*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

*

Field performance of poplar for bioenergy in southern Europe after two coppicing rotations: effects of clone and planting density

G Di Matteo (1)   , G Sperandio (2), S Verani (1)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 224-229 (2012)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0628-005
Published: Oct 02, 2012 - Copyright © 2012 SISEF

Research Articles


Short Rotation Forestry (SRF) plantations are estimated around 7 000 hectares in Italy, mostly established in northern regions. Recently thousands hectares of SRF were established in central and southern regions of Italy also (especially in Latium and Molise) due to the promising introduction of new clones resistant to summer water limiting and pest attacks. A poplar SRF plantation was established in central Italy in order to investigate the influence of site conditions and planting densities/spacings on the growth and yield production of three hybrid poplar clones (AF2, AF6 and Monviso). Cuttings of each clone were planted at two different densities/spacings and planting design as: (a) low density = 7 140 cuttings ha-1 in a single-row design (SR); (b) high density= 10 360 cuttings ha-1 in a twin-rows design (TR). Growth (both diameter and height) and yield were evaluated after biennial (2006-2007) and triennial (2008-2010) rotation. Relationships between fresh weight and diameter were determined to calculate the yield of each clone expressed in MgDM ha-1 years-1. At the end of the triennial rotation (2010) all poplar clones showed very high stump survival rates with higher values in SR (89.9%) compared to TR (85.6%). AF2 clone can be advisable thanks to the higher yield production than both AF6 and Monviso. Considering planting densities/spacings, SR seems to be more advisable than TR in order to obtain a good biomass production and a low planting costs. Considering the coppicing cycles, triennial rotation allows higher annual yield production (average value of 13.0 MgDM ha-1) than biennial rotation (average: 10.1 MgDM ha-1).

  Keywords


Short Rotation Forestry, Hybrid Populus Clones, Coppicing Cycles, Yield, Growth, Optimal Density

Authors’ address

(1)
G Di Matteo
S Verani
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura, Unità di ricerca per le Produzioni Legnose fuori Foresta (CRA-PLF), v. Valle della Quistione 27, I-00166 Rome (Italy)
(2)
G Sperandio
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura, Unità di ricerca per l’Ingegneria Agraria (CRA-ING), v. della Pascolare 16, I-00015 Monterotondo (RM - Italy)

Corresponding author

Citation

Di Matteo G, Sperandio G, Verani S (2012). Field performance of poplar for bioenergy in southern Europe after two coppicing rotations: effects of clone and planting density. iForest 5: 224-229. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0628-005

Academic Editor

Renzo Motta

Paper history

Received: Jan 24, 2012
Accepted: Aug 20, 2012

First online: Oct 02, 2012
Publication Date: Oct 30, 2012
Publication Time: 1.43 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 29780
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 22623
Abstract Page Views: 1413
PDF Downloads: 4303
Citation/Reference Downloads: 27
XML Downloads: 1414

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 4426
Overall contacts: 29780
Avg. contacts per week: 47.10

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Nov 2020)

Total number of cites (since 2012): 24
Average cites per year: 2.67

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Al Afas N, Marron N, Van Dongen S, Laureysens I, Ceulemans R (2008)
Dynamics of biomass production in a poplar coppice culture over three rotations (11 years). Forest Ecology and Management 255: 1883-1891.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Alcorn PJ, Pyttel P, Bauhus J, Smith RGB, Thomas D, James R, Nicotra A (2007)
Effects of initial planting density on branch development in 4-year-old plantation grown Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus cloeziana trees. Forest Ecology and Management 252: 41-51.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Armstrong A, Johns C, Tubby I (1999)
Effects of spacing and cutting cycle on the yield of poplar grown as an energy crop. Biomass and Bioenergy 17: 305-314.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Baratto G, Bergante S, Facciotto G, Annunziati M (2008)
Studies of poplars and willows short rotation coppice establishment. In: 23rd Session of International Poplar Commission “Poplar, Willow and People’s Wellbeing”. Beijing (China) 27-30 October 2008. Abstract of submitted papers, pp. 15.
Gscholar
(5)
Benetka V, Bartáková I, Mottl J (2002)
Productivity of Populus nigra L. ssp. nigra under short-rotation culture in marginal areas. Biomass and Bioenergy 23 (5): 327-336.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Bisoffi S, Minotta G, Paris P (2008)
Forest plantations and farm forestry in Italy: directions for cultivations and valorisations. In: Proceedings of the 3 “Silvicultural National Congress”. Taormina (ME - Italy) 16-19 October 2008, pp. 729-736. [in Italian]
Gscholar
(7)
Christersson L (2010)
Wood production potential in poplar plantations in Sweden. Biomass and Bioenergy 34 (9): 1289-1299.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Colorio G, Beni C, Facciotto G, Allegro G, Frison G (1996)
Influence of the cultural practices before planting on growth and phytosanitary status of poplar. Informatore Agrario 22: 51-57. [in Italian]
Gscholar
(9)
DeBell DS, Clendenen GW, Harrington CA, Zasada JC (1996)
Tree growth and stand development in short-rotation Populus plantings: 7-year results for two clones at three spacings. Biomass and Bioenergy 11 (4): 253-269.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Di Muzio Pasta V, Negri M, Facciotto G, Bergante S, Maggiore TM (2007)
Growth dynamics and biomass production of 12 poplar and 2 willow clones in a short rotation coppice in northern Italy. In: Proceedings of the “15th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition”. Berlin (Germany) 7-11 May 2007, pp. 749-755.
Gscholar
(11)
Facciotto G (1998)
Le lavorazioni del suolo in pioppicoltura. Sherwood 31: 39-44.
Gscholar
(12)
Facciotto G, Bergante S, Lioia C, Rosso L, Mughini G, Zenone T, Nervo G (2006)
Yields of poplar and willow in short rotation forestry. Forest@ 3 (2): 238-252.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Fara L, Filat M, Chira D, Fara S, Nutescu C (2009)
Preliminary research on short rotation cycle poplar clones for bioenergy production. In: Proceedings of the International Conference “RIO 9: World Climate and Energy Event” (Krauter S, Baranowsky F, Blandon NR, Kempf E eds). Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) 17-19 March 2009, pp. 127-132.
Gscholar
(14)
Filat M, Chira D, Nica MS, M. Dogaru (2010)
First year development of poplar clones in biomass short rotation coppiced experimental cultures. Annals of Forest Research 53 (2): 151-160.
Online | Gscholar
(15)
Giorcelli A, Allegro G, Verani S (2010)
Phytosanitary concerns in the biomass poplar plantation of the COFEA Project (Monterotondo - Rome). In: IPC WP6 Working party, Workshop meeting “Environmental applications of poplar and willow”. Montelibretti (RM - Italy) 17-18 September 2010 (p
Gscholar
(16)
Guidi W, Piccioni E, Ginanni M, Bonari E (2008)
Bark content estimation in poplar (Populus deltoites L.) short-rotation coppice in Central Italy. Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 518-524.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
IPCC (2007)
Summary for policy makers, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Online | Gscholar
(18)
Kauter D, Lewandowski I, Claupein W (2003)
Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use - a review of the physiological basis and management influences. Biomass and Bioenergy 24: 411-427.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Lanner RM (1985)
On the insensitivity of height growth to spacing. Forest Ecology and Management 13: 143-148.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Mareschi L, Paris P, Sabatti M, Nardin F, Giovanardi R, Manazzone S, Scarascia Mugnozza G (2005)
New varieties of poplar for biomass provide interesting productivity. Informatore Agrario 18: 49-53. [in Italian]
Gscholar
(21)
Mau F, Impens I (1989)
Comparative growth analysis of five first year establishment poplar clones (Populus sp) grown under short-rotation intensive culture system. Annales de Sciences Forestière 46: 250-255.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Minotta G, Muzzi E (2007)
Indagini su cedui di pioppo a turno breve nella pianura ferrarese. Italia Forestale e Montana 5: 411-419.
Gscholar
(23)
Mola-Yudegoa B, Aronssonb P (2008)
Yield models for commercial willow biomass plantations in Sweden. Biomass and Bioenergy 32: 829-837.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Muller A (2009)
Sustainable agriculture and the production of biomass for energy use. Climatic Change 94: 319-331.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Pannacci E, Bartolini S, Covarelli G (2009)
Evaluation of four poplar clones in a short rotation forestry in Central Italy. Italian Journal of Agronomy 4: 191-198.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Paris P, Mareschi L, Sabatti M, Pisanelli A, Ecosse A, Nardin F, Scarascia Mugnozza G (2011)
Comparing hybrid Populus clones for SRF across northern Italy after two biennial rotations: survival, growth and yield. Biomass and Bionergy 35: 1524-1532.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Picco F, Giorcelli A, Castro G (2007)
Dichotomous key for the nursery recognition of the main poplar clones grown in the European Union. Volume II Clonal cards. CRA-PLF, Research Units for Intensive Wood Production, Casale Monferrato, Italy, pp. 352.
Gscholar
(28)
Pontailler JY, Ceulemans R, Guittet J (1999)
Biomass yield of poplar after five 2-year coppice rotations. Forestry 72 (2): 157-163.
Gscholar
(29)
Reed DD, Jones EA, Tomé M, Araùjo MC (2003)
Models of potential height and diameter for Eucalyptus globulus in Portugal. Forest Ecology and Management 172: 191-198.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Rockwood DL, Naidu CV, Carter DR, Rahmani M, Spriggs TA, Lin C, Alker GR, Isebrands JG, Segrest SA (2004)
Short-rotation woody crops and phytoremediation: opportunities for agroforestry? Agroforestry Systems 61: 51-63.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Rédei K (1998)
Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) growing in Hungary. Forest Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 50.
Gscholar
(32)
Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Sabatti M, Paris P (2007)
La produzione di biomassa da colture arboree: realtà italiana e prospettive. In “Nuove frontiere dell’arboricoltura italiana” (Silverio S ed). Gruppo Perdisa, Bologna, Italy, pp. 517-533.
Gscholar
(33)
Schulze ED, Valentini R, Sanz MJ (2002)
The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: implication of the Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology. Global Change Biology 8: 505-518.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Smith CT (1995)
Environmental consequences of intensive harvesting. Biomass and Bioenergy 9: 161-179.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
Spinelli R, Nati C, Magagnotti N (2008)
Harvesting short rotation poplar plantation for biomass production. Croatian Journal of Forestry Engineering 29 (2): 129-139.
Gscholar
(36)
Trnka M, Trnka M, Fialova J, Koutecky V, Fajman M, Zalud Z, Hejduk S (2008)
Biomass production and survival rates of selected poplar clones grown under a short-rotation system on arable land. Plant and Soil Environment 52: 78-88.
Online | Gscholar
(37)
UNI 9091 (1987)
Wood - determination of moisture content - oven drying.
Online | Gscholar
(38)
UNI ISO 3130 (1985)
Wood - determination of moisture content for physical and mechanical tests.
Online | Gscholar
(39)
Verani S, Sperandio G (2008)
Pioppeto da biomassa a rotazione biennale. Caratteristiche e produttività dei cloni. Sherwood 148: 39-42.
Gscholar
(40)
Verani S, Sperandio G, Tarchi M (2009)
Piantagioni dedicate da biomassa. Analisi GIS nella regione Lazio. Sherwood 157: 41-45.
Gscholar
(41)
Weih M (2004)
Intensive short rotation forestry in boreal climates: present and future perspectives. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34 (7): 1369-1378.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(42)
Willebrand E, Ledin S, Verwijst T (1993)
Willow coppice systems in short rotation forestry: effects of plant spacing, rotation length and clonal composition on biomass production. Biomass and Bioenergy 4: 323-331.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info