*

Linking biomass production in short rotation coppice with soil protection and nature conservation

Rainer Petzold (1)   , David Butler-Manning (2), Norbert Feldwisch (3), Thomas Glaser (4), Peter A Schmidt (5), Maik Denner (6), Karl-Heinz Feger (7)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 353-362 (2014)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1168-007
Published: May 19, 2014 - Copyright © 2014 SISEF

Research Articles

Collection/Special Issue: RegioResources21
Spatial information and participation of socio-ecological systems: experiences, tools and lessons learned for land-use planning
Guest Editors: Daniele La Rosa, Carsten Lorz, Hannes Jochen König, Christine Fürst


Biomass from short rotation coppice (SRC) plantations has attracted widespread attention as a component of new sustainable energy concepts. Nevertheless, as yet the surface area of SRC plantations in Europe is relatively low compared to other biomass producing land-use systems. This is somewhat incomprehensible because it has been shown that SRC systems also offer distinct ecological benefits. Therefore, greater consideration of the related ecosystem services should be incorporated into land-use planning processes. Presented in this study is a conceptual framework for the integration of soil protection and nature conservation into the spatial prioritization of areas suitable for SRC. This approach includes the development of a site-specific yield model and the identification and classification of criteria and indicators for both soil protection and nature conservation. The basic concept for planning procedures was established and tested for the State of Saxony (Germany). Existing constraints were identified, and could be attributed mainly to the availability of adequate information at different spatial scales. The regional-scale study emphasized the considerable biomass potential of SRC and the related synergy effects for soil protection and nature conservation. Future work should focus on the local (district, farm) and catchment scale and attempt to integrate additional aspects such as hydrological ecosystem services and carbon sequestration.

  Keywords


Short Rotation Coppice, Yield Estimation, Soil Protection, Nature Conservation, Land Use Planning

Authors’ address

(1)
Rainer Petzold
Public Enterprise Sachsenforst, Competence Center for Wood and Forestry, Bonnewitzer Str. 34, 01769 Pirna (Germany)
(2)
David Butler-Manning
TU Dresden, Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt (Germany)
(3)
Norbert Feldwisch
Consulting Engineers, Ingenieurbüro Feldwisch, Karl-Phillip-Str. 1, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach (Germany)
(4)
Thomas Glaser
Office for Nature Conservation and Sustainable Land Use, Rittergut 16, 01909 Großhartau (Germany)
(5)
Peter A Schmidt
TU Dresden, Institute of General Ecology and Environmental Protection, Pienner Str. 7, 01737 Tharandt (Germany)
(6)
Maik Denner
Saxon State Agency for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Postfach 540137, 01311 Dresden (Germany)
(7)
Karl-Heinz Feger
TU Dresden, Institute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Pienner Str. , 01737 Tharandt (Germany)

Corresponding author

 

Citation

Petzold R, Butler-Manning D, Feldwisch N, Glaser T, Schmidt PA, Denner M, Feger K-H (2014). Linking biomass production in short rotation coppice with soil protection and nature conservation. iForest 7: 353-362. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1168-007

Academic Editor

Marco Borghetti

Paper history

Received: Oct 31, 2013
Accepted: Nov 14, 2013

First online: May 19, 2014
Publication Date: Dec 01, 2014
Publication Time: 6.20 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 12520
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 8392
Abstract Page Views: 338
PDF Downloads: 3133
Citation/Reference Downloads: 34
XML Downloads: 623

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 2003
Overall contacts: 12520
Avg. contacts per week: 43.75

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Aug 2019)

Total number of cites (since 2014): 3
Average cites per year: 0.50

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Ad-hoc-AG Boden (2005)
Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung [Soil mapping] (5th edn). Schweitzerbartsche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 438. [in German]
Gscholar
(2)
AgroForNet (2011)
Nachhaltige Entwicklung ländlicher Regionen durch die Vernetzung von Produzenten und Verwertern von Dendromasse für die enrgetische Nutzung [Sustainable development of rural areas through the linking-up of producers and consumers of wood fuel]. Web site. [in German]
Online | Gscholar
(3)
Ali W (2009)
Modelling of biomass production potential of poplar in short rotation plantations on agricultural lands of Saxony. PhD thesis, Faculty of Forest, Geo and Hydro Sciences, TU Dresden, Germany, pp. 130.
Gscholar
(4)
Berndes G, Hansson J (2007)
Bioenergy expansion in the EU: cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels. Energy Policy 35: 5965-5979
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Böhm C, Quinkenstein A Freese D, Hüttl R (2009)
SRC at reclamation sites of Lower Lusatia - Growth development of four-year-old black locust. AFZ/DerWald 64: 532-533. [in German]
Gscholar
(6)
Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA (2007)
The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32 (1): 67-98.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Ciais P, Soussana JF, Vuichard N, Luyssaert S, Don A, Janssens IA, Piao SL, Dechow R, Lathière J, Maignan F, Wattenbach M, Smith P, Ammann C, Freibauer A, Schulze ED (2010)
The greenhouse gas balance of European grasslands. Biogeosciences Discussions 7 (4): 5997-6050.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR, Goulder L, Lubchenco J, Matson PA, Mooney HA, Postel S, Schneider SH, Tilman D, Woodwell GM (1997)
Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues in Ecology 2: 1-16.
Online | Gscholar
(9)
Deumlich D, Funk R, Frielinghaus M, Schmidt WA, Nitzsche O (2006)
Basics of effective erosion control in German agriculture. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 169: 370-381.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
deWit M, Faaij A (2010)
European biomass resource potential and costs. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 188-202
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Don A, Rebmann C, Kolle O, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schulze ED (2009)
Impact of afforestation-associated management changes on the carbon balance of grassland. Global Change Biology 15: 1990-2000
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Don A, Osborne B, Hastings A, Skiba U, Carter MS, Drewer J, Flessa H, Freibauer A, Hyvönen N, Jones MB, Lanigan GJ, Mander Ü, Monti A, Djomo SN, Valentine J, Walter K, Zegada-Lizarazu W, Zenone T (2012)
Land-use change to bioenergy production in Eusrope: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon. GCB Bioenergy 4: 372-391.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
EC (1979)
Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the Conservation of Wild Birds. European Council, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 18.
Online | Gscholar
(14)
EC (1992)
Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. European Council, Brussels, Belgium.
Online | Gscholar
(15)
EC (2003)
Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC). European Council, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 69.
Online | Gscholar
(16)
EC (2009)
Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Official Journal of the European Union L 140, 5 June 2009, pp. 16-47.
Online | Gscholar
(17)
Feldwisch N, Friedrich C, Schlumprecht H (2007)
Arbeitshilfe - Bodenschutzfachlicher Beitrag zur Entwicklung von Umsetzungsstrategien und Umsetzungsinstrumenten für eine umweltverträgliche Landnutzung in Natura2000-Gebieten [Working material - Contribution to soil protection for the development of strategies and instruments for the implementation of green land use in Natura 2000 Habitats]. Research Report LfuLG, Dresden, Germany, pp. 97. [in German]
Gscholar
(18)
Fohrer N, Möller D, Steiner N (2002)
An interdisciplinary modelling approach to evaluate the effects of land use change. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 27: 655-662
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Glaser T, Schmidt PA (2010)
Impacts of SRC on phytodiversity (in German). In: “AGROOWOOD Kurzumtriebsplantagen in Deutschland und europäische Perspektiven” (Bemmann A, Knust C eds). Weißensee Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 153-160
Gscholar
(20)
Haughton AJ, Bond AJ, et al. (2009)
A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: a case study of perennial biomass crops. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 315-322
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Hoffmann D, Weih M (2005)
Limitations and improvement of the potential utilisation of woody biomass for energy derived from short rotation woody crops in Sweden and Germany. Biomass and Bioenergy 28: 267-279
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Hellebrand H, Strähle M, Scholz V, Kern J (2010)
Soil carbon, soil nitrate, and soil emissions of nitrous oxide during cultivation of energy crops. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 87: 175-186
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Lamersdorf N, Petzold R, Schwärzel K, Feger KH, Köstner B, Moderow U, Bernhofer C, Knust C (2010)
Soil ecological aspects of SRC. In: “AGROWOOD - Kurzumtriebsplantagen in Deutschland und europäische Perspektiven” (Bemmann A, Knust C eds). Weißensee-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 170-188. [in German]
Gscholar
(24)
LfULG (2007)
Bodenatlas des Freistaates Sachsen. Teil 4: Auswertekarten zum Bodenschutz. [Soil Atlas of the Free State of Saxony. Part 4: scorecards for soil conservation]. Saxoprint Dresden, Germany. [DVD]
Gscholar
(25)
LfULG (2011)
Bodenschätzung [Soil evaluation]. Web site. [in German]
Online | Gscholar
(26)
Lockow KW (1995)
Die neue Ertragstafel für Roterle - Modellstruktur und Anwendung in der Forstpraxis [The new yield tables for red alder - model structure and application in forestry practice]. Beiträge für Forstwirtschaft und Landschaftsökologie 29: 49-55. [in German]
Gscholar
(27)
Makeschin F (1994)
Effects of energy forestry on soils. Biomass and Bioenergy 6: 63-79
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Malcewski J (2004)
GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in Planning 62: 3-65
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Mola-Yudego B (2011)
Trends and productivity improvements from commercial willow plantations in Sweden during the period 1986-2000. Biomass and Bioenergy 35: 446-453
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Peters K, Bilke G, Strohbach B (2007)
Yield performance of six-year-old black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) on four former arable sites of different soil quality in Brandenburg (in German). Archiv f. Forstwesen u. Landschafts.ökol 41: 26-28.
Gscholar
(31)
Petzold R, Schwärzel K, Feger KH (2011)
Transpiration of a hybrid poplar plantation in Saxony (Germany) in response to climate and soil conditions. European Journal of Forest Research 130 (5): 695-706.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Pretzsch J, Skodawessely C (2010)
Socio-economic and ethical aspects of short rotation coppice. In: “AGROWOOD - Kurzumtriebsplantagen in Deutschland und europäische Perspektiven” (Bemmann A, Knust C eds) . Weißensee-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 230-242. [in German]
Gscholar
(33)
Röhle H, Böcker L, Feger KH, Petzold R, Wolf H, Ali W (2008)
Establishment and expected yield of short-term rotation plantations in Eastern Germany. Schweiz Z Forstwes 159: 133-139.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Rowe RL, Hanley ME, Goulson D, Clarke DJ, Doncaster CP, Taylor G (2011)
Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment. Biomass and Bioenergy 35 (1): 325-336.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
SABAP (2007)
Use of biomass for energy generation - recommendations to policy makers. Expertise of the Scientific Advisory board on Agricultural Policy (SABAP), German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Web site.
Online | Gscholar
(36)
SABAP (2010)
EU agricultural policy after 2013 - Plea for a new policy for food, agriculture and rural areas. Expert opinion of the Scientific Advisory board on Agricultural Policy (SABAP), German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Web site.
Online | Gscholar
(37)
SächsNatSchG (2010)
Saxon Nature Conservation Act. SächsGVBl., pp. 270. [in German]
Online | Gscholar
(38)
SächsWG (2010)
Saxon Water Act. SächsGVBl., pp. 270. [in German]
Online | Gscholar
(39)
Schmidt-Walter P, Lamersdorf N (2012)
Biomass production with willow and poplar short rotation coppices on sensitive areas - The impact on nitrate leaching and groundwater recharge in a drinking water catchment near Hannover, Germany. Bioenergy Research 5 (3): 546-562.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Schwanecke W, Kopp D (1996)
Forstliche Wuchsgebiete und Wuchsbezirke im Freistaat Sachsen [Forest growth regions and districts in Saxony]. Schriftenreihe der Sächsischen Landesanstalt für Forsten 8, Graupa, Germany, pp. 191. [in German]
Online | Gscholar
(41)
Schwertmann U, Vogel W, Kainz M (1990)
Bodenerosion durch Wasser [Soil erosion by water]. Vorhersage des Abtrags und Bewertung von Gegenmaßnahmen. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 64.
Gscholar
(42)
Skodawessely C, Glaser T, Pretzsch J, Schmidt PA (2008)
Attitudes of farmers and nature conservation associations to short-rotation coppice (in German). Swiss Forestry Journal 159: 158-164
CrossRef | Gscholar
(43)
SMUL (2008)
Sachsen im Klimawandel - Eine Analyse [Climate change in Saxony - an analysis]. State Ministry of the Environment and Agriculture, Web site. [in German]
Online | Gscholar
(44)
TU Dresden (2011)
AgroForNet. Web site. [in German]
Online | Gscholar
(45)
Wischmeier W, Smith D (1978)
Predicting rainfall erosion loss: a guide to conservation planning. Agriculture Handbook 537, USDA, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 58.
Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website