*

Alterations on flow variability due to converting hardwood forests to pine

Y Serengil (1)   , WT Swank (2), JM Vose (2)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 44-49 (2012)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0609-009
Published: Apr 02, 2012 - Copyright © 2012 SISEF

Research Articles


Flow variability is a potential indicator of land use impacts on aquatic ecosystems and a dominating factor for lotic habitats. Vegetation management effects on the stream habitat conditions must be better understood to propose forest management activities that are compatible with general ecosystem management objectives (integrity, diversity, sustainability, etc.). In our study, we used long term flow data (1936-2004) from four gauged experimental watersheds (W1, W2, W17, W18) of Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory in US to assess the impacts of pine conversion on flow characteristics by using paired watershed experimentation. In W1, all trees and shrubs were cut and burned in 1956-57 and white pine (Pinus strobus) was planted in 1957. In W17, white pine was planted in 1956. W2 and W18 have been kept untreated as reference watersheds for W1 and W17, respectively. After analyzing long-term daily flow series with flow duration curves and frequency analyzes, we found that the timing and magnitude of 7Q flows were changed significantly due to conversion but flow variability was not affected. Overall findings revealed that pine conversion has significantly influenced some flow characteristics but stream habitat conditions were not affected potentially.

  Keywords


Flow variability, Conversion to pine, Ecological flows, High-low flow frequency

Authors’ address

(1)
Y Serengil
Dept. of Watershed Management, Istanbul University, Istanbul (Turkey)
(2)
WT Swank
JM Vose
Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 3160 Coweeta Lab Road, 2876 Otto, NC (USA)

Corresponding author

 

Citation

Serengil Y, Swank WT, Vose JM (2012). Alterations on flow variability due to converting hardwood forests to pine. iForest 5: 44-49. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0609-009

Academic Editor

Roberto Tognetti

Paper history

Received: Oct 24, 2011
Accepted: Feb 08, 2012

First online: Apr 02, 2012
Publication Date: Apr 30, 2012
Publication Time: 1.80 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 10426
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 7203
Abstract Page Views: 454
PDF Downloads: 2063
Citation/Reference Downloads: 25
XML Downloads: 681

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 2727
Overall contacts: 10426
Avg. contacts per week: 26.76

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Aug 2019)

Total number of cites (since 2012): 1
Average cites per year: 0.13

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Ammer S, Weber K, Abs C, Ammer C, Prietzel J (2006)
Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of earthworm communities in pure and converted Scots pine stands. Applied Soil Ecology 33: 10-21.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Archer D, Newson M (2002)
The use of indices of flow variability in assessing the hydrological and instream habitat impacts of upland afforestation and drainage. Journal of Hydrology 268: 244-258.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Azzellino A, Vismara R (2001)
Pool quality index: new method to define minimum flow requirements of high-gradient, low order streams. Journal of Environmental Engeneering 127: 1003-1013.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Brown LR, Gray RH, Hughes RM, Meador MR (2005)
Introduction to effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47: 1-8.
Online | Gscholar
(5)
Clausen B, Biggs BJF (1997)
Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams. Freshwater Biology 38: 327-342.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Erol A (2011)
Impact of land use on water yield in Darideresi watershed, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (20): 4699-4704.
Online | Gscholar
(7)
Gore JA, Layzer JB, Med J (2001)
Macroinvertebrate instream flow studies after 20 years: a role in stream and river restoration. Regulated Rivers 17: 527-542.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Hessburg PF, Agee JK (2003)
An environmental narrative of Inland northwest US forests, 1800-2000. Forest Ecology and Management 178: 23-59.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Huh S, Dickey, DA, Meador MR, Ruhl KE (2005)
Temporal analysis of the frequency and duration of low and high streamflow: years of record needed to characterize streamflow variability. Journal of Hydrology 310: 78-94.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Johnson R (1998)
The forest cycle and low flow river flows: a review of UK and international studies. Forest Ecology and Management 109: 1-7
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Kiely G (1999)
Climate change in Ireland from precipitation and streamflow observations. Advances in Water Resources 23 (2): 141-151.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
McDonald G, Lane M (2004)
Converging global indicators for sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 6 (1): 63-70.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Resh VH, Brown AV, Covich AP, Gurtz ME, Li HW, Minshall GW, Reice SR, Sheldon AL, Wallace JB, Wissmar RC (1988)
The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7 (4): 433.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996)
A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10 (4): 1163-1174.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Richter B, Baumgartner J, Wigington R, Braun D (1997)
How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37 (1): 231-249.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Serengil Y, Augustaitis A, Bytnerowicz A, Grulke N, Kozovitz AR, Matyssek R, Müller-Starck G, Schaub M, Wieser G, Coskun AA, Paoletti E (2011a)
Adaptation of forest ecosystems to air pollution and climate change: a global assessment on research priorities. iForest 4: 44-48.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Serengil Y, Swank WT, Riedel MS, Vose JM (2011b)
Conversion to pine: changes in timing and magnitude of high and low flows. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 26 (6): 568-575.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Smakhtin V (2001)
Low flow hydrology: a review. Journal of Hydrology 240 (3-4): 147-186.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Spiecker H (2003)
Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone. Journal of Environmental Management 67 (1): 55-65.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Stone MK, Wallace JB (1998)
Long-term recovery of a mountain stream from clear-cut logging: the effects of forest succession on benthic invertebrate community structure. Freshwater Biology 39 (1): 151-169.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Swank WT, Swift LW, Douglass JE (1988)
Streamflow changes associated with forest cutting, species conversions, and natural disturbances. In: “Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta” (Swank WT, Crossley Jr DA eds). Ecological Studies, vol. 66, Springer, New York, USA, pp. 297-312.
Gscholar
(22)
Swank WT, Crossley DA (1988)
Forest hydrology and ecology at Coweeta. Ecological Studies, vol 66, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
Gscholar
(23)
Swank W, Vose J, Elliott K (2001)
Long-term hydrologic and water quality responses following commercial clearcutting of mixed hardwoods on a southern Appalachian catchment. Forest Ecology and Management 143 (1-3): 163-178.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Wallace JB, Grubaugh JW, Whiles MW (1996)
Biotic indices and stream ecosystem processes: Results from an experimental. Ecological Applications 6 (1): 140-151.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Wood PJ, Agnew MD, Petts GE (2000)
Flow variations and macroinvertebrate community responses in a small groundwater-dominated stream in south-east England. Hydrological Process 14: 3133-3147.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Wood P, Armitage P (2004)
The response of the macroinvertebrate community to low-flow variability and supra-seasonal drought within a groundwater dominated stream. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 161 (1): 1-20.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Woodcock RW, McGrew KS, Mather N, Schrank FA (2003)
Woodcock-Johnson III diagnostic supplement to the tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, Riverside, IL, USA.
Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website