*

What happened to forests in Copenhagen?

Giacomo Grassi   , Sandro Federici, Roberto Pilli

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 30-32 (2010)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0529-003
Published: Mar 02, 2010 - Copyright © 2010 SISEF

Commentaries & Perspectives


After the chaotic final days of the Copenhagen climate conference, many saw only fog, i.e., an unclear outcome and much uncertainty on future steps to take. Were the forests lost in this fog or some tree is still visible, possibly suggesting a path to take? This commentary will briefly analyse the outcome of the Copenhagen conference with respect to the main forestry issues under debate: LULUCF (Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry, i.e., mainly forest CO2 removals in industrialized countries) and REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation in developing countries).

  Keywords


Forest, Climate Change, LULUCF, REDD, Kyoto

Authors’ address

(1)
Giacomo Grassi
Sandro Federici
Roberto Pilli
European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, VA (Italy)

Corresponding author

 
Giacomo Grassi
giacomo.grassi@jrc.it

Citation

Grassi G, Federici S, Pilli R (2010). What happened to forests in Copenhagen?. iForest 3: 30-32. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0529-003

Paper history

Received: Feb 12, 2010
Accepted: Feb 15, 2010

First online: Mar 02, 2010
Publication Date: Mar 02, 2010
Publication Time: 0.50 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 17380
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 14017
Abstract Page Views: 699
PDF Downloads: 2387
Citation/Reference Downloads: 27
XML Downloads: 250

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 3575
Overall contacts: 17380
Avg. contacts per week: 34.03

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Aug 2019)

Total number of cites (since 2010): 4
Average cites per year: 0.40

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Diamond J (2005)
Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking press, New York, USA, pp. 592.
Online | Gscholar
(2)
Le Quéré C, Raupach MR, Canadell JG, Marland G, Bopp L, Ciais P, Conway TJ, Doney SC, Feely RA, Foster P, Friedlingstein P, Gurney K, Houghton RA, House JI, Huntingford C, Levy PE, Lomas MR, Majkut J, Metzl N, Ometto JP, Peters GP, Prentice IC, Randerson JT, Running SW, Sarmiento JL, Schuster U, Sitch S, Takahashi T, Viovy N, van der Werf GR, Woodward FI (2009)
Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience 2: 831-836.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
van der Werf GR, Morton DC, DeFries RS, Olivier JGJ, Kasibhatla PS, Jackson RB, Collatz GJ, Randerson JT (2009)
CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geoscience 2: 737-738.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website