What happened to forests in Copenhagen?
Giacomo Grassi , Sandro Federici, Roberto Pilli
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 30-32 (2010)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0529-003
Published: Mar 02, 2010 - Copyright © 2010 SISEF
Commentaries & Perspectives
Abstract
After the chaotic final days of the Copenhagen climate conference, many saw only fog, i.e., an unclear outcome and much uncertainty on future steps to take. Were the forests lost in this fog or some tree is still visible, possibly suggesting a path to take? This commentary will briefly analyse the outcome of the Copenhagen conference with respect to the main forestry issues under debate: LULUCF (Land Use Land Use Change and Forestry, i.e., mainly forest CO2 removals in industrialized countries) and REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation in developing countries).
Keywords
Authors’ Info
Authors’ address
Sandro Federici
Roberto Pilli
European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, VA (Italy)
Corresponding author
Paper Info
Citation
Grassi G, Federici S, Pilli R (2010). What happened to forests in Copenhagen?. iForest 3: 30-32. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0529-003
Paper history
Received: Feb 12, 2010
Accepted: Feb 15, 2010
First online: Mar 02, 2010
Publication Date: Mar 02, 2010
Publication Time: 0.50 months
Copyright Information
© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2010
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Web Metrics
Breakdown by View Type
Article Usage
Total Article Views: 31145
(from publication date up to now)
Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 24739
Abstract Page Views: 1442
PDF Downloads: 4303
Citation/Reference Downloads: 27
XML Downloads: 634
Web Metrics
Days since publication: 5397
Overall contacts: 31145
Avg. contacts per week: 40.40
Citation Metrics
Article Citations
Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Nov 2020)
Total number of cites (since 2010): 4
Average cites per year: 0.36
Publication Metrics
by Dimensions ©
Articles citing this article
List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.
References
Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience 2: 831-836.
CrossRef | Gscholar