessile Oak, Coppice, Sprout, Seedling

Authors’ address

(1)
Justyna Pietras
Marko Stojanović
Radek Pokorný
Department of Biomass Production and Water Balance, Global Change Research Center, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Belidla 4a, 603 00 Brno (Czech Republic)
(2)
Justyna Pietras
Marko Stojanović
Robert Knott
Radek Pokorný
Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelská 3, 613 00 Brno (Czech Republic)

Corresponding author

 
Justyna Pietras
pietras.j@czechglobe.cz

Citation

Pietras J, Stojanović M, Knott R, Pokorný R (2016). Oak sprouts grow better than seedlings under drought stress. iForest 9: 529-535. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1823-009

Academic Editor

Tamir Klein

Paper history

Received: Aug 26, 2015
Accepted: Jan 02, 2016

First online: Mar 17, 2016
Publication Date: Aug 09, 2016
Publication Time: 2.50 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 23563
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 17825
Abstract Page Views: 1049
PDF Downloads: 3425
Citation/Reference Downloads: 42
XML Downloads: 1222

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 2924
Overall contacts: 23563
Avg. contacts per week: 56.41

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Nov 2020)

Total number of cites (since 2016): 7
Average cites per year: 1.40

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim JH, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2010)
A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 660-684.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998)
Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper 56, UN-FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 333.
Online | Gscholar
(3)
Aranda I, Forner A, Cuesta B, Valladares F (2012)
Species-specific water use by forest tree species: From the tree to the stand. Agricultural Water Management 114: 67-77.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Arend M, Kuster T, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Dobbertin M (2011)
Provenance-specific growth responses to drought and air warming in three European oak species (Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens). Tree Physiology 31 (3): 287-297
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Aroca R (2012)
Plant responses to drought stress: from morphological to molecular features. Springer, Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, pp. 466.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Bequet R, Cermák J, Nadezhdina N, De Canniere C, Ceulemans R (2010)
Tree water dynamics non-destructively assessed through sap flow measurements and potential evapotranspiration. Biologia Plantarum 54 (2): 366-368.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2001)
Ecology of sprouting in woody plants: the persistence niche. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 (1): 45-51.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Bréda N, Cochard H, Dreyer E, Granier A (1993)
Field comparison of transpiration, stomatal conductance and vulnerability to cavitation of Quercus petraea and Quercus robur under water stress. Annals of Forest Science 50: 571-582.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Brugnoli E, Bjorkman O (1992)
Growth of cotton under continuous salinity stress: influence on allocation pattern, stomatal and non-stomatal components of photosynthesis and dissipation of excess light energy. Planta 187: 335-347.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Cermak J, Kucera J, Nadezhdina N (2004)
Sap flow measurements with some thermodynamic methods, flow integration within trees and scaling up from sample trees to entire forest stands. Trees 18: 529-546.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Cienciala E, Lindroth A (1994)
Gas exchange and sap flow measurements of willow trees in short-rotation forest. II. Diurnal and seasonal variations of stomatal response and water use efficiency. In: “Sap flow, transpiration and water use efficiency of spruce and willow in relation to climatic factors”. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Ecology and Environmental Research, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 13.
Gscholar
(12)
Dickmann DI, Nguyen PV, Pregitzer KS (1996)
Effects of irrigation and coppicing on above-ground growth, physiology and fine-root dynamics of two field-grown hybrid poplar clones. Forest Ecology and Management 8: 163-174.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Dickson RE, Tomlinson PT (1996)
Oak growth, development and carbon metabolism in response to water stress. Annals of Forest Science 53: 181-196.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Drake PL, Mendham DS, White DA, Ogden GN, Dell B (2012)
Water use and water-use efficiency of coppice and seedling Eucalyptus globulus Labill.: a comparison of stand-scale water balance components. Plant and Soil 350 (1-2): 221-235.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009)
Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 185-212.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Fujimori T (2001)
Ecological and silvicultural strategies for sustainable forest management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 412.
Online | Gscholar
(17)
Giurgiu V, Draghiciu D (2004)
Modele matematico-auxologice si tabele de productie pentru arborete [Mathematic-auxologic models and yield tables for forest stands]. Ceres Publishing House, Bucharest, Romania, pp. 607.
Gscholar
(18)
Hsiao TC (1973)
Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 24: 519-570.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
IPCC (2007)
Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp. 996.
Gscholar
(20)
Kadavy J, Kneifl R, Knott R (2011)
Biodiversity and target management of endangered and protected species in coppices and coppices-with-standards included in system of Natura 2000. Methodology of establishment of experimental research plots in the conversion to coppice and coppice-with-standards and their description. Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 57.
Gscholar
(21)
Larcher W (2003)
Physiological plant ecology (4th edn). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 517.
Online | Gscholar
(22)
Lindroth A, Cermak J, Kucera J, Cienciala E, Eckersten H (1995)
Sap flow by the heat-balance method applied to small-size Salix trees in a short-rotation forest. Biomass and Bioenergy 8: 7-15.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Lloret F, Penuelas J, Ogaya R (2004)
Establishment of co-existing Mediterranean tree species under a varying soil moisture regime. Journal of Vegetation Science 15 (2): 237-244.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Mason C, MacDonald SM (2002)
Responses of ground flora to coppice management in English woodland - A study using permanent quadrants. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 1773-1789.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Matthews JD (1991)
Silvicultural systems. Oxford University Press, Boston, MS, USA, pp. 296.
Online | Gscholar
(26)
McDowell NG (2011)
Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiology 155 (3): 1051-1059.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, Kimura K (2005)
Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 53 (2): 205-214.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Mugnai S, Ferrante A, Petrognani L, Serra G, Vernieri P (2009)
Stress-induced variation in leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence in Callistemon plants. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 4: 913-921.
Online | Gscholar
(29)
Nadezhdina N (1999)
Sap flow index as an indicator of plant water status. Tree Physiology 19: 885-891.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Nicolás E, Torrecillas A, Ortuño MF, Domingo R, Alarcón JJ (2005)
Evaluation of transpiration in adult apricot trees from sap flow measurements. Agricultural Water Management 72: 131-145.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Nielsen AB, Moller F (2008)
Is coppice a potential for urban forestry? The social perspective. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 7 (2): 129-138.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Plíva K (1987)
Typologický klasifikační systém ÚHÚL [Forest typology system of the Forest Management Institute of the Czech Republic]. Brandýs n.L., Czech Republic, pp. 55. [in Czech]
Online | Gscholar
(33)
Raftoyannis Y, Radoglou K (2002)
Physiological responses of beech and sessile oak in a natural mixed stand during a dry summer. Annals of Botany 89 (6): 723-730.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Roy PC, Morgan RJ (2011)
Slope stabilization and erosion control: a bioengineering approach. Taylor and Francis Ltd., London, UK, pp. 274.
Gscholar
(35)
Ryan MG (2011)
Tree responses to drought. Tree Physiology 31 (3): 237-239.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(36)
Savé R, Castell C, Terradas J (1999)
Gas exchange and water relations. In: “Ecology of Mediterranean evergreen oak forests” (Rodà F, Retana J Gracia CA, Bellot J eds). Series Ecological Studies, vol. 137, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 135-147.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
Singh B, Singh G (2004)
Influence of soil water regime on nutrient mobility and uptake by Dalbergia sissoo seedlings. Journal of Tropical Ecology 45 (2): 337-340.
Online | Gscholar
(38)
Thomas FM, Gausling T (2000)
Morphological and physiological responses of oak seedlings (Quercus petraea and Q. robur) to moderate drought. Annals of Forest Science 57: 325-333.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(39)
Trenberth KE (2011)
Changes in precipitation with climate change. Climate Research 47: 123-138.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Trouet V, Van Oldenborgh GJ (2013)
KNMI Climate Explorer: a web-based research tool for high-resolution paleoclimatology. Tree-Ring Research 69: 3-13.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(41)
Van Calster H, Baeten L, Verheyen K, De Keersmaeker L, Dekeyser S, Rogister JE, Hermy M (2008)
Diverging effect of overstorey conversion scenarios on the underground vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 519-528.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(42)
Vartiamäki H (2009)
The efficacy and potential risks of controlling sprouting in Finnish birches (Betula spp.) with the fungal decomposer Chondrostereum purpureum. Dissertationes Forestales 93, Finnish Society of Forest Science, Natural Resources Institute Finland, University of Helsinki, University of Eastern Finland, Finland, pp. 31.
Online | Gscholar
(43)
Wildy DT, Pate JS (2002)
Quantifying above- and below-ground growth responses of the western Australian oil mallee, Eucalyptus kochii subsp plenissima, to contrasting decapitation regimes. Annals of Botany 90: 185-197.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info